Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T10:47:53.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Injury Perceptions of Bombing Survivors—Interviews from the Oklahoma City Bombing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Mary T. Glenshaw ,
Jon S. Vernick ,
Shannon Frattaroli ,
Sheryll Brown  and
Sue Mallonee
Mary T. Glenshaw*
Affiliation:
Center for Injury Research and Policy, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Jon S. Vernick
Affiliation:
Center for Injury Research and Policy, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Shannon Frattaroli
Affiliation:
Center for Injury Research and Policy, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Sheryll Brown
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State Department of Health, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
Sue Mallonee
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State Department of Health, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
*
Epidemic Intelligence ServiceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention1600 Clifton Road NE, MS E92Atlanta, Georgia 30333USA E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Bombings, including the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, remain an important public health threat. However, there has been little investigation into the impressions of injury risk or protective factors of bombing survivors.

Objective:

This study analyzes Oklahoma City bombing survivors' impressions of factors that influenced their risk of injury, and validates a hazard timeline outlining phases of injury risk in a building bombing.

Methods:

In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted within a sample of Oklahoma City bombing survivors. Participants included 15 injured and uninjured survivors, who were located in three buildings surrounding the detonation site during the attack.

Results:

Risk factor themes included environmental glass, debris, and entrapment. Protective factors included knowledge of egress routes, shielding behaviors to deflect debris, and survival training. Building design and health status were reported as risk and protective factors. The hazard timeline was a useful tool, but should be modified to include a lay rescue phase. The combination of a narrative approach and direct questioning is an effective method of gathering the perceptions of survivors.

Conclusions:

Investigating survivors' impressions of building bombing hazards is critical to capture injury exposures, behavior patterns, and decision-making processes during actual events, and to identify interventions that will be supported by survivors.

Keywords

bombinjuryinterviewOklahoma City bombingqualitative researchrisk factorterrorism
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 23 , Issue 6 , December 2008 , pp. 500 - 506
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism:Terrorism Knowledge Base. Available at http://www.tkb.org/AnalyticalTools.jsp. Accessed 09 January 2008.Google Scholar
2.Mallonee, S, Shariat, S, Stennies, G, Waxweiler, R, Hogan, D, Jordan, F: Physical injuries and fatalities resulting from the Oklahoma City bombing. JAMA 1996;276:382–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.City of Oklahoma City: Final Report: Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building Bombing. Stillwater, OK: Fire Protection Publications, 1996.Google Scholar
4.Thompson, D, Brown, S, Mallonee, S, Sunshine, D: Fatal and non-fatal injuries among U.S. Air Force personnel resulting from the terrorist bombing of the Khobar Towers. J Trauma 2004;57:208–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Cooper, GJ, Maynard, RL, Cross, NL, Hill, JF: Casualties from terrorist bombings. J Trauma 1983;23:955–967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Helling, ER: Otologic blast injuries due to the Kenya embassy bombing. Mil Med 2004;169:872–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Wightman, JM, Gladish, SL: Explosions and blast injuries. Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:664–678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Kluger, Y, Peleg, K, Daniel-Aharonson, L, Mayo, A, et al. : The special injury pattern in terrorist bombings. J Am Coll Surg 2004;199:875–879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Frykberg, ER, Tepas, JJ, 3rd: Terrorist bombings: Lessons learned from Belfast to Beirut. Ann Surg 1988;208:569–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Mines, M, Thach, A, Mallonee, S, et al. : Ocular injuries sustained by survivors of the Oklahoma City bombing. Ophthalmology 2000;107:837–843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Thach, AB, Ward, TP, Hollifield, RD, et al. : Eye injuries in a terrorist bombing: Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, June 25, 1996. Ophthalmology 2000;107:844–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Hill, JF: Blast injury with particular reference to recent terrorist bombing incidents. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1979;61:4–11.Google ScholarPubMed
13.Frykberg, ER, Tepas, JJ 3rd, Alexander, RH: The 1983 Beirut Airport terrorist bombing: Injury patterns and implications for disaster management. Am Surg 1989;55:134–141.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Rodoplu, U, Arnold, JL, Yucel, T, et al. : Impact of the terrorist bombings of the Hong Kong Shanghai Bank headquarters and the British Consulate on two hospitals in Istanbul, Turkey, in November 2003. J Trauma 2005;59:195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Arnold, JL, Halpern, P, Tsai, MC, Smithline, H: Mass casualty terrorist bombings: A comparison of outcomes by bombing type. Ann Emerg Med 2004;43:263–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Quenemoen, LE, Davis, YM, Malilay, J, et al. : The World Trade Center bombing: Injury prevention strategies for high-rise building fires. Disasters 1996;20:125–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Aharonson-Daniel, L, Waisman, Y, Dannon, YL, et al. : Epidemiology of terror-related versus non-terror-related traumatic injury in children. Pediatrics 2003;112:e280.Google Scholar
18.Quintana, DA, Parker, JR, Jordan, FB, et al. : The spectrum of pediatric injuries after a bomb blast. J Pediatr Surg 1997;32:307–310; discussion 310–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Fahy, RF, Proulx, G: Collective common sense: A study of human behavior during the World Trade Center evacuation. NFPA Jrnl 1995:59.Google Scholar
20.Leibovici, D, Gofrit, ON, Stein, M, et al. : Blast injuries: Bus versus open-air bombings—A comparative study of injuries in survivors of open-air versus confined-space explosions. J Trauma 1996;41:1030–1035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Dellinger, AM, Waxweiler, RJ, Mallonee, S: Injuries to rescue workers following the Oklahoma City bombing. Am J Ind Med 1997;31:727–732.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Hogan, DE, Waeckerle, JF, Dire, DJ, Lillibridge SR: Emergency department impact of the Oklahoma City terrorist bombing. Ann Emerg Med 1999;34:160–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Oklahoma Department of Civil Emergency Management: After Action Report, Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building Bombing, 19 April 1995 in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Oklahoma City: Department of Central Services Central Printing Division, 1995.Google Scholar
25.Almogy, G, Luria, T, Richter, E, et al. : Can external signs of trauma guide management?: Lessons learned from suicide bombing attacks in Israel. Arch Surg 2005;140:390–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Pfefferbaum, B, Vinekar, SS, Trautman, RP, et al. : The effect of loss and trauma on substance use behavior in individuals seeking support services after the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. Ann Clin Psychiatry 2002;14:89–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.North, CS, Nixon, SJ, Shariat, S, et al. : Psychiatric disorders among survivors of the Oklahoma City bombing. JAMA 1999;282:755–762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Glenshaw, MT, Vernick, JS, Li, G, et al. : Fatalities in building bombing injuries. What can we learn from the Oklahoma City bombing? Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2007:1:27–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Glenshaw, MT, Vernick, JS, Li, G, et al. : Factors associated with injury severity in Oklahoma City bombing survivors. J Trauma (in press).Google Scholar
30. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Evacuation plans and procedures. Available at http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/evacuation/evac.html#Procedures. Accessed 07 February 2008.Google Scholar
31.Hazinski, MF, Idris, AH, Kerber, RE: Lay rescuer automated external defibrillator (“publicaccess defibrillation”) programs, lessons learned from an international multicenter trial. Circulation 2005:111:3336–3340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Federal Emergency Management Association: Escape from fire—Once you're out, stay out! Available at http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/downloads/pdf/publications/fa-246-508.pdf. Accessed 07 February 2008.Google Scholar
33.Pollack, KM, Cheskin, LJ: Obesity and workplace traumatic injury: Does the science support the link? Inj Prev 2007;13:297–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed