Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:24:51.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A corpus analysis of rock harmony

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2011

Trevor de Clercq  and
David Temperley
Trevor de Clercq
Affiliation:
Eastman School of Music, Department of Music Theory, 26 Gibbs Street, Rochester, NY 14604, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
David Temperley
Affiliation:
Eastman School of Music, Department of Music Theory, 26 Gibbs Street, Rochester, NY 14604, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, we report a corpus analysis of rock harmony. As a corpus, we used Rolling Stone magazine's list of the ‘500 Greatest Songs of All Time’; we took the 20 top-ranked songs from each decade (the 1950s through the 1990s), creating a set of 100 songs. Both authors analysed all 100 songs by hand, using conventional Roman numeral symbols. Agreement between the two sets of analyses was over 90 per cent. The analyses were encoded using a recursive notation, similar to a context-free grammar, allowing repeating sections to be encoded succinctly. The aggregate data was then subjected to a variety of statistical analyses. We examined the frequency of different chords and chord transitions. The results showed that IV is the most common chord after I and is especially common preceding the tonic. Other results concern the frequency of different root motions, patterns of co-occurrence between chords, and changes in harmonic practice across time.

Type
Articles
Information
Popular Music , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 47 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allmusic. 2010. http://allmusic.com (accessed 9 April 2010)Google Scholar
Brown, M. 1997. ‘“Little Wing”: a study in musical cognition’, in Understanding Rock: Essays in Musical Analysis, ed. Covach, J. and Boone, G. (Oxford, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Budge, H. 1943. ‘A study of chord frequencies based on the music of representative composers of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries’, PhD thesis (New York, Columbia University)Google Scholar
Burns, L. 2008. ‘Analytic methodologies for rock music: harmonic and voice-leading strategies in Tori Amos's “Crucify”’, in Expression in Pop-Rock Music: Critical and Analytical Essays, 2nd edn, ed. Everett, W. (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Covach, J., and Boone, G. (eds.) 1997. Understanding Rock: Essays in Musical Analysis (Oxford, Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, W. 2004. ‘Making sense of rock's tonal systems’, Music Theory Online, 10Google Scholar
Everett, W. (ed.) 2008a. Expression in Pop-Rock Music: Critical and Analytical Essays, 2nd edn (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Everett, W. 2008b. ‘Pitch down the middle’, in Expression in Pop-Rock Music: Critical and Analytical Essays, 2nd edn, ed. Everett, W. (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Franzon, H. 2010. Acclaimed Music: The Most Recommended Albums and Songs of All Time. http://acclaimedmusic.net (accessed 9 April 2010)Google Scholar
Holm-Hudson, K. (ed.) 2002. Progressive Rock Reconsidered (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Huron, D. 2006. Sweet Anticipation: Music and the Psychology of Expectation (Cambridge, MIT Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkin, C. et al. (eds.) 2003. The Billboard Illustrated Encyclopedia of Rock, rev. edn (New York, Billboard Books)Google Scholar
Middleton, R. 1990. Studying Popular Music (Buckingham, Open University Press)Google Scholar
Miller, J. (ed.) 1980. The Rolling Stone Illustrated History of Rock & Roll, rev. edn (New York, Random House)Google Scholar
Moore, A. 1992. ‘Patterns of harmony’, Popular Music, 11, pp. 73–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, A. 1995. ‘The so-called “flattened seventh” in rock’, Popular Music, 14, pp. 185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, A. 2001. Rock: The Primary Text: Developing a Musicology of Rock, 2nd edn (Aldershot, Ashgate Publishing)Google Scholar
Recording Industry Association of America. 2008. ‘2008 consumer profile’. www.RIAA.com, http://76.74.24.142/8EF388DA-8FD3-7A4E-C208-CDF1ADE8B179.pdf (accessed 9 April 2010)Google Scholar
Rolling Stone. 2004. ‘The 500 greatest songs of all time’. Rolling Stone, 963 (9 December), pp. 65–165Google Scholar
Schoenberg, A. 1969. Structural Functions of Harmony, rev. edn (New York, W.W. Norton)Google Scholar
Stephenson, K. 2002. What to Listen for in Rock: A Stylistic Analysis (New Haven, Yale University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagg, P. 1982. ‘Analysing popular music: theory, method and practice’, Popular Music, 2, pp. 37–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temperley, D. 2001. The Cognition of Basic Musical Structures (Cambridge, MIT Press)Google Scholar
Temperley, D. 2007a. ‘The melodic–harmonic “divorce” in rock’, Popular Music, 26, pp. 323–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temperley, D. 2007b. Music and Probability (Cambridge, MIT Press)Google Scholar
Temperley, D. 2009. ‘A statistical analysis of tonal harmony’. http://www.theory.esm.rochester.edu/temperley/kp-stats/ (accessed 9 April 2010)Google Scholar
VH1. 1999. VH1's 100 Greatest Songs of Rock and Roll. Film. Dylan McDermott, hostGoogle Scholar
Williams, P. 1993. Rock and Roll: the 100 Best Singles (New York, Carroll & Graf Publishers)Google Scholar