Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T13:09:24.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Complementarity of experimental and numerical methods for determining residual stress states

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2012

George Roy
George Roy
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada, CANMET/MTL, 568 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G1, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Residual stress states in engineering structures are usually determined by measuring components of stress tensors with depth below the material surface. There are destructive and nondestructive methods to measure strain tensor components and convert them into stress tensor components by a variety of techniques derived from constitutive (material) equations. In this study, four methods for determining the strain tensor components are presented: X-ray diffraction method (XRDM), magnetic Barkhausen noise method (MBNM), hole drilling method (HDM), and cut-and-section method (CSM); the first two are nondestructive, and the third and fourth are semidestructive and destructive, respectively. A complementarity of the experimental and two numerical methods such as boundary element method and finite element method is explained. An application of the experimental and numerical methods to measure residual stress states in an industrial component, an L-shaped part of a supporting column in a high voltage structure, is presented.

Keywords

ResidualstressX-rayholedrillingcutsectionmagneticapplication
Type
Methods For Residual Stress Analysis
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 24 , Supplement S1 , June 2009 , pp. S3 - S10
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brebbia, C. A., Telles, J. C. F., and Wrobel, L. C. (1984). Boundary Element Techniques, Theory and Applications in Engineering (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eadie, R., Hunt, L. W., Sutherby, R. L., Roy, G., Shen, G., Luo, J., Chen, W., Hamré, T. C., King, F., and Jack, T. (2002). “Long seam welds in gas and liquids pipelines and near-neutral pH stress corrosion cracking and corrosion fatigue,” Proceedings of IPC 2002: International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, paper 27118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eadie, R., Shen, G., and Been, J. (2003). “Elastic-plastic analysis for near-neutral pH SCC cracking at the DSAW longseam weld and at corrosion pits in line pipe,” Nova Chemicals Report.Google Scholar
Edelen, D. G. B., Green, A. E., and Laws, N. (1971). “Nonlocal continuum mechanics,” Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.AVRMAW 43, 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, T. and Roy, G. (1996). Handbook of Measurement of Residual Stresses, edited by Lu, J. (Fairmont, Lilburn, GA), Chap. 6, pp. 133–148.Google Scholar
Jiles, D. (1991). Introduction to Magnetism and Magnetic Materials (Chapman and Hall, New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsunsky, A. M. (2004). “Variational determination of eigenstrain sources of residual stress,” International Conference on Computational and Experimental Engineering and Science, 2004.Google Scholar
Korsunsky, A. M., Regino, G. M., and Nowell, D. (2007). “Variational eigenstrain analysis of residual stresses in a welded plate,” Int. J. Solids Struct.IJSOAD 44, 4574–4591.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.11.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mase, G. E. (1970). Schaum’s Outline of Theory and Problems of Continuum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York), p. 128.Google Scholar
Noyan, I. C. and Cohen, J. B. (1987). Residual Stress-Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation (Springer-Verlag, New York).Google Scholar
Roy, G. (1986). “Residual stress determination by the hole drilling method: Theory and applications,” Report No. PMRL 86-32(OP,J), CANMET, Physical Metallurgy.Google Scholar
Roy, G.(1996). “Accuracy and validation of the method,” Handbook of Measurement of Residual Stresses, edited by Lu, J. (Fairmont, Lilburn, GA), Chap. 2, pp. 20–26.Google Scholar
Roy, G., Braid, M., and Shen, G. (2003). “Application of ADINA and hole drilling method to residual stress determination in weldments,” Comput. Struct.CMSTCJ 81, 929–935.10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00478-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, G., Cousineau, E., Kiff, D., Gauthier, J., and Kular, A. C. (1993). “Residual stress determination in cold-formed sections for transmission towers in Canada,” MTL Report No. 93-44 (CF).Google Scholar
Schajer, G. S. (1988a). “Measurement of non-uniform residual stresses using the hole-drilling method. Part I. Stress calculation procedures,” ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol.JEMTA8 110, 338–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schajer, G. S. (1988b). “Measurement of non-uniform residual stresses using the hole-drilling method. Part II. Practical application of the integral method,” ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol.JEMTA8 110, 344–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schajer, G. S. (2007). “Hole-drilling residual stress profiling with automated smoothing,” ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol.JEMTA8 129, 440–445.10.1115/1.2744416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiitto, S. (1996). Handbook of Measurement of Residual Stresses, edited by Lu, J. (Fairmont, Lilburn, GA), Chap. 8, pp. 179–224.Google Scholar
Truesdell, C. (2004). The Non-linear Field Theories of Mechanics, 3rd ed. (Springer-Verlag, New York), p. 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueda, Y. (1996). “Sectioning method,” in Handbook of Measurement of Residual Stresses, edited by Lu, J. (Fairmont, Lilburn, GA), Chap. 4, pp. 49–70.Google Scholar
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (2009). <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moment_(physics)>..>Google Scholar