Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:38:06.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural analysis of Ba0.8Sr0.2Ti0.6Zr0.3Mn0.1O3 ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2023

G. Murugesan
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R and D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 600062, Tamil Nadu, India
Nandhan K. R.*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Jain University, Bangalore 562112, Karnataka, India
N. Maruthi
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Jain University, Bangalore 562112, Karnataka, India
A. Muthuraja
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Theivanai Ammal College for Women (Autonomous), Villupuram, Tamil Nadu, India
Saraswathi Bhaskar
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R and D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 600062, Tamil Nadu, India
M. Manigandan
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R and D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 600062, Tamil Nadu, India Department of Physics, Government Arts and Science College, Thiruvennainallur, Villupuram, Tamil Nadu, India
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Polycrystalline Ba0.8Sr0.2Ti0.6Zr0.3Mn0.1O3 was synthesized by solid-state reaction at 1600°C. The single phase formation of the compound without any impurities was confirmed by the X-ray diffraction technique. The prepared compound crystallized to a cubic structure with a space group of Pm-3m and the refined lattice parameters were a = b = c = 4.0253 Ǻ, α = β = γ = 90°. Rietveld refinement was carried for the powder XRD data using GSAS software and the experimental data peaks were indexed by Powder X software.

Type
New Diffraction Data
Copyright
Copyright © Jain (Deemed-to-be University), Bangalore, 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Centre for Diffraction Data

I. INTRODUCTION

Barium titanate ceramics have gained lot of attention in the scientific community due to the variation of properties due to the doping in barium or titanium sites (Levin et al., Reference Levin, Cockayne, Krayzman, Woicik, Lee and Randall2011). Due to its non-toxic behavior, BaTiO3 is a better alternative to lead-based materials (Xue et al., Reference Xue, Zhou, Bao, Gao, Zhou and Ren2011). BaTiO3 possess superior ferroelectric behavior and has three phase transitions at different temperature regimes. At around −80°C, it transforms from rhombohedral to orthorhombic, at around 5°C, it transforms from orthorhombic to tetragonal, and at around 130°C, it transforms from tetragonal to cubic (Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Vilarinho and Baptista1999). The temperature for phase transformation in BaTiO3 shifts due to the A-site doping of Sr2+ or Ca2+ and B-site doping of Mn4+, Fe2+, Zr4+, and Nb5+ making it suitable for high- or low-temperature piezoelectric device fabrication (Sindhu et al., Reference Sindhu, Ahlawat, Sanghi, Kumari and Agarwal2013). The B-site substitution of Zirconium tunes the dielectric behavior of BaTiO3 and increases its permittivity (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Rong, Wang and Yao2014). The substitution of Mn and Zr in B-site leads to the formation of oxygen vacancy due to the charge imbalance and these oxygen vacancies induce magnetism in ceramics (Das et al., Reference Das, Rout, Pradhan and Roul2012).

The variation of Strontium content in BaTiO3 shifts the transition and alters the electrical properties. Earlier reports have suggested that the doping of strontium in barium site leads to a transformation in the crystal structure from tetragonal to cubic (Sindhu et al., Reference Sindhu, Ahlawat, Sanghi, Kumari and Agarwal2013). The smaller ionic radii of Sr2+ (1.44 Å) in comparison with Ba2+ (1.61 Å) has led to the reduction of c/a ratio and shifting of tetragonal structure to ideal cubic structure (Yu et al., Reference Yu, Zou, Cao, Wang, Li and Yao2015). In our sample, we also experienced the transformation of crystal structure from tetragonal to cubic due to the increasing strontium concentration. The crystal structure for Ba1-xSrxTi0.6Zr0.3Mn0.1O3 exhibited a tetragonal structure for x = 0 while for x = 0.2 the crystal structure transformed to an ideal cubic structure (Nandan and Kumar, Reference Nandan and Kumar2017). Generally, BaTiO3 exhibits cubic structure at around 130°C, but in our case due to the strontium doping, we were able to achieve cubic structure at room temperature. This raised our interest to analyze the powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) data and herein we are reporting the powder XRD pattern for BSTO samples.

II. EXPERIMENTAL

A. Synthesis

Polycrystalline samples of Ba0.8Sr0.2Ti0.6Zr0.3Mn0.1O3 (BSTO) were prepared by a standard solid-state reaction method. Initially, precursors barium carbonate, strontium carbonate, titanium dioxide, zirconium oxide, and manganese oxides were weighed in stoichiometric ratios and mixed by a ball milling process. The homogeneous mixture was calcined up to 1550°C in air atmosphere with intermediate grindings. The experimental procedures are detailed in our previous report (Nandan and Kumar, Reference Nandan and Kumar2017).

B. Data collection

Powder XRD data of the samples were measured using a Bruker D8 Advance (Germany) diffractometer. The sintered powders were ground and loaded in a zero background (911) Si single-crystal wafer holder. The instrument was operated in Bragg-Brentano geometry with fixed slits. The diffraction data for the sample was recorded using Cu K-alpha-1 (λ = 1.54060 Å), K-alpha-2 (λ = 1.54439 Å), and K-beta (λ = 1.39222 Å) radiation as the source which is operated at a voltage of 40 kV and a current of 30 mA with a goniometer radius of 217.5 mm. The data were recorded at a 2θ range from 10° to 80° with a step size of 0.015°.

III. RESULTS

The refined powder XRD pattern for the BSTO samples is shown in Figure 1. Rietveld refinement for the diffraction data were carried by using GSAS-II program (Toby and Von Dreele, Reference Toby and Von Dreele2013). The initial structural parameters for refinement were taken from previous reports (Kim et al., Reference Kim, Jung and Ryu2004). The background was modeled using a Chebyshev polynomial. The fixed positional and isotropic displacement parameters were constrained for Ba and Sr to be the same and Ti, Zr, and Mn to be the same. Site occupancies were set and held fixed to the values determined by weights of the various starting materials mixed together and calcined given that no impurity phases evolved, even when sintered at higher temperatures. The powder data fitted well for Pm-3m space group and the fractional coordinates are shown in Table I. The results of the refinement (lattice parameter and R factors) are shown in Table II. The crystal structure of BSTO has been elucidated by Vesta software and shown as the inset in Figure 1 (Momma and Izumi, Reference Momma and Izumi2013). The experimental data were also indexed by Powder X software (Dong, Reference Dong1999) and the results of the refined parameters are shown in Tables II and III. K-alpha-2 stripping has been done before peak indexing in Powder X software. The various metal–oxygen bond lengths from the refined data are given in Table IV.

Figure 1. Rietveld refinement of powder XRD data of BSTO polycrystalline sample. The inset shows the BSTO crystal structure.

TABLE I. Fractional coordinates for BSTO samples.

TABLE II. Crystal data from GSAS program and Powder X software.

TABLE III. Powder diffraction data of BSTO polycrystalline material.

TABLE IV. Selected bond lengths for BSTO samples.

IV. CONCLUSION

Polycrystalline samples of BSTO are prepared by a conventional solid-state reaction. Powder XRD patterns for the prepared sample confirmed the single-phase formation of the compound without any impurities. The prepared sample crystallized in a cubic structure (Pm-3m space group) with lattice parameters a = b = c = 4.0253 Ǻ, α = β = γ = 90°. Rietveld refinement for the XRD pattern was done by GSAS program and the peak indexing was carried out by Powder X software.

V. DEPOSITED DATA

The Crystallographic Information Framework (CIF) file was deposited with the ICDD. The data can be requested at .

References

REFERENCES

Das, S. K., Rout, P. P., Pradhan, S. K., and Roul, B. K.. 2012. “Effect of Equiproprotional Substitution of Zn and Mn in BaTiO3 Ceramic—An Index to Multiferroic Applications.” Journal of Advanced Ceramics 1 (3): 241–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, C. 1999. “PowderX: Windows-95-Based Program for Powder X-Ray Diffraction Data Processing.” Journal of Applied Crystallography 32: 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. I., Jung, J. K., and Ryu, K. S.. 2004. “Structural Study of Nano BaTiO3 Powder by Rietveld Refinement.” Materials Research Bulletin 39 (7–8): 1045–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I., Cockayne, E., Krayzman, V., Woicik, J. C., Lee, S., and Randall, C. A.. 2011. “Local Structure of Ba (Ti,Zr)O3 Perovskite-like Solid Solutions and Its Relation to the Band-Gap Behavior.” Physical Review B 83 (9): 094122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Momma, K., and Izumi, F.. 2013. “VESTA 3 for Three-Dimensional Visualization of Crystal, Volumetric and Morphology Data.” Journal of Applied Crystallography 44: 1272–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandan, K. R., and Kumar, A. R.. 2017. “Effect of Sr-Doping on Structure and Electrical Properties of (Ba1−xSrxTi0.6Zr0.3Mn0.1O3)x=0.1 and 0.2 Synthesized by Solid State Reaction.” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 28 (10): 7221–30.Google Scholar
Sindhu, M., Ahlawat, N., Sanghi, S., Kumari, R., and Agarwal, A.. 2013. “Crystal Structure Refinement and Investigation of Electrically Heterogeneous Microstructure of Single Phased Sr Substituted BaTiO3 Ceramics.” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 575: 109–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toby, B. H., and Von Dreele, R. B.. 2013. “GSAS-II: The Genesis of a Modern Open-Source All Purpose Crystallography Software Package.” Journal of Applied Crystallography 46 (2): 544–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Rong, G., Wang, T., and Yao, H.. 2014. “Impact of Sr on the Performance of BaTi0.9Zr0.1O3–BaTiO3 Dielectric Powders.” Modern Physics Letters B 28 (14): 1450114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, D., Zhou, Y., Bao, H., Gao, J., Zhou, C., and Ren, X.. 2011. “Large Piezoelectric Effect in Pb-free Ba(Ti,Sn)O3-x(Ba,Ca)TiO3 Ceramics.” Applied Physics Letters 99 (12): 122901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Y., Zou, H., Cao, Q. F., Wang, X. S., Li, Y. X., and Yao, X.. 2015. “Phase Transitions and Relaxation Behaviors in Barium Strontium Titanate Ceramics Determined by Dynamic Mechanical and Dielectric Analysis.” Ferroelectrics 487 (1): 7785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, L., Vilarinho, P. M., and Baptista, J. L.. 1999. “Dependence of the Structural and Dielectric Properties of Ba1–xSrxTiO3 Ceramic Solid Solutions on Raw Material Processing.” Journal of the European Ceramic Society 19 (11): 2015–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Rietveld refinement of powder XRD data of BSTO polycrystalline sample. The inset shows the BSTO crystal structure.

Figure 1

TABLE I. Fractional coordinates for BSTO samples.

Figure 2

TABLE II. Crystal data from GSAS program and Powder X software.

Figure 3

TABLE III. Powder diffraction data of BSTO polycrystalline material.

Figure 4

TABLE IV. Selected bond lengths for BSTO samples.