Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T21:13:56.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Live mediation: performing concerts using studio technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2016

Yngvar Kjus
Affiliation:
University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway E-mail: [email protected]
Anne Danielsen
Affiliation:
University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The use of computers is continuously changing the sound of records but also increasingly challenging established forms of live concert aesthetics. So what becomes of creativity and expressivity in the live performance? In this study, we present an artist-oriented approach to this question through interviews with artists invested in performing studio works on stage, as well as improvising musicians using studio technology in their concerts. We find that challenges to creative authorship and expressive agency are constantly negotiated through evolving practices of up- and down-scaling particular aspects of studio works on stage, as well as designing technological setups tailored to individual forms of improvisation. While these practices challenge deep-rooted notions of the ‘right’ or appropriate bond between musician and music, the appropriation of studio technology in live performance has clearly become an integral part of many artists’ continual exploration of their musical agency.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andean, J. 2011. ‘Ecological psychology and the electroacoustic concert context’, Organized Sound, 16/2, pp. 125–33.Google Scholar
Auslander, P. 2008 [1999]. Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture, 2nd edn (New York, Routledge)Google Scholar
Auslander, P. 2012. ‘Digital liveness: a historico-philosophical perspective’, A Journal of Performance and Art, 34/3, pp. 311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auslander, P. 2013. ‘Sound and vision: the audio/visual economy of musical performance’, in The Oxford Handbook of New Audiovisual Aesthetics, ed. Richardson, J., Gorbman, C. and Vernallis, C. (Oxford, Oxford University Press), pp. 605–21Google Scholar
Baily, J. 1991. ‘Some cognitive aspects of motor planning in musical performance’, Psychologica Belgica, 31, pp. 147–62Google Scholar
Benjamin, W. 2008 [1936]. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction (London, Penguin)Google Scholar
Brøvig-Hanssen, R. 2013. ‘Music in bits and bits of music: signatures of digital mediation in popular music recordings’, PhD thesis (University of Oslo)Google Scholar
Clarke, E.F. 2005. ‘Creativity in performance’, Musicae Scientae, 19/1, pp. 157–82Google Scholar
Dean, R.T. 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Computer Music (Oxford, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Eisenberg, E. 2005 [1987]. The Recording Angel: Music, Records and Culture from Aristotle to Zappa (New Haven, CT, Yale University Press)Google Scholar
Emmerson, S. 2007. Living Electronic Music (Farnham, Ashgate)Google Scholar
Frith, S. 1986. ‘Art versus technology: the strange case of popular music’, Media, Culture and Society, 8, pp. 263–79Google Scholar
Frith, S., and Zagorski-Thomas, S. 2012. The Art of Record Production: An Introductory Reader for a New Academic Field (Farnham, Ashgate)Google Scholar
Gracyk, T. 1996. Rhythm and Noise: An Aesthetics of Rock (Durham, NC, Duke University Press)Google Scholar
Grossberg, L. 1993. ‘The media economy of rock culture: cinema, postmodernity and authenticity’, in Sound and Vision: The Music Video Reader, ed. Frith, S., Goodwin, A. and Grossberg, L. (London, Routledge), pp. 185209 Google Scholar
Hesmondhalgh, D., and Baker, S. 2011. Creative Labour: Media Work in Three Cultural Industries (New York, Routledge)Google Scholar
Holmes, T. 2012. Electronic and Experimental Music. Technology, Music, and Culture, 4th edn (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Jensenius, A.R. 2013. ‘An action–sound approach to teaching interactive music’, Organized Sound, 18/2, pp. 178–89Google Scholar
Knowles, J., and Hewitt, D. 2012. ‘Performance recordivity: studio music in a live context’, Journal on the Art of Record Production, 6 www.arpjournal.com Google Scholar
Lunt, P., and Livingstone, S. 1996. ‘Rethinking the focus group in media and communications research’, Journal of Communication 46/2, pp. 7998 Google Scholar
Montano, E. 2010. ‘How do you know he's not playing Pac-Man while he's supposed to be DJing?’: technology, formats and the digital future of DJ culture’, Popular Music, 29/3, pp. 397416 Google Scholar
Peters, J.D. 2001. ‘Witnessing’, Media, Culture and Society, 23/6, pp. 707–23Google Scholar
Randel, D.M. 2003. ‘Electronic music’, The Harvard Dictionary of Music (Cambridge, Belknap Press)Google Scholar
Richardson, J. 2011. An Eye for Music: Popular Music and the Audiovisual Surreal (Oxford, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Scannell, P. 1996. Radio, Television and Modern Life: A Phenomenological Approach (Oxford, Blackwell)Google Scholar
Schaeffer, P. 2006. ‘Acousmatics’, in Audio Culture. Readings in Modern Music, ed. Cox, C. and Warner, D. (London, Continuum), pp. 7681 Google Scholar
Théberge, P. 1997. Any Sound You Can Imagine: Making Music/Consuming Technology (Middletown, CT, Wesleyan University Press)Google Scholar
Toynbee, J. 2000. Making Popular Music: Musicians, Creativity and Institutions (London, Arnold)Google Scholar
Trask, S. 1996. ‘Jazz angles’, in History of House, ed. Kempster, C. (London, Sanctuary)Google Scholar
Turino, T. 2008. Music as Social Life: The Politics of Participation (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
Williams, R. 1975[1961]. The Long Revolution (Harmondsworth, Penguin)Google Scholar
Ytreberg, E. 2006. ‘Premediations of performance in recent live television: a scripting approach to media production studies’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9/4, pp. 421–40Google Scholar
Zak, A. 2001. The Poetics of Rock: Cutting Tracks, Making Records (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press)Google Scholar