Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:38:32.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-ray powder diffraction characterization of iron microparticles on a Bruker SMART1000 single-crystal X-ray diffractometer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2012

Joseph H. Reibenspies*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3255
Nattamai Bhuvanesh
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3255
*
a)Electronic mail: [email protected]

Abstract

A method to characterize iron oxide microparticles by microquantity X-ray powder diffraction is presented. The method employs small sections of acrylic tubing and double sided Mylar® tape that fits over a standard 170 mm collimator for a Bruker-AXS SMART 1000 or APEXII three-circle single-crystal diffractometer (Mo X-ray tube). The tubing will hold and position a sample that is placed on the double-sided Mylar® tape and allow for rapid specimen mounting/dismounting and data collection. The method is simple, portable, and readily adapted to a variety of single-crystal X-ray diffractometers.

Type
Laboratory Note
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bedanta, S. and Kleemann, W. (2009). “Supermagnetism,” J. Phys. DJPAPBE 42, 013001.10.1088/0022-3727/42/1/013001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhuvanesh, N. S. P. and Reibenspies, J. H. (2003). “A novel approach to micro-sample X-ray powder diffraction using nylon loops,” J. Appl. Crystallogr.JACGAR 36, 14801481.10.1107/S0021889803021885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EVA (2007). Bruker EVAluation of Powder Diffraction Data, version 14.0.0.0 (Bruker-AXS, Madison).Google Scholar
GADDS (2005). General Area Detector Diffraction System, version 4.1.21 (Bruker-AXS, Madison).Google Scholar
Jimenez-Lopez, C., Rodriguez-Navarro, A., Perez-Gonzalez, T., Carrollo-Rosua, J., Boyce, A. E., and Romanek, C. S. (2007). “New method for separation of magnetite from rock samples for oxygen isotope analysis,” Eur. J. Mineral.EJMIER 19, 717722.10.1127/0935-1221/2007/0019-1761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurent, S., Forge, D., Port, M., Roch, A., Robic, C., Elst, L. V., and Muller, R. N. (2008). “Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological application,” Chem. Rev. 108, 20642110.10.1021/cr068445eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massart, R. (1981). “Preparation of aqueous magnetic liquids in alkaline and acidic media,” IEEE Trans. Magn.IEMGAQ 17, 12471248.10.1109/TMAG.1981.1061188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCreery, G. L. (1949). “Improved mount for powdered specimens used on the Geiger-counter X-ray spectrometer,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc.JACTAW 32, 141146.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1949.tb18939.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
ICDD (2002). “Powder Diffraction File,” International Centre for Diffraction Data edited by McClune, W. F., Newtown Square, PA 19073-3272.Google Scholar
SMART (2005). Bruker Molecular Analysis Research Tool, version 6.632 (Bruker-AXS, Madison).Google Scholar