Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:26:00.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An International Expert Delphi Study to Determine Research Needs in Major Incident Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2012

Kevin Mackway-Jones  and
Simon Carley
Kevin Mackway-Jones
Affiliation:
Centre for Effective Emergency Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
Simon Carley*
Affiliation:
Centre for Effective Emergency Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
*
Correspondence: Simon Carley, MD, FRCS (Ed), FCEM Centre for Effective Emergency Care c/o Emergency Department Manchester Royal Infirmary Oxford Road Manchester M13 9WL UK E-mail [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To collate the opinions of experts and to reach consensus about the research priorities in the management of major incidents.

Design

A three-round e-Delphi study was conducted using an international panel of experts drawn from active researchers and active educators in major incident management. General areas for consideration were derived from the literature analysis undertaken as part of the overall project.

Results

Experts generated 221 statements in 11 topic areas in the first round. Fifty-one of these statements reached consensus in Round 2. A further 23 statements reached consensus in Round 3, leaving 147 statements that did not reach consensus.

Conclusions

An international expert panel reached consensus on 74 topics of research priority in major incidents management. The strongest themes within these topics were education and training, planning, and communication.

Mackway-Jones K, Carley S. An international expert Delphi study to determine research needs in major incident management. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012;27(4):1-8.

Keywords

accidentDelphi techniquedisasterdisaster planningmass-casualty incident
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , August 2012 , pp. 351 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. UK Government. Civil Contingencies Act. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/36/contents. Published 2004. Accessed June 22, 2012.Google Scholar
2. Carley, S, Mackway-Jones, K, Donnan, S. Major incidents in Britain over the past 28 years: the case for the centralised reporting of major incidents. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(6):392-398.Google Scholar
3. Potter, M, Miner, K, Barnett, D, et al. . The evidence base for effectiveness of preparedness training: a retrospective analysis. Public Health Rep. 2010;125(Supp 5):15-23.Google Scholar
4. Day, T, Challen, K, Walter, D. Major incident planning in primary care trusts in north-west England: a cross-sectional survey. Health Serv Manage Res. 2010;23(1):25-29.Google Scholar
5. Williams, J, Walter, D, Challen, K. Preparedness of emergency departments in northwest England for managing chemical incidents: a structured interview survey. BMC Emerg Med. 2007;7:20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Carley, S, Mackway-Jones, K. Are British hospitals ready for the next major incident? Analysis of hospital major incident plans. BMJ. 1996;313(7067):1242-1243.Google Scholar
7. Turoff, M, Hiltz, S. Computer based Delphi Processes. In: Adler M, Ziglio E, eds, Gazing into the Oracle: The Delphi Method and its Application to Social Policy and Public Health. Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley; 1996.Google Scholar
8. Turoff, M, Hiltz, S, White, C, Plotnick, L, Hendala, A, Xiang, Y. The Past as the Future of Emergency Preparedness and Management. In: ME J, ed, Crisis Response and Management and Emerging Information Systems: Critical Applications. Philadelphia: Information Resources Management Association; 2011.Google Scholar
9. Linstone, HA, Turoff, M. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Boston: Addison Wesley Publishing; 1975.Google Scholar
10. Likert, A. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 1932;22:55.Google Scholar
11. Goodman, CM. The Delphi technique: a critique. J Adv Nurs. 1987;12(6):729-734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Whitman, NI. The Delphi technique as an alternative for committee meetings. J Nurs Educ. 1990;29(8):377-379.Google Scholar
13. Carley, SD, Mackway-Jones, K, Donnan, S. Delphi study into planning for care of children in major incidents. [Review] [37 refs]. Arch Dis Child. 1999;80(5):406-409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Mackway-Jones, K, Carley, SD, Robson, J. Planning for major incidents involving children by implementing a Delphi study.[see comment]. Arch Dis Child. 1999;80(5):410-413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Carley, S, Mackway-Jones, K, Randic, L, Dunn, K. Planning for major burns incidents by implementing an accelerated Delphi technique. Burns. 2002;28(5):413-418.Google Scholar
16. Randic, L, Carley, S, Mackway-Jones, K, Dunn, K. Planning for major burns incidents in the UK using an accelerated Delphi technique. Burns. 2002;28(5):405-412.Google Scholar
17. Welling, L, Boers, M, Mackie, D, Patka, P, Bierens, J. A consensus process on management of major burns accidents: Lessons learned from the cafe fire in Volendam, The Netherlands. J Health Organ Manag. 2006;20(2-3):243-252.Google Scholar
18. Crawford, IW, Mackway-Jones, K, Russell, DR, Carley, SD. Planning for chemical incidents by implementing a Delphi based consensus study. Emerg Med J. 2004;21(1):20-23.Google Scholar
19. Crawford, IW, Mackway-Jones, K, Russell, DR, Carley, SD. Delphi based consensus study into planning for chemical incidents. Emerg Med J. 2004;21(1):24-28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Brown, N, Crawford, I, Carley, S, Mackway-Jones, K. A Delphi-based consensus study into planning for biological incidents. J Public Health (Oxf). 2006;28(3):238-241.Google Scholar
21. Mudalige, M, Carley, S, Mackway-Jones, K. Who's who at a major incident: standardising role titles for emergency planners. Emerg Med J. 2006;23(5):408-409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Bisson, J, Witteveen, A, Ajdukovic, D, Johansen, V, Orengo Farcia, F. TENTS Guidelines: development of post-disaster psychological care guidelines through a Delphi process. Br J Psych. 2010;196(1):69-74.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Mackway-Jones and Carley supplementary material

Appendices

Download Mackway-Jones and Carley supplementary material(File)
File 126 KB