Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:18:20.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The promotional state ‘after neo-liberalism’: ideologies of governance and New Zealand's pop renaissance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2012

Michael Scott
Affiliation:
School of Environment, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia E-mail: [email protected]
David Craig
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Auckland, PO Box 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This article responds to Frith and Cloonan's (2008) call for researchers considering the relationship between the state and popular music to analyse more closely the ideologies of governance that undergird music policy. Building on Cloonan's ‘promotional state’ and drawing on recent New Zealand experience, this paper shows how New Zealand's Labour government (1999–2008) developed policies to support the export of ‘Kiwi’ pop which requires a reconsideration of state music policy as interventions in the market. The work of the New Zealand Music Commission in generating and coordinating working partnerships with diverse music industry actors illustrates emerging forms of ‘after neo-liberal’ ideology and governance, wherein state-related actors and musicians each and together adapt to market arrangements through supply side, social inclusion and new institutional policy settings and modalities. This article offers points of comparison to types of ideological and governing/institutional formations we can expect to see emerging in promotional states elsewhere.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amin, A., and Thrift, N. 2002. Cities: Reimagining the Urban (Cambridge, Polity Press)Google Scholar
Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. 2005. ‘Neoliberalism and the Third Way’, in Neo-liberalism: A critical reader, eds Saad-filho, A. and Johnston, D. (London, Pluto Press), pp. 177184Google Scholar
Baker, S., Bennett, A., and Homan, S. 2009. ‘Cultural precincts, creative spaces: giving the local a musical spin?’, Space and Culture, 12/2, pp. 148–65Google Scholar
Barry, M. (ed.) 2005. Youth Policy and Social Inclusion: Critical Debates with Young People (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Beland, D. 2007. ‘The social exclusion discourse: ideas and policy change’, Policy and Politics, 35, pp. 123–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, T. (ed.) 1993. Rock and Popular Music: Politics, Policies, Institutions (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Berland, J. 1991. ‘Free trade and Canadian Music: level playing field or scorched earth?’, Cultural Studies, 5/3, pp. 317–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevir, M. 2005. New Labour: a critique (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Bill, A. 2005. ‘“Blood, sweat and tears”: disciplining the creative in Aotearoa New Zealand’, in 3rd International Conference on Cultural Policy Research (ICCPR), 25–28 August (Montreal, HEC). http://66.102.1.104/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=cache:tnN4M_1VQ0sJ:www.hec.ca/iccpr/PDF_Texts/Bill_Amanda.pdf+amanda+bill [Accessed 12 July 2006]Google Scholar
Boston, J., Martin, J., Pallot, J., and Walsh, P. 1996. Public Management: The New Zealand Model (Auckland, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (London, Routledge and Keegan Paul)Google Scholar
Breen, M. 1999. Rock Dogs: Politics and the Australian Music Industry (Sydney, Pluto Press)Google Scholar
Breen, M. 2008. ‘Popular music policy making and the instrumental policy behaviour process’, Popular Music, 27/2, pp. 193208Google Scholar
Brenner, N., and Theodore, N. 2002. ‘Cities and geographies of “actually existing neo-liberalism”’, Antipode, 34/3, pp. 349–79Google Scholar
Burt, R. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competitio (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Caves, R. 2000. Creative Industries: Contracts between arts and commerce (Cambridge, Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Campbell, J. 2004. Institutional Change and Globalisation (Princeton, Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Clark, H. 2000. Arts, Culture and Public Policy: PM's Speech to Winter Lecture Series. http://www.beehive.govt.nz/node/8266 [Accessed 28 April 2008]Google Scholar
Clark, H. 2002. Implementing a Progressive Agenda After Fifteen Years of Neoliberalism: The New Zealand Experience: Address to London School of Economics, February 21, lecture transcript. http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/LSEPublicLecturesAndEvents/events/2002/20020221t1512z001.htm [Accessed 10 June 2006]Google Scholar
Clark, H. 2007. Social Democracy under the Southern Cross: New Zealand in the 21st Century, lecture transcript. http://www.beehive.govt.nz/speech/social+democracy+under+southern+cross+new+zealand+21st+century [Accessed 12 April 2008]Google Scholar
Cloonan, M. 1999. ‘Pop and the nation-State: towards a theorisation’, Popular Music, 18/2, pp. 193207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloonan, M. 2007. Popular Music and the State in the UK: Culture, Trade or Industry? (Aldershot, Ashgate)Google Scholar
Coase, R. 1937. ‘The nature of the firm’, Economica, 4/16, pp. 386405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coburn, D. 2000. ‘Income inequality, social cohesion, and the health status of populations: the role of neo-liberalism’, Social Science and Medicine, 51, pp. 135–46Google Scholar
Craig, D., and Cotterell, G. 2007. ‘Periodising neoliberalism?’, Policy and Politics, 35/3, pp. 497514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Arcy, D., and Brindley, P. 2002. Make or Break: Supporting UK Music in the USA (London, British Council)Google Scholar
DCMS.1998. Creative Industries Mapping Document, (Department of Culture, Media and Sport). (London, DCMS)Google Scholar
DCMS. 2001. Creative Industries Mapping Document, (Department of Culture, Media and Sport). (London, DCMS)Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P., and Powell, W. 1983. ‘The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’, American Sociological Review, 48/2, pp. 147–60Google Scholar
Economist. 2007. ‘A change of tune’, The Economist, 384/8536, p. 64Google Scholar
Eling, K. 1999. The Politics of Cultural Policy in France (London, Palgrave MacMillan)Google Scholar
England, K., and Ward, K. 2007. ‘Reading neo-liberalization’, in Neo-liberalization: States, Networks, Peoples, ed. England, K. and Ward, K. (Malden, MA, Blackwell, pp. 122Google Scholar
Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How it's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life (New York, Basic Books)Google Scholar
Frith, S. 1983. Sound Effects: Youth, Leisure and the Politics of Rock (London, Constable)Google Scholar
Frith, S., and Cloonan, M. 2008. ‘Introduction: special issue on popular music policy’, Popular Music, 27/2, pp. 189–91Google Scholar
Fusfeld, D. 1990. The Age of the Economist (London, Scott Foresman/Little, Brown Higher Education)Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 2000. The Third Way and Its Critics (Oxford, Polity Press)Google Scholar
Golding, P., and Murdock, G. (eds.) 2010. Unpacking Digital Dynamics: Engagements and Disconnections (New York, Hampton Press)Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1973. ‘The strength of weak ties’, American Journal of Sociology, 78/6, pp. 1360–80Google Scholar
Gray, J. 1986. Liberalism (Milton Keynes, Open University Press)Google Scholar
Gray, J. 1998. False Dawn: The Illusions of Global Capital (London, Granta Publications)Google Scholar
Hailstones, Y. (ed.) 1982. Viewpoints on Supply-side Economics (Reston, VA, Reston Publishing)Google Scholar
Harvey, D. 2005. A Brief History of Neo-Liberalism (Oxford, Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, C. 2004. ‘The normalising role of rationalist assumptions in the institutional embedding of neoliberalism’, Economy and Society, 33/4, pp. 500–27Google Scholar
Hesmondhalgh, D., and Pratt, A.C. 2005. ‘Cultural industries and cultural policy’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11, pp. 113Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. 1975. Age of Capital (New York, Charles Scribner's Sons)Google Scholar
Hodgson, P. 2004. New Zealand's Creative Economy: Keynote Address to Asia Society Seminar and Ministerial Luncheon on New Zealand's Creative Economy, February 24 (New York). http://www.beehive.govt.nz/node/19014 [Accessed 28 August 2007]Google Scholar
Homan, S. 2003. The Mayor's a Square: Live Music and Law and Order in Sydney (Newtown, Local Consumption Publications)Google Scholar
International Federation of Phonographic Industries. 2008. CD Sales Per Capita: Top Markets in 2006. http://www.ifpi.org/content/library/cd-sales-per-capita.pdf [Accessed 25 April 2008]Google Scholar
Jayasuriya, K. 2006. Statecraft, Welfare and the Politics of Inclusion (Houndsmills, Palgrave)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessop, B. 1998. ‘The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development’, International Social Science Journal, 50/155, pp. 2945Google Scholar
Jessop, B. 2002a. The Future of the Capitalist State (Oxford, Polity Press)Google Scholar
Jessop, B. 2002b. ‘Liberalism, neo-liberalism, and urban governance. A state theoretical perspective’, Antipode, 34/3, pp. 452–72Google Scholar
Jones, M. 1999. ‘Changing slides: Labour's music industry policy under the microscope’, Critical Quarterly, 41/1, pp. 2231Google Scholar
Jones, M. 2003. ‘The music industry as workplace: an approach to analysis’, in Understanding the Cultural Industries, ed. Beck, A. (London, Routledge), pp. 147–58Google Scholar
Kong, L. 2000. ‘Culture, economy, policy: trends and developments’, Geoforum, 31/4, pp. 385–90Google Scholar
Lane, J.-E., and Ersson, S. 2000. The New Institutional Politics (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Larner, W. 2000. ‘Neo-liberalism: policy, ideology, governmentality’, Studies in Political Economy, 63, pp. 525Google Scholar
Larner, W. 2005. ‘Neo-liberalism in (regional) theory and practice: the stronger communities action fund’, Geographical Research, 43/1, pp. 918Google Scholar
Larner, W., and Craig, D. 2005. ‘After neoliberalism? Community activism and local partnerships in Aotearoa New Zealand’, Antipode, 37/3, pp. 402–24Google Scholar
Levitas, R. 1998. The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour (London, Macmillan)Google Scholar
Lewis, N. 2003. ‘Embedding the reforms in New Zealand schooling: after neo-liberalism?’, GeoJournal, 59/2, pp. 149–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, N., Larner, W., and Le Heron, R. 2008. ‘The New Zealand designer fashion industry: making industries and co-constituting political projects’, Transactions of Institute of British Geographers, 33/1, pp. 4259Google Scholar
Looseley, D. 2003. Popular Music in Contemporary France (Oxford, Berg)Google Scholar
Maharey, S. 2003. Social Capital and Social Development – Enabling New Zealanders. Address to the Annual General Meeting of Philanthropy New Zealand (Wellington). http://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/social+capital+and+social+development+-+enabling+new+zealanders [Accessed 12 April 2008]Google Scholar
Makela, J. 2008. ‘The state of rock: a history of Finland's cultural policy and music export’, Popular Music, 27/2, pp. 257–69Google Scholar
McLeay, C. 2006. ‘Government regulation in the Australian popular music industry: the rhetoric of cultural protection, the reality of economic production’, GeoJournal, 65/1–2, pp. 91102Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. 1996. Popular Music and Local Identity (Leicester, University of Leicester Press)Google Scholar
Murdock, G. 2003. ‘Back to work: cultural labour in altered times’, in Cultural Work. Understanding the Cultural Industries, ed, Beck, A. (London, Routledge), pp. 1536Google Scholar
Neelands, J., Freakly, V., and Lindsay, G. 2006. ‘Things can only get better: a study of social market interventions in the shaping of the field of cultural production’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 12/1, pp. 93109Google Scholar
