Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:46:44.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A semi-empirical asymmetry function for X-ray diffraction peak profiles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

P. Riello ,
P. Canton  and
G. Fagherazzi
P. Riello
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Chimica Fisica, Università di Venezia, DD 2137, 30123 Venezia, Italy
P. Canton
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Chimica Fisica, Università di Venezia, DD 2137, 30123 Venezia, Italy
G. Fagherazzi*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Chimica Fisica, Università di Venezia, DD 2137, 30123 Venezia, Italy
*
a)To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new semi-empirical approximation for the asymmetry function to be used in the X-ray Rietveld analysis has resulted in lower values of the so-called goodness-of-fit index, defined as S = Rwp/Rexp, where Rwp is the R-weighted pattern and Rexp is the R-expected [R. A. Young, The Rietveld Method (Oxford U.P., Oxford, 1993)], with respect to the corresponding values obtained with the classical approximation used by Rietveld in his fundamental paper. A comparing test of the two asymmetry functions was carried out for the cubic Y2O3 and for αAl2O3 using either pseudo-Voigt or Pearson VII symmetrical functions and two diffractometers. As in the case of the Rietveld approximation, the present one, which employs an exponential function, is optimized using only one fitting parameter. Experimentally, the asymmetry can be considerably diminished by using Soller slits with a small opening angle (≤2°).

Keywords

asymmetry functionRietveld analysispowder diffractionpeak fitting
Type
Research Article
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 204 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bérar, J. F., and Baldinozzi, G. (1993). “Modeling of line-shape asymmetry in powder diffraction,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caglioti, G., Paoletti, A., and Ricci, F. P. (1958). “Choice of collimators for a crystal spectrometer for neutron diffraction,” Nucl. Instrum. 3, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J., and Fischer, R. X. (1990). “Profile agreement indices in Rietveld and pattern-fitting analysis,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 23, 462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J., and Madsen, I. C. (1987). “Data collection strategies for constant wavelength Rietveld analysis,” Powder Diffr. 2, 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, C. J. (1982). “The approximation of asymmetric neutron powder diffraction peaks by sums of Gaussians,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 15, 615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, E., Schäfer, W., and Will, G. (1994). “R values in analysis of powder diffraction data using Rietveld refinement,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 27, 492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khattak, C. P., and Cox, D. E. (1977). “Profile analysis of X-ray powder diffractometer data: structural refinement of Lao0.75Sr0.25CrO3,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 10, 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langford, J. I., Louër, D., Sonneveld, E. J., and Visser, J. W. (1986). “Applications of total pattern fitting to a study of crystallite size and strain in zinc oxide powder,” Powder Diffr. 1, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmros, G., and Thomas, J. O. (1977). “Least-squares structure refinement based on profile analysis of powder film intensity data measured on an automatic microdensitometer,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 10, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, B. H., and Valentine, T. M. (1969). “A neutron diffraction study of the crystal structure of the C-form of yttrium sesquioxide,” Acta Crystallogr. B 25, 2140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rietveld, H. M. (1969). “A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scardi, P., Lutterotti, L., and Maistrelli, P. (1994). “Experimental determination of the instrumental broadening in the Bragg–Brentano geometry,” Powder Diffr. 9, 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, R. A. (1993). “Introduction to the Rietveld method,” in The Rietveld Method, edited by Young, R. A. (IUCR, Oxford U. P., Oxford), pp. 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiles, D. B., and Young, R. A. (1981). “A new computer program for Rietveld analysis of X-ray powder diffraction patterns,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 14, 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar