Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T00:56:01.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

(A282) Comparison of Safety Index in Iranian Hospitals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2011

A. Djalali
Affiliation:
Clinical Science and Education, Stockholm, Sweden
A. Massumi
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Engineering, Tehran, Iran
G. Öhlen
Affiliation:
Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
M. Castren
Affiliation:
Clinical Science and Education, Stockholm, Sweden
L. Kurland
Affiliation:
Clinical Science and Education, Stockholm, Sweden
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Hospitals are highly complex facilities that play a key role in the medical response to disasters. However, they are susceptible to the impact of disasters with respect to their structural, non-structural and functional elements. Many hospitals have collapsed or been damaged and rendered nonfunctional as a consequence of disasters. The resilience of a hospital along with the capability of effective medical response to disasters is a key part of a community based disaster plan.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare hospitals in Iran with respect to safety.

Methods

This study was performed as a survey in four hospitals in Iran. The Hospital Safety Index package from WHO was used as an evaluation tool. The evaluation team consisted of: a PhD in structural engineering, an architect with a Master's degree, a specialist in electrical and mechanical maintenance, a medical doctor, a specialist in disaster management, and an expert in health care planning. The hospitals were evaluated in three elements; structural, non-structural, and organizational. The hospital safety calculator was used.

Results

The most important hazard for these hospitals was earthquakes. The structural safety at three hospitals was inadequate or at risk; and consequently needs intervention in a near future. Also, the administrative and organizational element of these hospitals was inadequate or at risk. All hospitals need intervention in the near future due to non-structural safety being inadequate. The overall safety index at one hospital was A (functional); in two hospitals B (at risk); and in one hospital C (inadequate).

Conclusions

The Iranian hospitals which had been assessed were on the whole unsafe. Also, these hospitals do not have a disaster management plan. Implementing a comprehensive disaster plan, including mitigation and a preparedness plan, would most likely enhance the safety of these hospitals.

Type
Abstracts of Scientific and Invited Papers 17th World Congress for Disaster and Emergency Medicine
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2011