Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:35:47.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Production perspectives of heavy metal record producers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2019

Niall Thomas
Affiliation:
University of Winchester, Sparkford Road, Winchester SO22 4NR, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Andrew King
Affiliation:
University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU5 7RX, UK E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The study of the recorded artefact from a musicological perspective continues to unfold through contemporary research. Whilst an understanding of the scientific elements of recorded sound is well documented, the exploration of the production and the artistic nature of this endeavour is still developing. This article explores phenomenological aspects of producing heavy metal music from the perspective of seven renowned producers working within the genre. Through a series of interviews and subsequent in-depth analysis, particular sonic qualities are identified as key within the production of this work: impact; energy; precision; and extremity. A conceptual framework is then put forward for understanding the production methodology of recorded heavy metal music, and how developing technology has influenced the production of the genre.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Arnett, J. 1996. Metal Heads: Heavy Metal Music and Adolescent Alienation. Colorado, Westview PressGoogle Scholar
Be Berger, H.M., and Fales, C. 2005. ‘Heaviness in the perception of Heavy Metal guitar timbres. The match of perceptual and acoustic features over time’, in Wired for Sound, Engineering and Technology in Sonic Cultures, ed. Greene, P. and Porcello, T. (Middletown, CT, Wesleyan University Press), pp. 181–97Google Scholar
Dockwray, R., and Moore, A. 2010. ‘Configuring the sound-box 1965–1972’, Popular Music, 29/2, pp. 181–97Google Scholar
Friesen, B., and Epstein, J. 1994. ‘Rock and roll ain't noise pollution: artistic conventions and tensions in the major subgenres of Heavy Metal music’, Popular Music and Society, 18/3, pp. 117Google Scholar
Frith, S. 1998. Performing Rites: On The Value of Popular Music (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Hennion, A. 1989. ‘An intermediary between production and consumption: the producer of popular music’, Science, Technology & Human Values, 14/4, pp. 400–24Google Scholar
Howlett, M. 2012. ‘The record producer as nexus’, Journal on the Art of Record Production, 6, pp. 1–13Google Scholar
Izhaki, R. 2013. Mixing Audio: Concepts, Practices and Tools (Abingdon, Taylor & Francis)Google Scholar
Jones, K. 2011. ‘Collecting Heavy Metal’, Canadian Association of Music Libraries, 39/1, pp. 625.Google Scholar
Kahn-Harris, K. 2006. Extreme Metal: Music and Culture on the Edge. Oxford and New York, Berg.Google Scholar
Kennedy, L 2012. Controlling the Extreme: A Case Study of Contemporary Prog. MMus Thesis, The University of Hull.Google Scholar
Leyshon, A. 2009. ‘The software slump?: Digital music, the democratisation of technology, and the decline of the recording studio sector within the musical economy. http://www3.nd.edu/~kmatta/MGT30660/Articles/democratization%20of%20tech%20&%20decline%20of%20recording%20industry.pdfGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. 2014. ‘The role and working practise of music producers: an interpretative phenomenological analysis’, PhD Thesis, University of HullGoogle Scholar
Mynett, M. 2012. ‘Achieving intelligibilty whilst maintaining heaviness when producing contemporary Heavy Metal music’, Journal of the Art of Record Production, 6, pp. 1–10Google Scholar
Mynett, M. 2013. ‘Contemporary metal music production’, Doctoral thesis, University of HuddersfieldGoogle Scholar
Mynett, M. 2016. ‘the distortion paradox: analysing contemporary metal production’, in Global Metal Music and Culture: Current Directions in Metal Studies, ed. Brown, A., Spracklen, K., Kahn-Harris, K., and Scott, N. (New York, Routledge), pp. 86104Google Scholar
Mynett, M., and Wakefield, J. 2009. ‘The use of click tracks for drum production within the Extreme Metal genre’, in The Art of Record Production 9, 13–15 November 2009, Cardiff, pp. 119Google Scholar
Mynett, M., Wakefield, J., and Till, R. 2010. ‘Intelligent equalisation principles and techniques for minimising masking when mixing the extreme modern metal genre’, in Heavy Fundamentalisms: Music, Metal and Politics (Oxford, Inter-Disciplinary Press), pp. 141–6Google Scholar
Mynett, M., Wakefield, J., and Till, R. 2011. ‘Sound at source: The creative practice of re-heading, dampening and drum tuning for the Contemporary Metal genre’, in ARP 2010 Proceedings, pp. 1–14Google Scholar
Muikku, J. 1990. ‘On the role and tasks of a record producer’, Popular Music and Society, 14/1, pp. 2533Google Scholar
Taylor, T 2010. Strange Sounds. Music, Technology and Culture. New York and London, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Reyes, I. 2008. ‘Sound, technology, and the interpretation in subcultures of heavy music production’, dissertation, Pittsburgh UniversityGoogle Scholar
Shuker, R. 2005. Popular Music Culture: The Key Concepts (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Sinclair, G. 2011. ‘Chastising and romanticising heavy metal subculture: challenging the dichotomy with figurational sociology’, Conference Proceedings, Business of Live Music, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
Smith, J., Flowers, P., and Larkin, M. 2009. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research (London, Sage)Google Scholar
Spracklen, K., Brown, A., and Kahn-Harris, K. 2011. ‘Metal studies? Cultural research in the Heavy Metal scene’, Journal for Cultural Research, 15/3, pp. 209–12Google Scholar
Turner, D. 2009. ‘Outlining the fundamental production aesthetics of commercial heavy Metal Music utilising systematic empirical analysis’, in Art of Record Production Conference, Cardiff, p. 6Google Scholar
Walser, R. 1993. Running with the Devil: Power, Gender and Madness in Heavy Metal Music (Middletown, CT, Wesleyan University Press)Google Scholar
Weinstein, D. 1991. Heavy Metal: a Cultural Sociology (New York, New Lexington Press)Google Scholar
Weinstein, D. 2000. Heavy Metal: The Music and its Culture (New York, Da Capo Press)Google Scholar
Williams, D. 2015. ‘Tracking timbral changes in metal production from 1990 to 2013’, Metal Music Studies, 1/1, 3968Google Scholar
Zagorski-Thomas, S. 2010a. ‘Real and unreal performances: the interaction of recording technology and rock drum kit performance’, in Musical Rhythm in the Age of Digital Reproduction, ed. Danielsen, A. (Farnham, Ashgate), pp. 195212Google Scholar
Zagorski-Thomas, S. 2010b. ‘The stadium in your bedroom: functional staging, authenticity and the audience-led aesthetic in record production’, Popular Music, 29/2, pp. 251–66Google Scholar
Zak, A. 2001. Poetics of Rock: Cutting Tracks, Making Records (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press)Google Scholar

Discography

Agoraphobic Nosebleed, Agorapocalypse. Relapse, RR 7037. 2009Google Scholar
Between the Buried And Me, Colors. Victory, VR351. 2007Google Scholar
Black Sabbath, Black Sabbath. Vertigo/Warner Bros, VO 6. 1970Google Scholar
Black Sabbath, Paranoid. Vertigo/Warner Bros, 6360 011. 1971Google Scholar
Devin Townsend, Ziltoid The Omniscient. Hevy Devy Records, HDRZI13. 2007Google Scholar
Judas Priest, British Steel. Columbia, JC 36443. 1980Google Scholar
Judas Priest, Firepower. UK: Columbia. CD. B078SKX6ZV. 2018Google Scholar
Led Zeppelin, Led Zeppelin III. Atlantic, B00IXHBZF6. 1970Google Scholar
Meshuggah, Catch Thirty-Three. Nuclear Blast, NB 1311-2. 2005Google Scholar
Meshuggah, Koloss. Nuclear Blast, NB 2388-2. 2012Google Scholar
The Beatles, The White Album. Apple, B0025KVLU6, 1968Google Scholar