(A153) Analysis of Chest Compressions: Measured Using the Quality Compression Index and Performance Disparities among Demographic Characteristics

Abstract

Introduction

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines throughout the world stress the importance of high quality chest compressions soon after cardiac arrest as the most significant factor in determining survival. Little evidence exists, internationally, documenting the quality of compressions provided by healthcare providers. In this study investigators sought to determine the quality of chest compressions delivered by rescuers. It was hypothesized that greater variably in compression quality exists between rescuers than variability in individual rescuers over time.

Methods

In this observational pilot study, basic life support (BLS) providers from prehospital and in-hospital settings were invited to participate in the investigation. Ten minutes of continuous chest compressions were recorded on the Resusci Anne and the Laerdal PC Skillreporting System. An adequate compression was defined as a compression with depth > 38mm, full chest recoil, and correct hand position. The Quality Compression Index (QCI) was developed to factor rate into the characteristics of an adequate compression. QCI is a scaled performance index calculated every 30 seconds.

Results

Providers came from a variety of clinical backgrounds, aged 35.5 ± 11.0 years. Of the 103 total participants, 94 (91.3%) completed 10 minutes of compressions. The most significant degradation in the quality of compressions occurred within the first two minutes. There was greater variability between different rescuers than the variability over time. Mean Square Error (MSE) due to subjects was comparatively greater than the MSE due to time (63.2 vs. 7.68). Performance of CPR, male sex, < 45 years of age, and prehospital background, correlated with higher quality. Time since last BLS certification and the number of times a rescuer completed a BLS class did not correlate with the quality.

Conclusions

Greater variability in the quality of compressions exists between different rescuers than a rescuer over time. Some participants were not able to deliver ideal compressions from the start, when the effects of fatigue were minimal.