Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T11:03:16.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The First 24 Hours of the World Trade Center Attacks of 2001—The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Emergency Phase Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Miguel A. Cruz ,
Ronald Burger  and
Mark Keim
Miguel A. Cruz*
Affiliation:
Office of Terrorism Preparedness and Emergency Response, National Center for Environmental Health, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia USA
Ronald Burger
Affiliation:
Office of Terrorism Preparedness and Emergency Response, National Center for Environmental Health, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia USA
Mark Keim
Affiliation:
Office of Terrorism Preparedness and Emergency Response, National Center for Environmental Health, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia USA
*
Miguel Cruz, MPH Office of Terrorism Preparedness and Emergency Response National Center for Environmental Health Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 4770 Buford Highway, F-29 Atlanta, GA 30341 USA E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

On 11 September 2001, terrorists hijacked two passenger planes and crashed them into the two towers of the World Trade Center (WTC) in New York City. These synchronized attacks were the largest act of terrorism ever committed on US soil. The impacts, fires, and subsequent collapse of the towers killed and injured thousands of people.Within minutes after the first plane crashed into the WTC, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, Georgia, initiated one of the largest public health responses in its history. Staff of the CDC provided technical assistance on several key public health issues. During the acute phase of the event, CDC personnel assisted with: (1) assessing hospital capacity; (2) establishing injury and disease surveillance activities; (3) deploying emergency coordinators/liaisons to facilitate inter-agency coordination with the affected jurisdictions; and (4) arranging rapid delivery of emergency medical supplies, therapeutics, and personal protective equipment. This incident highlighted the need for adequate planning for all potential hazards and the importance of interagency and interdepartmental coordination in preparing for and responding to public health emergencies.

Keywords

emergency phaseresponseWorld Trade Center
Type
Special Report
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 22 , Issue 6 , December 2007 , pp. 473 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cable News Network: Day of terror. Available at http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/day.section.html. Accessed 22 September 2006.Google Scholar
2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Rapid assessment of injuries among survivors of the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center–New York City, September 2001.MMWR 2002;51(01):1–5.Google Scholar
3.US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Deaths in World Trade Center terrorist attacks–New York City, September 2001. MMWR 2002;51(01):1–5.Google Scholar
4. US Fire Administration, US Department of Homeland Security: The World Trade Center bombing: Report and analysis. USFA-TR-076. Available at http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/downloads/pdf/publications/tr-076-508.pdf. Accessed 04 October 2006.Google Scholar
5.Holtz, TM, Leighton, J, Balter, S, Weiss, D, Blank, S, Weisfuse, I: The Public Health Response to the World Trade Center Disaster. In: Levy, BS, Sidel, VS (eds). Terrorism and Public Health.New York: Oxford University Press, 2003, pp 19–48.Google Scholar
6.Environmental Protection Agency: EPA's response to the World Trade Center collapse: Challenges, successes, and areas of improvement. Available at http://www.epa.gov/oig/reports/2003/WTC_report_20030821.pdf. Accessed 22 September 2006.Google Scholar
7.Federal Emergency Management Agency: Federal emergency response plan. Available at http://www.fema.gov/rrr/frp/. Accessed 22 September 2006.Google Scholar
8.US Department of Homeland Security: National Response Plan. Available at http://www.dhs.gov/interweb/assetlibrary/NRPbaseplan.pdf. Accessed 22 September 2006.Google Scholar
9.US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Historical perspectives–History of US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR 1996;45(25):526–530.Google Scholar
10.Federal Bureau of Investigation: Terrorism in the United States. Available at http://www.fbi.gov/publications/terror/terroris.pdf. Accessed 22 September 2006.Google Scholar
11.Torok, TJ, Tauxe, RV, Wise, RP, et al. : A large community outbreak of salmonellosis caused by intentional contamination of restaurant salad bars. JAMA 1997;278(5):389–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Biological and chemical terrorism: Strategic plan for preparedness and response. Recommendations of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Strategic Planning Workgroup. MMWR 2000;49(RR-4):1–14.Google Scholar
13.Inglesby, TV, Grossman, R, O'Toole, T: A plague in your city: Observations from TOPOFF. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32(3):436–445.Google ScholarPubMed
14.US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Strategic National Stockpile.Available at http://www.bt.cdc.gov/stockpile. Accessed 22 September 2006.Google Scholar
15.Sharp, TW, Brennan, RJ, Keim, M, Williams, RJ, Eitzen, E, Lillibridge, S: Medical preparedness for a terrorist incident involving chemical or biological agents during the 1996 Atlanta Olympic Games. Ann Emerg Med 1998;32(2):214–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Morbidity surveillance following the Midwest flood—Missouri, 1993. MMWR 1993;42(41):797–798.Google Scholar
17.Association of State and Territorial Health Officials: 09.11.01. Phone lines and life lines: How New York reestablished contact on September 11, 2001. Available at http://www.astho.org/pubs/NYCpaper.pdf. Accessed 04 October 2006.Google Scholar
18.Havlak, R. Gorman, SE, Adams, SA: Challenges associated with creating a pharmaceutical stockpile to respond to a terrorist event. Clin Microbiol Infect 2002;8:529–533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Das, D, Weiss, D, Mostashari, F, et al. : Enhanced drop-in syndromic surveillance in New York City following September 11, 2001. J Urban Health 2003;80 (2 Suppl 1):i76–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Health Alert Network: Terrorist activity response. HAN Message Archive. Available at http://www2a.cdc.gov/HAN/ArchiveSys/ViewMsgV. asp?AlertNum=0000. Accessed 22 September 2006.Google Scholar
21.US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: The Laboratory Response Network– Partners in preparedness. Available at http://www.bt.cdc.gov/lrn/. Accessed 22 September 2006.Google Scholar
22.Wetter, WA, Silvers, MJ, Humbaugh, KE:Community response and testing of the national pharmaceutical stockpile in a metropolitan area: The Hanuman Redux Exercise, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Louisville, KY, August 2001. Available at: http://apha.confex. com/apha/130am/techprogram/paper_48165.htm. Accessed 22 September 2006.Google Scholar
23.US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Notice to readers: Ongoing investigation of anthrax—Florida, 2001. MMWR 2001;50(40):877.Google Scholar
24.Noji, EK: The public health consequences of disasters. Prehospital Disast Med 2000;15(4):147–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed