Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:01:51.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perspectives in popular musicology: music, Lennox, and meaning in 1990s pop1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Stan Hawkins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Scholars of popular music in the 1990s are increasingly aware that traditional musicology has failed to recognise commercial pop music as a legitimate academic area of study. Intransigence on the part of many Western music institutions towards recognising the field of popular music study is attributable to issues that have been heatedly debated and discussed in most disciplines of popular music study. Even withstanding the expansion of critical approaches in the 1970s, which paved the way forward to the emergence of new musicological discourses by the late 1980s, musicologists engaged in popular music research have continued to feel some sense of isolation from the mainstream for obvious reasons. The implications of consumerism, commercialism, trend and hype, with the vigorous endorsement of modernist ideologies, have repeatedly curtailed any serious opportunity for studying popular music in Western music institutions. To start accommodating this area of music within any musicological discourse, scholars active within the field of popular music have had to branch out into new interdisciplinary directions to locate and interpret the ideological strands of meaning that bind pop music to its political, cultural and social context. Musical codes and idiolects are in the first instance culturally derived, with communication processes constructing the cultural norms that determine our cognition and emotional responses to musical sound (Ruud 1986). Any proposal of popular music analysis therefore needs to seek the junctures at which a range of texts interlock with musicology. Similarly, the point at which consumer demand and musical authenticity fuse requires careful consideration; it is the commodification of pop music that continues to problematise the process of its aesthetic evaluation within our Western culture.

Type
Articles
Information
Popular Music , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 17 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baudrillard, J. 1983. Simulations (New York)Google Scholar
Berland, J. 1993. ‘Sound, image and social space: music video and media reconstruction’, in Sound and Vision: The Music Reader, eds Frith, S., Goodwin, A. and Grossberg, L. (Routledge)Google Scholar
Best, S. and Kellner, D. 1991. Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations (Macmillan)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, P. 1994. ‘Are you musical? Musicology today II’, The Musical Times, vol. cxxxv, pp. 370–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. 1993. ‘Imitation and gender insubordination’, in The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader, eds Abelove, H., Barale, M.A. and Halperin, D.M. (Routledge) pp. 307–20Google Scholar
Case, S.-E. 1993. ‘Toward a butch-femme aesthetic’, in The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader, eds Abelove, H., Barale, M.A. and Halperin, D.M. (Routledge) pp. 294–306Google Scholar
Citron, M. 1993. Gender and the Musical Canon (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Cook, N. 1994. ‘Music and meaning in the commercials’, Popular Music, 13/1, pp. 27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, S. and Horne, H. 1987. Art into Pop (London)Google Scholar
Gaar, G.G. 1993. She's A Rebel: The History of Women in Rock & Roll (London)Google Scholar
Goodwin, A. 1993. Dancing in the Distraction Factory: Music Television and Popular Culture (Routledge)Google Scholar
Hawkins, S. 1992. ‘Prince: harmonic analysis of “Anna Stesia”’, Popular Music, 11/3, pp. 325–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, E.A. 1987. Rocking Around the Clock: Music Television, Postmodernism, and Consumer Culture (New York)Google Scholar
Koskoff, E. (ed.) 1987. Women and Music in Cross-Cultural Perspective (Greenwood, Connecticut)Google Scholar
McClary, S. 1991. Feminine Endings: Music, Gender, and Sexuality (Minnesota)Google Scholar
Middleton, R. 1990. Studying Popular Music (Milton Keynes)Google Scholar
Middleton, R. 1993. ‘Popular music analysis and musicology: bridging the gap’, Popular Music, 12/2, pp. 177–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M. 1992. ‘A balance against the death wish’, THE, 28 08Google Scholar
Ruud, E. 1986. ‘Music as communication’, in Music and Health, ed Ruud, (Oslo)Google Scholar
Shepherd, J. 1987. ‘Music and male hegemony’, in Music and Society, eds Leppert, R. and McClary, S. (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Subotnik, R.R. 1991. Developing Variations (Minnesota)Google Scholar
Tagg, P. 1982. ‘Analysing popular music: theory, method, and practice’, Popular Music, 2, pp. 37–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walser, R. 1993. Running With The Devil: Power, Gender, and Madness in Heavy Metal Music (Wesleyan University)Google Scholar
Williamson, J. 1993. ‘Meaning and ideology’, in Studying Culture, eds Gray, A. and McGuigan, J. (Edward Arnold)Google Scholar
Wolff, J. 1990. Feminine Sentences: Essays on Women and Culture (Berkely)Google Scholar