Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:40:55.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A proposed change to determining the Pearson Symbol Code

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Peter Bayliss
Peter Bayliss
Affiliation:
Mineralogy, Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney 2000, N.S.W., Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

More isostructural compounds would have the same Pearson Symbol Code (PSC) if the hydrogen atom is not counted in computing the numeric portion of the PSC.

Type
Technical Articles
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 2000 , pp. 217
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hubbard, C. R., and Calvert, L. D. (1981). “The Pearson Symbol,” Bull. Alloy Phase Diagrams 2, 153–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClune, W. F., Ed. (1992). “The Pearson Symbol and Pearson Symbol Code,” Metals & Alloys Indexes, Appendix A (ICDD, Newtown Square, PA 19073-3273), p. 10.Google Scholar
Smith, D. K., Roberts, A. C., Bayliss, P., and Liebau, F. (1998). “A systematic approach to general and structure-type formulas for minerals and other inorganic phases,” Am. Mineral. 83, 126–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar