Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T14:52:12.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EMS at 3600 Meters: Exploring Barriers to Emergency Care and Transport in Rural Andean Perú

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2021

Alison H. Vasa Open the ORCID record for Alison H. Vasa [Opens in a new window] ,
Karen A. Falkenstein  and
Wayne A. Centrone
Alison H. Vasa*
Affiliation:
Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon USA; Cook County Health, Emergency Medicine, Chicago, IllinoisUSA
Karen A. Falkenstein
Affiliation:
Health Bridges International, Portland, OregonUSA
Wayne A. Centrone
Affiliation:
Health Bridges International, Portland, OregonUSA
*
Alison H. Vasa, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Administrative Offices 1950 W Polk Street, 7th Floor Chicago, Illinois60612USA E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Given the demonstrated success of programs that bolster informal Emergency Medical Service (EMS) systems in other low- and middle-income counties (LMICs), this study aimed to explore formal and informal systems, practices, customs, and structures for emergency response and medical transport in Colca Valley, Perú while identifying possible opportunities for future intervention.

Methods:

Twenty-two interviews with first responders and community members were conducted in three mountain villages throughout rural Andean Colca Valley of Perú. Subjects were recruited based on profession and experience with medical emergencies in the area. Transcripts were entered into Dedoose, coded, and analyzed to identify themes.

Results:

Providers and community members shared similar perceptions on the most common barriers to emergency care and transport. Challenges experienced equally by both groups were identified as “structural problems,” such as lack of infrastructure, lack of structured care delivery, and unclear protocols.

Incongruities of responses between groups emerged with regard to certain barriers to care. Providers perceived baseline health education and use of home remedies as significant barriers to seeking care, which was not proportionally corroborated by community members. In contrast, 86% of community members cited lack of trust in health providers as a major barrier.

Community members often noted witnessing a high frequency of emergency events, their personal experiences of helping, and the formal utilization of lay providers. When specifically questioned on their willingness to engage in first aid training, all participants were in agreement.

Conclusion:

While structural changes such as increased infrastructure would likely be the most durable improvement, future interventions focused on both empowering community members and improving the relationship between the health center and the community would be beneficial in this community. Additionally, these interview data suggest that a layperson first aid training program would be feasible and well-received.

Keywords

emergency care prehospitalEmergency Medical Servicesglobal healthinternational health
Type
Research Report
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 36 , Issue 6 , December 2021 , pp. 788 - 792
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

World Health Organization. Injuries and violence: the facts 2014. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/149798. Published 2014. Accessed June 7, 2021.Google Scholar
Razzak, J, Usmani, MF, Bhutta, ZA. Global, regional, and national burden of emergency medical diseases using specific emergency disease indicators: analysis of the 2015 Global Burden of Disease Study. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(2):e000733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Debenham, S, Fuller, M, Stewart, M, Price, RR. Where there is no EMS: lay providers in Emergency Medical Services care - EMS as a public health priority. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(6):593–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jayaraman, S, Mabweijano, JR, Lipnick, MS, et al. Current patterns of prehospital trauma care in Kampala, Uganda and the feasibility of a lay-first-responder training program. World J Surg. 2009;33(12):2512–2521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wisborg, T, Murad, MK, Edvardsen, O, Husum, H. Prehospital trauma system in a low-income country: system maturation and adaptation during 8 years. J Trauma. 2008;64(5):1342–1348.Google Scholar
Dedoose Version 8.0.35. Web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data (2018). Los Angeles, California USA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC. www.dedoose.com. Accessed June 7, 2021.Google Scholar
Tran, TT, Lee, J, Sleigh, A, Banwell, C. Putting culture into prehospital emergency care: a systematic narrative review of literature from lower middle-income countries. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019;34(5):510–520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, EC, Pu, C, Chou, YJ, Huang, N. Public trust in physicians-health care commodification as a possible deteriorating factor: cross-sectional analysis of 23 countries. Inquiry. 2018;55:46958018759174.Google ScholarPubMed
Gopichandran, V, Chetlapali, SK. Trust in the physician-patient relationship in developing healthcare settings: a quantitative exploration. Indian J Med Ethics. 2015;12(3):141–148.Google ScholarPubMed
Schouten, BC, Meeuwesen, L. Cultural differences in medical communication: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64(1-3):21–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed