Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:17:59.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who Favors Legalizing Physician-Assisted Suicide? The Vote on Michigan's Proposal B

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

John Strate ,
Timothy Kiska  and
Marvin Zalman
John Strate*
Affiliation:
Wayne State University, USA
Timothy Kiska
Affiliation:
University of Michigan—Dearborn, USA
Marvin Zalman
Affiliation:
Wayne State University, USA
*
Correspondence should be addressed to Department of Political Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access

Abstract

At the November 1998 general election, Michigan citizens were given the opportunity to vote on Proposal B, an initiative that would have legalized physician-assisted suicide (PAS). PAS initiatives also have been held in Washington State, California, Oregon, and Maine, with only Oregon's passing. We use exit poll data to analyze the vote on Proposal B. Attributes associated with social liberalism—Democratic Party identification, less frequent church attendance, more education, and greater household income—led to increased odds of a “yes” vote. Attributes associated with social conservatism—Republican Party identification and frequent church attendance—led to decreased odds of a “yes” vote. Similar to the abortion issue, PAS's supporters strongly value personal autonomy, whereas its opponents strongly value the sanctity of life. Voter alignments like those in Michigan will likely appear in other states with the initiative process if PAS reaches their ballots.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , September 2001 , pp. 155 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, A.I. (1995). “It's Abortion, Stupid: Policy Voting in the 1992 Presidential Election.” The Journal of Politics 57:176–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, G.D. (1997). “Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution.” American Journal of Political Science 41:718–37.Google Scholar
American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs (1991). Report: D (A-19), Decisions Near the End of Life 3.Google Scholar
Bolce, L. and de Maio, G. (1999). “The Anti-Christian Fundamentalist Factor in Contemporary Politics.” Public Opinion Quarterly 63:508–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J.C. and Strate, J. (1981). “Are Old People Conservative?” The Gerontologist 21:580–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childress, J.F. (1998). “Religious Viewpoints.” In Emanuel, L.L. (ed.), Regulating How We Die: The Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues Surrounding Physician-Assisted Suicide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, N. (1997). The Politics of Physician Assisted Suicide. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Cutler, S.J. and Kaufman, R.L. (1975). “Cohort Changes in Political Attitudes: Tolerance of Ideological Nonconformity.” Public Opinion Quarterly 39:69–81.Google Scholar
De Boer, C. (1977–78). “The Polls: Abortion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 41:553–64.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., and Bryson, B. (1996). “Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?” American Journal of Sociology 102:690–755.Google Scholar
Donovan, T., Bowler, S., McCuan, D., and Fernandez, K. (1998). “Contending Players and Strategies: Opposition Advantages in Initiative Campaigns.” In Bowler, S., Donovan, T., and Tolbert, C.J. (eds.), Citizens as Legislators: Direct Democracy in the United States. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Fino, S.P., Strate, J.M., and Zalman, M. (1997). “Paging Dr. Death: The Political Theater of Assisted Suicide in Michigan.” Politics and the Life Sciences 16:87–103.Google Scholar
Glick, H.R. (1992). The Right to Die: Policy Innovation and Its Consequences. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Glick, H.R. and Hutchinson, A. (2001). “Physician-Assisted Suicide: Agenda Setting and the Elements of Morality Policy.” In Mooney, C.Z. (ed.), The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy. New York: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Hoefler, J.M. (1997). Managing Death. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Karp, J.A. (1998). “The Influence of Elite Endorsements in Initiative Campaigns.” In Bowler, S., Donovan, T., and Tolbert, C.J. (eds.), Citizens as Legislators: Direct Democracy in the United States. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Kinder, D.R. (1996). Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1997). Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know that Liberals Don't. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miller, W.E. and Wattenberg, M.P. (1984). “Politics from the Pulpit: Religiosity and the 1980 Elections.” Public Opinion Quarterly 48:301–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, C. (2001). The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy. New York: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Nolan, J.L. Jr. (1996). The American Culture Wars: Current Contests and Future Prospects. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Oregon Health Division, Center for Health Statistics (and Vital Records) (2000). Oregon's Death with Dignity Act Annual Report 2000. Oregon Health Division, Center for Health Statistics and Vital Records.Google Scholar
Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Quill, T.E. (1991). “Death and Dignity: A Case of Individualized Decision Making.” New England Journal of Medicine 324 (10):691–94.Google Scholar
Quill, T.E. (1993). Death and Dignity: Making Choices and Taking Charge. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Stack, S. (1998). “The Relationships between Culture and Suicide: An Analysis of African Americans.” Transcultural Psychiatry 35 (2):253–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. (1997). The Christian Coalition: Dreams of Restoration, Demands for Recognition. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Yates, J.L. and Glick, H.R. (1997). “The Failed Patient Self Determination Act and Policy Alternatives for the Right to Die.” Journal of Aging and Social Policy 9:29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar