Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T13:23:04.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fuel Use in a Large, Dynamically Deployed Emergency Medical Services System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2011

Jeremy J. Hess  and
Lawrence A. Greenberg
Jeremy J. Hess*
Affiliation:
Grady Health Systems Emergency Medical Service, Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
Lawrence A. Greenberg
Affiliation:
Grady Health Systems Emergency Medical Service, Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Correspondence: Jeremy Hess, MD, MPH 151 Olympic PlaceDecature, GA 30030 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency medical services (EMS) systems are a central component of the healthcare system, particularly for older patients. As currently configured, EMS transport is fundamentally petroleum dependent. Petroleum scarcity is an emerging public health concern, particularly for patient transport. Little is known regarding EMS fuel use, potential impacts of scarcity on operations, or strategies to minimize these impacts.

Objective: The objective of this study was to characterize the fuel use of a large, urban, hospital-based, dynamically-deployed EMS system, and to identify broad optimization categories to minimize EMS’s petroleum dependence.

Methods: Fuel use was reviewed retrospectively using fuel purchasing and maintenance data from January 2007 through September 2008. Data on unit-hours, call volume, and patient transports also were collected. Data were processed using descriptive statistics.

Results: During the study period, a fleet of 35 diesel ambulances operated for 277,849 unit-hours and traveled 1,902,710 miles. Detailed mileage data were available for 66,527 unit-hours, 23.9% of the sample. Overall, vehicles averaged 6.6.89 (6.71, 7.08) miles per gallon (mpg), 11.5 (10.4, 12.6) miles were travelled per call, and 16.2 (14.8, 17.6) miles per transport; 2.7 (2.4, 2.9) gallons of fuel were used per transport.

Conclusions: In this EMS system, operations are fundamentally dependent on petroleum. Mileage estimates can serve as a baseline to evaluate interventions for reducing petroleum dependence and in contingency planning. As cost pressures increase and these interventions become more common, systematic evaluations will be important.

Keywords

ambulanceconversion of energy resourcesefficiencyemergency medical servicesenergy efficiencypetroleumrisk managementtransport
Type
Brief Report
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 26 , Issue 5 , October 2011 , pp. 394 - 398
Copyright
Copyright Hess © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Pitts, S, Niska, R, Xu, J, et al: National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Summary: 2006 Emergency Department Summary. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2008.Google ScholarPubMed
Shah, MN, Bazarian, JJ, Lerner, EB, et al: The epidemiology of emergency medical services use by older adults: An analysis of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14(5):441–447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Population Division. Table 2. Projections of the Population by Selected Age Groups and Sex for the United States: 2010 to 2050 (NP2008-T2). US Census Bureau; 2008.Google Scholar
Department of Energy: Strategic Petroleum Reserve Inventory. Department of Energy. Available at http://www.spr.doe.gov/dir/dir.html. Accessed 21 January 2009.Google Scholar
Hirsch, R, Bezdek, R, Wendling, R: Peaking of world oil production: Impacts, mitigation, & risk management. Science Applications International Corporation for the US Department of Energy; 2005.Google Scholar
Frumkin, H, Hess, J, Vindigni, S: Peak petroleum and public health. JAMA 10 October 2007;298(14):1688–1690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanchard, I, Brown, L, North American EMS Emissions Study Group: Carbon Footprinting of North American Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Systems. National Association of EMS Providers. Phoenix, AZ; 2010.Google Scholar
Jackson, R, Naumoff Shields, K: Preparing the US health community for climate change. Annu Rev Public Health 2008;29:57–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization: Healthy Hospitals, Healthy Planet, Healthy People: Addressing Climate Change in Healthcare Settings. Geneva: World Health Organization and Health Care Without Harm; 2009.Google Scholar
Frumkin, H, Hess, J, Luber, G, et al: Climate change: The public health response. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(3):435–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, D: Energy contingency planning for health facilities: conference report. Public Health Reports 1980;95(1):58–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, SC: The green machine. Development of a high-efficiency, low-pollution EMS response vehicle. JEMS 2008;33(7):108–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamson, J, Knapp, P, Hubbard, G, et al: Transport costs cut—Experience with LPG. Hospital Engineering 1984;38(1):9–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Phebus, W: How much are you paying for fuel? J Air Med Trans 1991;10(4):11–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babar, I, Rinker, R: Direct patient care during an acute disaster: Chasing the will-o’-the-wisp. Crit Care 2006;10(1):206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, KR, Herzog, P, Smolinske, S, et al: Demand for poison control center services “surged” during the 2003 blackout. Clin Toxicol 2007;45(3):248–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, IL: Hurricane Katrina’s impact on Tulane’s teaching hospitals. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 2007;118:69–78.Google Scholar
Gellerstedt, M, Bang, A, Herlitz, J: Could a computer-based system including a prevalence function support emergency medical systems and improve the allocation of life support level? Eur J Emerg Med 2006;13(5):290–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinchey, P, Myers, B, Zalkin, J, et al: Low acuity EMS dispatch criteria can reliably identify patients without high-acuity illness or injury. Prehosp Emerg Care 2007;11(1):42–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knapp, BJ, Tsuchitani, SN, Sheele, JM, et al: Prospective evaluation of an emergency medical services-administered alternative transport protocol. Prehosp Emerg Care 2009;13(4):432–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlachta-Fairchild, L: Telehealth: A new venue for health care delivery. Semin Oncol Nurs 2001;17(1):34–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McConnochie, K: Potential of telemedicine in pediatric primary care. Pediat Rev 2006;27(9):e58–e65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meaux, L: Acadian Ambulance unveils new, fuel-efficient emergency vehicle. Acadiana Gazette, 29 October 2008.Google Scholar
Lin, CS, Chang, H, Shyu, KG, et al: A method to reduce response times in prehospital care: The motorcycle experience. Am J Emerg Med 1998;16(7):711–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soares-Oliveira, M, Egipto, P, Costa, I, et al: Emergency motorcycle: Has it a place in a medical emergency system? Am J Emerg Med 2007;25(6):620–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiefe, CC, Soares-Oliveira, M: Medical emergency motorcycles: Are they safe? Eur J Emerg Med 2008;15(1):40–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harkness, D: The Great Green Ambulance. Available at http://greatgreenambulance.com/?page_id=7. Accessed 04 March 2010.Google Scholar
US Department of Energy, US Environmental Protection Agency: Model Year 2010 Fuel Economy Guide. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, and US Environmental Protection Agency; 2010.Google Scholar
Dodge Corporation: Dodge Sprinter. Available at http://www.dodge.com/en/2009/sprinter/low_cost/fuel_economy/. Accessed 04 March 2010.Google Scholar
Lammert, M: Twelve-Month Evaluation of UPS Diesel Hybrid Electric Delivery Vans. Golden, Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory of the US Department of Energy; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar