Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:37:26.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of preferential orientation in zirconium samples deformed by uniaxial tension using neutron and X-ray diffraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2015

M. Kučeráková*
Affiliation:
Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic
S. Vratislav
Affiliation:
Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic
L. Kalvoda
Affiliation:
Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic
Z. Trojanová
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Czech Republic
*
a) Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Two series of zirconium samples were investigated by neutron and X-ray diffraction. First series of the samples was deformed at room temperature (RT), whereas the second series was deformed at 300 °C. Both series were deformed on uniaxial tensile machine INSTRON 5882 from strain 0 to 30% (strain step was 5%). The neutronographic texture measurements were performed on the KSN-2 neutron diffractometer located at the research reactor LVR-15 in the Nuclear Research Institute, plc. Rez, Czech Republic. The X-ray measurements were performed at the theta/theta X'Pert PRO diffractometer with the Cr X-ray tube. Observed data were processed by the software packages GSAS and X'Pert Texture. Preferential orientation of the $\left({10\bar 10} \right)$ and $\left({11\bar 20} \right)$ plane poles is found to be parallel to the rolling direction for both tested deformation series. Poles of the $\lpar 10\bar 12\rpar $ and $\lpar 10\bar 13\rpar $ planes tend to be parallel to the normal direction (Tables II and III). Orientation of the basal poles is tilted by 45° from the normal direction toward the transverse direction. Sharpness of the resulting texture increases with extends of the applied deformation as well as with rise of the tensile test temperature from the RT level to 300 °C.

Type
Technical Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, V. M., Quinta da Fonseca, J., Preuss, M., Robson, J. D., Daymond, M. R., and Comstock, R. J. (2009). “Determination and interpretation of texture evolution during deformation of a zirconium alloy,” J. ASTM Int., 5, 377390.Google Scholar
Horta, R. M. S. B., Roberts, W. T., and Wilson, D. V. (1969). Texture representation by inverse pole figures. In Transactions of the Metallurgical Society of AIME, 245 (12), 2525.Google Scholar
Larson, A. C. and Von Dreele, R. B. (1997). General Structure Analysis System (GSAS) (Report LAUR 86-748). Los Alamos, New Mexico: Los Alamos National Laboratory.Google Scholar
Murty, K. L. (1989). “Applications of crystallographic textures of zirconium alloys in the nuclear industry,” in Zirconium in the nuclear industry: Eighth Int. Symp., American Society for testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp. 570595.Google Scholar
Santisteban, J. R., Vicente-Alvarez, M. A., Vizcaino, P., Banchik, A. D., Vogel, S. C., Tremsin, A. S., Vallerga, J. V., McPhate, J. B., Lehmann, E., and Kockelmann, W. (2012). “Texture imaging of zirconium based components by total neutron cross-section experiments,” J. Nucl. Mater. 425, 218227.Google Scholar
Tenckhoff, E. (2005). “Review of deformation mechanism,” J. ASTM Int. 2, 2550.Google Scholar
Vetvicka, I (2014). “Effect of creep and α-Zr ↔ (α + β)-Zr transition in Zr1Nb cladding on texture analyzed by neutron diffraction,” J. Nucl. Mater. 453, 196201.Google Scholar