Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:18:10.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimation of the Demand for Hospital Care After a Possible High-Magnitude Earthquake in the City of Lima, Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2016

Celso Bambarén*
Affiliation:
School of Public Health and Administration, Cayetano Heredia University, Lima, Peru
Angela Uyen
Affiliation:
Institute of Tropical Medicine Alexander von Humboldt, Cayetano Heredia University, Lima, Peru
Miguel Rodriguez
Affiliation:
Independent Consultant, Rimac Seguros, Lima, Peru
*
Correspondence: Celso Bambarén, PhD Loma Verde130, Lima 33 Peru E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction

A model prepared by National Civil Defense (INDECI; Lima, Peru) estimated that an earthquake with an intensity of 8.0 Mw in front of the central coast of Peru would result in 51,019 deaths and 686,105 injured in districts of Metropolitan Lima and Callao. Using this information as a base, a study was designed to determine the characteristics of the demand for treatment in public hospitals and to estimate gaps in care in the hours immediately after such an event.

Methods

A probabilistic model was designed that included the following variables: demand for hospital care; time of arrival at the hospitals; type of medical treatment; reason for hospital admission; and the need for specialized care like hemodialysis, blood transfusions, and surgical procedures. The values for these variables were obtained through a literature search of the databases of the MEDLINE medical bibliography, the Cochrane and SciELO libraries, and Google Scholar for information on earthquakes over the last 30 years of over magnitude 6.0 on the moment magnitude scale.

Results

If a high-magnitude earthquake were to occur in Lima, it was estimated that between 23,328 and 178,387 injured would go to hospitals, of which between 4,666 and 121,303 would require inpatient care, while between 18,662 and 57,084 could be treated as outpatients. It was estimated that there would be an average of 8,768 cases of crush syndrome and 54,217 cases of other health problems. Enough blood would be required for 8,761 wounded in the first 24 hours. Furthermore, it was expected that there would be a deficit of hospital beds and operating theaters due to the high demand.

Conclusion

Sudden and violent disasters, such as earthquakes, represent significant challenges for health systems and services. This study shows the deficit of preparation and capacity to respond to a possible high-magnitude earthquake. The study also showed there are not enough resources to face mega-disasters, especially in large cities.

BambarénC, UyenA, RodriguezM. Estimation of the Demand for Hospital Care After a Possible High-Magnitude Earthquake in the City of Lima, Peru. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(1):106–111.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ramirez, M, Peek-Roast, C. Epidemiology of traumatic injuries from earthquakes. Epidemiol Rev. 2005;27:47-55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Bartels, S, VanRooyen, M. Medical complications associated with earthquakes. Lancet. 2012;379(9817):748-757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Mulvey, JM, Awan, SU, Qadri, AA, Maqsood, MA. Profile of injuries arising from the 2005 Kashmir Earthquake: the first 72 h. Injury. 2008;39(5):554-560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Karamouzian, S, Saeed, A, Ashraf-Ganjouei, K, Ebrahiminejad, A, Dehghani, MR, Asadi, AR. The neurological outcome of spinal cord injured victims of the Bam Earthquake, Kerman, Iran. Arch Iran Med. 2010;13(4):351-354.Google Scholar
5. Peek-Roast, C, Ramirez, M, Seligson, H, Shoaf, K. Seismic, structural, and individual factors associated with earthquake related injury. Inj Prevention. 2003;9(1):62-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Tavera, H. Evaluación del peligro asociado a los sismos y efectos secundarios en Perú. Lima, Perú: Geophysical Institute of Perú, Ministry of the Atmosphere; 2014: 20-35.Google Scholar
7. Tavera, H. Escenario de sismo y tsunami en el borde occidental de la región central del Perú. Lima, Perú: Instituto Geofísico del Perú, Ministerio del Ambiente; 2014: 15-23.Google Scholar
8. Instituto Nacional de Defensa Civil. Diseño de escenario sobre el impacto de un sismo de gran magnitud en Lima Metropolitana y Callao. Lima, Perú: INDECI; 2009: 15-44.Google Scholar
9. Peleg, K, Reuveni, H, Stein, M. Earthquake disasters. Lessons to be learned. Isr Med Assoc J. 2002;4(5):361-365.Google ScholarPubMed
10. Spence, R, So, E. Estimating Shaking-Induced Casualties and Building Damage for Global Earthquake Events. United Kingdom: Cambridge Architectural Research Ltd.; 2009: 23-35.Google Scholar
11. Yao, Y, Zhang, L, Cheng, X, Shen, Y, He, Y. Overview of wound features and treatment in Wenchuan earthquake victims. Open J Earthquake Research. 2014;3(2):100-107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Bulut, M, Fedakar, R, Akkose, S, Akgoz, S, Ozguc, H, Tokyay, R. Medical experience of a university hospital in Turkey after the 1999 Marmara earthquake. Emerg Med J. 2005;22(7):494-498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Xie, J, Du, L, Xia, T, Wang, M, Diao, X, Li, Y. Analysis of 1856 inpatient and 33 deaths in the West China hospital of Sichuan University from the Wenchuan earthquake. J Evid Based Med. 2008;1(1):20-26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Koehler, G, Foley, D, Jones, M. A computer simulation of a California casualty collection point used to response to a major earthquake. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1992;7(4):339-347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Oda, J, Tanaka, H, Yoshioka, T, et al. Analysis of 372 patients with crush syndrome caused by the Hanshin-Awaji earthquake. J Trauma. 1997;42(3):470-476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Li, Z, Wang, W, Chen, T. Blood transfusion therapy for 41 earthquake casualties. Transfus Apher Sci. 2009;41(3):179-181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Richards, NT, Tattersall, J, McCann, M, Samson, A, Mathias, T, Johnson, A. Dialysis for acute renal failure due to crush injuries after the Armenian earthquake. Br Med J. 1989;298(6671):443-445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Sever, MS, Erek, E, Vanholder, R, et al. The Marmara earthquake: epidemiological analysis of the victims with nephrological problems. Kidney Int. 2001;60(3):1114-1123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Kazancioglu, R, Pinarbasi, B, Esen, BA, Turkmen, A, Sever, MS. The need for blood products in patients with crush syndrome. Am J Disaster Med. 2010;5(5):295-301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Sever, M, Vanholder, R, Lameire, N. Management of crush-related injuries after disasters. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(10):1052-1063.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Phalkey, R, Reinhardt, JD, Marx, M. Injury epidemiology after the 2001 Gujarat earthquake in India: a retrospective analysis of injuries treated at a rural hospital in the Kutch district immediately after the disaster. Global Health Action. 2011;4(7):1-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Ferris, R. The cities facing the greatest danger of a mega-earthquake. CNBC Web site. http://www.cnbc.com/2015/04/29/the-cities-facing-the-greatest-danger-of-a-mega-earthquake.html. Accessed July 4, 2015.Google Scholar
23. World Health Organization. Earthquakes. Technical Hazard Sheet - Natural Disaster Profile. World Health Organization Web site. http://www.who.int/hac/techguidance/ ems/earthquakes/en/. Accessed June 20, 2015.Google Scholar
24. Coburn, AW, Spence, RJS, Pomonis, A. “Factors determining human casualty levels in earthquakes: mortality prediction in building collapse.” Paper presented at the First International Forum on Earthquake-related Casualties of the US Geological Survey; July 1992; Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
25. ATC-13. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Redwood City, California USA: Applied Technology Council; 1985: 12-28.Google Scholar
26. Shinar, E, Magen, D. National Blood Services disaster preparedness plan. National Blood Services; Israel.Google Scholar
27. Yahalom, V, Magen, D. Earthquakes and blood transfusion: a challenge. National Blood Services; Israel.Google Scholar