Negus, K. 2002. ‘The work of cultural intermediaries and the enduring distance between production and consumption’, Cultural Studies, 16/4, pp. 501–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Zealand Institute of Economic Research. 2002. Creative Industries in New Zealand: Economic Contribution: A Report to Industry New Zealand (Wellington, New Zealand Institute of Economic Research)Google Scholar
New Zealand Music Commission. 2007. About Us. http://nzmusic.org.nz/about/ [Accessed 14 October 2007]Google Scholar
New Zealand Music Commission. 2010a. Growing the New Zealand Music Industry Culturally and Economically. At and Abroad. http://nzmusic.org.nz/resources/music-commission/nz-music-commission-business-plan-2010/ [Accessed 2 October 2010]Google Scholar
New Zealand Music Commission. 2010b. Outward Sound Funded Artists Since Inception. http://nzmusic.org.nz/international/recipients/ [Accessed 2 October 2010]Google Scholar
New Zealand Music Commission. 2011. Industry information. http://nzmusic.org.nz/resources/music-commission/?p=2 (accessed 19 July 2011)Google Scholar
New Zealand Music Industry Development Group. 2004. Creating Heat: Tumata Kia Whita! A Strategy to Ignite the Economic and Cultural Potential of the New Zealand Music Industry. http://www.nzte.govt.nz/common/files/creating-heat.pdf [Accessed 14 March 2005]Google Scholar
New Zealand Trade Development Board. 1989. New Horizons for the Arts Business: The Foreign Exchange Earning Potential of the Arts in New Zealand (Wellington, Paragon Arts)Google Scholar
New Zealand Treasury. 2001. Towards an Inclusive Economy. http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/research-policy/wp/2001/01-15/twp01-15.pdf [Accessed 18 October 2005]Google Scholar
Newman, J. (ed.) 2005. Remaking Governance: People, Politics, and the Public Sphere (Bristol, Policy Press)Google Scholar
Nixon, S., and Du Gay, P. 2002. ‘Who needs cultural intermediaries?’, Cultural Studies, 16/4, pp. 495500Google Scholar
North, D. 1984. ‘Government and the cost of exchange in history’, Journal of Economic History, 44/2, pp. 255–64Google Scholar
Oakley, K. 2006. ‘Include us out – economic development and social policy in the creative industries’, Cultural Trends, 15/4, pp. 255–73Google Scholar
Office of the Prime Minister. 2003. Growing an Innovative New Zealand. http://www.beehive.govt.nz/innovate/innovative.pdf [Accessed 25 May 2005]Google Scholar
Outward Sound. 2006. Grants Overview. http://www.nzmusic.org.nz/outwardsound/OS Scheme Overview Aug2006.pdfGoogle Scholar
Peck, J. 2001a. Workfare States (New York, Guilford Press)Google Scholar
Peck, J. 2001b. ‘Neo-liberalising states: thin policies/hard outcomes’, Progress in Human Geography, 25/3, p. 445Google Scholar
Peck, J., and Tickell, A. 2002. ‘Neoliberalising space’, Antipode, 34/3, pp. 380404Google Scholar
Peters, B.G., and Pierre, J. 1998. ‘Governance without government’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8/2, pp. 223–43Google Scholar
Pickering, M., and Shuker, R. 1993. ‘Radio Gaga: popular music and the radio quota debate in New Zealand’, New Zealand Sociology, 8/1, pp. 2159Google Scholar
Porter, D., and Craig, D. 2004. ‘The third way and the Third World: poverty reduction and social inclusion in the “rise” of inclusive liberalism’, Review of International Political Economy, 11/2, pp. 387423Google Scholar
Power, D., and Scott, A. (eds.) 2004. Cultural Industries and the Production of Culture (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Pratt, A.C. 2005. ‘Cultural industries and public policy: an oxymoron?’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11/1, pp. 3144Google Scholar
Reid, G. 1991. ‘Music New Zealand: the fresh source’, Billboard, 103, pp. 6771Google Scholar
Rhodes, R.A.W. 1996. ‘The new governance: governing without government’, Political Studies, XLIV, pp. 652–67Google Scholar
Richardson, J. 2001. Contending Liberalisms in World Politics: Ideology and Power (Boulder, L. Reinner)Google Scholar
Rose, N., and Miller, P. 2010. ‘Political power beyond the state: problematics of government’, British Journal of Sociology, 61, pp. 271303CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutten, P. 1991. ‘Local popular music on the national and international markets’, Cultural Studies, 5/3, pp. 294305Google Scholar
