Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T13:21:23.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nurse Perspectives on the Practical, Emotional, and Professional Impacts of Living and Working in Post-earthquake Canterbury, New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 December 2015

Sarbjit S. Johal*
Affiliation:
Joint Centre for Disaster Research, Massey University, GNS Science, Wellington, New Zealand
Zoe Mounsey
Affiliation:
Joint Centre for Disaster Research, Massey University, GNS Science, Wellington, New Zealand
Petula Brannelly
Affiliation:
The International Care Ethics Observatory, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
David M. Johnston
Affiliation:
Joint Centre for Disaster Research, Massey University, GNS Science, Wellington, New Zealand
*
Correspondence: Sarbjit S. Johal, PhD Joint Centre for Disaster Research Massey University/GNS Science PO Box 756 Wellington 6140 New Zealand E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction

This report explores nurses’ perspectives following the Canterbury (New Zealand) 2010-2011 earthquake sequence and the subsequent recovery process.

Problem

Little is known about the experiences of health care professionals during a disaster recovery process, and this research generates insights about the challenges faced.

Methods

Qualitative semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 11 nurses from the Christchurch (New Zealand) area to explore the challenges faced by the nurses during and following the earthquakes. The interviews took place three years after the start of the earthquake experience to enable exploration of longer term aspects of the recovery process. The interview transcripts were analyzed and coded using a grounded theory approach.

Results

The data analysis identified that the nurses had faced a number of challenges and these were characterized as practical, emotional, and professional. While some of the challenges were short-lived in the aftermath of the earthquakes, some were long-lasting due to the extended nature of the recovery process. Dealing with house damage, insurance negotiations, and working in damaged environments had a negative impact on the nurses. The nurses experienced a range of emotions, both negative and positive, after the disaster, though many had needed time to elapse before feeling able to reflect on their experiences.

Discussion

The findings suggest that secondary stressors have a negative impact on the psychosocial recovery process. The nurses recognized that they received support from others and were also required to focus on others. Keeping busy appeared to be the most common coping strategy. This lack of reflection on their experiences may have resulted in delayed emotional responses. Some of the nurses changed their work role, hours, and responsibilities suggesting that working in this environment was having a detrimental impact.

Conclusion

The research indicates the challenges faced by nurses in the initial impact of the earthquakes and during the longer term recovery process. There is a need to consider the psychosocial impact of working and living in a post-disaster context and to develop support packages to ensure the health and well-being of nurses in this environment.

