Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:58:04.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantitative Analysis of a Textured Coating by a New X-Ray Diffraction Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Mingyuan Gu  and
A.R. Marder
Mingyuan Gu
Affiliation:
Energy Research Center, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, U.S.A.
A.R. Marder
Affiliation:
Energy Research Center, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An iterative external standard method of X-ray diffraction is presented to overcome the difficulties of preferred orientation and peak overlap encountered in quantitative phase analysis. Instead of using only a single line intensity in the traditional external standard technique, all the reflection data are used in the calculation. The accuracy and applicability of this method was tested on a series of two-phase powder mixtures with known composition. The results show markedly good agreement with the actual values. As an example, the analysis was applied to the data collected from an as plated electrodeposited Zn-Fe coating. The determined phase composition of the coating was found to be 88.2 +/− 5.3 wt % δ-phase and 11.8 +/− 0.7 wt % η -phase.

Type
Research Article
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 89 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnell, R.D. (1968). J. Iron Steel Inst., 206, 1035–1036.Google Scholar
Bablik, H., Götzl, F. & Halla, F. (1938). Z. Metallkde. 30, 249–252.Google Scholar
Bastin, G.F., van Loo, F.J.J., & Rieck, G.D. (1974). Z. Metallkde. 65, 656–660.Google Scholar
Byström-Asklund, A.M. (1966). Amer. Mineral. 51, 1233–1237.Google Scholar
Cullity, B.D. (1978). Elements of X-Ray Diffraction. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison -Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 408.Google Scholar
Davidson, D.D. (1987). Private communication, Chrysler Motors Corp., Detroit.Google Scholar
Dickson, M.J. (1969). J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2, 176–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durnin, J. & Ridal, K.A. (1968). J. Iron Steel Inst. 206, 60.Google Scholar
Gamei, A.F. & Friese, E.J. (1967). Trans. AIME, 239, 1676–1685.Google Scholar
Gu, M., Notis, M.R. & Marder, A.R. (1989). Proceedings of the International Conference of Zinc and Zinc Alloy Coated Steel Sheet, September 5-7, 1989, Keidanren Kaikan, Tokyo, Japan, 462–477.Google Scholar
Gu, M., Simmons, G.W., & Marder, A.R. (1990). Met. Trans. 21A, February, 273–277.Google Scholar
Gullberg, R. & Lagneborg, R. (1966). Trans. AIME, 236, 1482–1485.Google Scholar
Harris, G.B. (1952). Phil. Mag. 43, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klug, H.P. & Alexander, L.E. (1974). X-Ray Diffraction Procedures for Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials. John Wiley & Sons, 531.Google Scholar
Mueller, M.H., Chernock, W.P. & Beck, P.A. (1958). Trans. AIME, 212, 39–40.Google Scholar
Niskanen, E. (1964). Amer. Mineral. 49, 705–714.Google Scholar