Scott, A. 1999. ‘The US recorded music industry: on the relations between organisation, location, and creativity in the cultural economy’, Environment and Planning A, 31, pp. 1965–84Google Scholar
Scott, G. 2001. Public Management in New Zealand: Lessons and Challenges (Wellington, New Zealand Business Roundtable)Google Scholar
Scott, M. 2008. ‘The networked state: New Zealand on air and New Zealand's pop renaissance’, Popular Music, 27/2, pp. 299305Google Scholar
Selby, M. 2005. NZ Out There Meets Phase Five. http://www.nzmusician.co.nz/index.php/ps_pagename/article/pi_articleid/672 [Accessed 3 February 2006]Google Scholar
Shuker, R. 2005. Understanding Popular Music (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Shuker, R. 2007. ‘That was then, this is now: the New Zealand music industry 1986–2006′, Perfect Beat, 8/3, pp. 1930Google Scholar
Shuker, R. 2008. ‘New Zealand popular music, government policy, and cultural identity’, Popular Music, 27/2, pp. 271–87Google Scholar
Shuker, R., and Pickering, M. 1994. ‘Kiwi rock: popular music and cultural identity in New Zealand’, Popular Music, 13/3, pp. 261–78Google Scholar
Skilling, P. 2005. ‘Trajectories of arts and culture policy in New Zealand’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64/4, pp. 2031Google Scholar
Smith, N. 2005. ‘They're playing our songs’, New Zealand Listener, 3404. http://www.listener.co.nz/uncategorized/theyre-playing-our-songs/ [Accessed 4 March 2008]Google Scholar
Statistics New Zealand. 2006. Cultural Indicators for New Zealand. http://www.stats.govt.nz/NR/rdonlyres/65AFBAD3-DC5F-4DC2-9D90-EBEC0E7284FF/0/SNZculturalindicatorsreport_1Augustversion.pdf [Accessed 12 March 2007]Google Scholar
Strachan, R., and Leonard, M. 2004. ‘A musical nation: protection, investment and branding in the Irish music industry’, Irish Studies Review, 12/1, pp. 3949Google Scholar
Thompson, G. 2003. Between Hierarchies and Markets: The Logic and Limits of Network Forms of Organization (Oxford, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Tizard, J. 2000. Heritage, Identity and Our Shared Future. Speech marking the opening of Carter Group Heritage Week. http://www.beehive.govt.nz/speech/heritage+identity+and+our+shared+future [Accessed 19 April 2008]Google Scholar
Toynbee, J. 2003. ‘Fingers to the bone or spaced out on creativity?’, in Cultural Work: Understanding the Cultural Industries, ed. Beck, A. (London, Routledge), pp. 3955Google Scholar
Vowles, J. 2002. ‘The general election in New Zealand, November 1999′, Electoral Studies, 21/1, pp. 134–9Google Scholar
Wade, R. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialisation (Princeton, Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Wallis, R., and Malm, K. 1984. Big Sounds from Small Peoples: The Music Industry in Small Countries (London, Constable)Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1968. Economy and Society (New York, Bedminister Press)Google Scholar
Williams, R. 1988. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society (London, Fontana)Google Scholar
Williamson, O. 2000. ‘Economic institutions and development’, in A Not So Dismal Science: A Broader View of Economies and Societies, ed. Olson, M. and Kahkone, S. (Oxford, Oxford University Press), pp. 92118Google Scholar
Work and Income New Zealand. 2008. Pathways to Arts and Cultural Employment (PACE) Resource Pack (Wellington, WINZ)Google Scholar
World Bank. 1997. World Development Report: The State in a Changing World. http://www.worldbank.org/html/extpb/wdr97/english/wdr97con.htm [Accessed 14 May 2005]Google Scholar
Wright, R. 1991. ‘Gimme shelter’: observations on cultural protectionism and the recording industry in Canada’, Cultural Studies, 5/3, pp. 306–16Google Scholar
Young, D. 2004. ‘The promotional state and Canada's Juno Awards’, Popular Music, 23/3, pp. 271–89Google Scholar
Yudice, G. 2003. The Expediency of Culture: Uses of Culture in the Global Era (Durham, NC, Duke University Press)Google Scholar