JohalSS , MounseyZ , BrannellyP , JohnstonDM . Nurse Perspectives on the Practical, Emotional, and Professional Impacts of Living and Working in Post-earthquake Canterbury, New Zealand. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(1):10–16.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Benedek, DM, Fullerton, C, Ursano, RJ. First responders: mental health consequences of natural and human-made disasters for public health and public safety workers. Annu Rev Publ Health. 2007;28:55-68.Google Scholar
2. Boscarino, JA, Figley, CR, Adams, RE. Compassion fatigue following the September 11 terrorist attacks: a study of secondary trauma among New York City social workers. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health. 2004;6(2):57-66.Google Scholar
3. Byrne, MK, Lerias, D, Sullivan, NL. Predicting vicarious traumatization in those indirectly exposed to bushfires. Stress Health. 2006;22:167-177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Ehring, T, Razik, S, Emmelkamp, PM. Prevalence and predictors of post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, depression, and burnout in Pakistani earthquake recovery workers. Psychiat Res. 2011;185(1):161-166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Wang, XL, Chan, CLW, Shi, ZB, Wang, B. Mental health risks in the local workforce engaged in disaster relief and reconstruction. Qual Health Res. 2013;23(2):207-217.Google Scholar
6. Robertson, AG, Dwyer, DE, Leclercq, MG. Operation South East Asia tsunami assist: an Australian team in the Maldives. Med J Aust. 2005;182(7):340-342.Google Scholar
7. Palmer, DJ, Stephens, D, Fisher, DA, Spain, B, Read, DJ, Notaras, L. The Bali bombing: the Royal Darwin Hospital response. Medical J Aust. 2003;179(7):358-361.Google Scholar
8. Kako, M, Ranse, J, Yamamoto, A, Arbon, P. What was the role of nurses during the 2011 Great East Earthquake of Japan? An integrative review of the Japanese literature. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(3):275-279.Google Scholar
9. Garner, AA, Harrison, K. Early post‐tsunami disaster medical assistance to Banda Aceh: a personal account. Emerg Med Australasia. 2006;18(1):93-96.Google Scholar
10. Kreiss, Y, Merin, O, Peleg, K, et al. Early disaster response in Haiti: the Israeli field hospital experience. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(1):45-48.Google Scholar
11. Cameron, PA, Mitra, B, Fitzgerald, M, et al. Black Saturday: the immediate impact of the February 2009 bushfires in Victoria, Australia. Med J Aust. 2009;191(1):11-16.Google Scholar
12. Ardagh, MW, Richardson, SK, Robinson, V, et al. The initial health-system response to the earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand, in February, 2011. Lancet. 2012;379(9831):2109-2115.Google Scholar
13. Gebbie, KM, Qureshi, K. Emergency and disaster preparedness: core competencies for nurses: what every nurse should but may not know. Am J Nurs. 2002;102(1):46-51.Google Scholar
14. World Health Organization and International Council for Nurses. ICN framework of disaster nursing competencies. Geneva (Switzerland); 2009. WHO Web site. http://www.wpro.who.int/hrh/documents/icn_framework.pdf?ua=1. Accessed June 29, 2015.Google Scholar
15. Ranse, J, Lenson, S. Beyond a clinical role: nurses were psychosocial supporters, coordinators, and problem solvers in the Black Saturday and Victorian bushfires in 2009. Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal. 2012;15(3):156-163.Google Scholar
16. Yang, YN, Xiao, LD, Cheng, HY, Zhu, JC, Arbon, P. Chinese nurses’ experience in the Wenchuan earthquake relief. Int Nurs Rev. 2010;57(2):217-223.Google Scholar
17. Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission. Final Report; 2012. http://canterbury.royalcommission.govt.nz/Final-Report---Volumes-1-2-and-3. Accessed June 29, 2015.Google Scholar
18. Christchurch Quake Map 2014. http://www.christchurchquakemap.co.nz/all. Accessed July 9, 2014.Google Scholar
19. Potter, SH, Becker, JS, Johnston, DM, Rossiter, KP. An overview of the impacts of the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquakes. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2015; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.014. Accessed June 29, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Crowe, M. “Quake brain:” coping with the series of earthquakes in Christchurch. Int J Ment Health. 2011;20:381-382.Google Scholar
21. Spittlehouse, JK, Joyce, PR, Vierck, E, Schluter, PJ, Pearson, JF. Ongoing adverse mental health impact of the earthquake sequence in Christchurch, New Zealand. Aust NZ J Psychiat. 2014;48(8):756-763.Google Scholar
22. Lock, S, Rubin, GJ, Murray, V, Rogers, MB, Amlôt, R, Williams, R. Secondary stressors and extreme events and disasters: a systematic review of primary research from 2010-2011. PLoS Currents. 2012;4.Google Scholar
23. Richardson, S, Ardagh, M, Grainger, P, Robinson, V. A moment in time: emergency nurses and the Canterbury earthquakes. Int Nurs Rev. 2013;60(2):188-195.Google Scholar
24. Johal, S, Mounsey, Z, Tuohy, R, Johnston, D. Coping with disaster: general practitioners’ perspectives on the impact of the Canterbury Earthquakes. PLoS Currents Disasters. 2014;6.Google Scholar
25. Johal, S, Mounsey, Z, Tuohy, R, Johnston, D. Patient reactions after the Canterbury Earthquakes 2010-11: a primary care perspective. PLOS Currents Disasters. 2014;1.Google Scholar
26. Wilding, N. Exploring community resilience in times of rapid change. 2011: Carnegie UK Trust, Dunfermline. http://www.carnegieuktrust.org.uk/getattachment/75a9e0c4-8d75-4acb-afac-6b1cbd6f2c1e/Exploring-Community-Resilience.aspx. Accessed June 29, 2015.Google Scholar
27. Miles, MB, Huberman, A. Qualitative Data Analysis: an Expanded Source Book. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, California USA: Sage Publications; 1994.Google Scholar
28. Nursing Council of New Zealand. The New Zealand Nursing Workforce: A Profile of Nurse Practitioners, Registered Nurses, and Enrolled Nurses 2012-2013. 2014. http://www.nursingcouncil.org.nz/Publications/Reports. Accessed June 29, 2015.Google Scholar
29. Glaser, BG, Strauss, AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Piscataway, New Jersey USA: Transaction Publishers; 2009.Google Scholar
30. Bryant, A, Charmaz, K. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, California USA: Sage Publications; 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Richards, HM, Schwartz, LJ. Ethics of qualitative research: are there special issues for health services research? Family Practice. 2002;19(2):135-139.Google Scholar
32. Wills, TA. Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychol Bull. 1981;90(2):245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Yan, L, Turale, S, Stone, TE, Petrini, M. A grounded theory study of “turning into a strong nurse:” earthquake experiences and perspectives on disaster nursing education. Nurs Educ Today. 2015;35(9):e43-e49.Google Scholar
34. Sabo, B. Reflecting on the concept of compassion fatigue. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. 2011;16(1):1.Google Scholar
35. Denscombe, M. The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research. 3rd Edition. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
36. Gomm, R. Social Research Methodology: A Critical Introduction. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.Google Scholar