Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T07:19:11.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Model Describing the Effect of Employment of the United States Military in a Complex Emergency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Donald S. MacMillan
Donald S. MacMillan*
Affiliation:
Yale Section of Emergency Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
*
Yale Section of Emergency Medicine, 464 Congress Avenue, Suite 260New Haven, CT 06519-1315USA E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The end of the Cold War vastly altered the worldwide political landscape. With the loss of a main competitor, the United States (US) military has had to adapt its strategic, operational, and tactical doctrines to an ever-increasing variety of non-traditional missions, including humanitarian operations. Complex emergencies (CEs) are defined in this paper from a political and military perspective, various factors that contribute to their development are described, and issues resulting from the employment of US military forces are discussed. A model was developed to illustrate the course of a humanitarian emergency and the potential impact of a military response. The US intervention in Haiti, Northern Iraq, Kosovo, Somalia, Bosnia, and Rwanda serve as examples.

A CE develops when there is civil conflict, loss of national governmental authority, a mass population movement, and massive economic failure, each leading to a general decline in food security. The military can alleviate a CE in four ways: (1) provide security for relief efforts; (2) enforce negotiated settlements; (3) provide security for non-combatants; and/or (4) employ logistical capabilities.

The model incorporates Norton and Miskel's taxonomy of identifying failing states and helps illustrate the factors that lead to a CE. The model can be used to determine if and when military intervention will have the greatest impact. The model demonstrates that early military intervention and mission assignment within the core competencies of the forces can reverse the course of a CE. Further study will be needed to verify the model.

Keywords

complex emergency (CE)disaster planninginternational cooperationmilitaryrefugeesrelief workUnited States (US)
Type
Theoretical Discussion
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 20 , Issue 5 , October 2005 , pp. 282 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Natsios, AS: Commanders guidance: A challenge of complex humanitarian emergencies. Parameters 1996;Summer:57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.DiPrizio, RC: Armed Humanitarians: U.S. Interventions from Northern Iraq to Kosovo. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 2002, p 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Natsios, AS: Commanders guidance: A challenge of complex humanitarian emergencies. Parameters 1996;Summer:58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Natsios AS: The Great North Korean Famine. Washington, D.C., United States Institute of Peace Press, 2001, p 76.Google Scholar
5.DiPrizio, RC: Armed Humanitarians: U.S. Interventions from Northern Iraq to Kosovo. Baltimore, The John Hopkins University Press, 2002, p 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Ibid, DiPrizio, 65.Google Scholar
7.Ibid, DiPrizio, 105.Google Scholar
8.Natsios AS: U.S. Foreign Policy and the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse; Humanitarian Relief in Complex Emergencies. Westport: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 1997, p 9.Google Scholar
9.McNeece, CA, Falconer, MK, Springer, D: Impact of immigration on health and human services: Florida's experience. Social Work in Health Care 2002;35:501–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Ibid, Natsios, Commanders, 56.Google Scholar
11.Norton, RJ, Miskel, JF: Spotting trouble identifying faltering and failing states. Naval War College Review 1996;Spring:79.Google Scholar
12. Ibid, Norton, 83.Google Scholar
13.Lucas, GR: Perspectives on Humanitarian Military Intervention. Berkeley, Berkeley Public Policy Press, 2001, p 17.Google Scholar
14.Ibid, Natsios, Commanders, 63.Google Scholar
15.Ibid, 59.Google Scholar