Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:41:07.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Sociobiology of Democracy: Is Authoritarianism in Our Genes?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Peter A. Corning
Peter A. Corning*
Affiliation:
Institute for the Study of Complex Systems, USA
Get access

Abstract

In the famous (some would say infamous) final chapter of his discipline-defining volume, Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, biologist Edward O. Wilson invited us to consider humankind as if we were zoologists from another planet. In this light, Wilson said, “the humanities and social sciences shrink to specialized branches of biology” (1975:547). One of the functions of the new discipline of sociobiology, Wilson suggested, was “to reformulate the foundations of the social sciences…” (1975:4). Wilson cautioned, however, that it “remains to be seen” whether or not the social sciences can be “truly biologized” in this fashion.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 103 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackoff, R.L. (1994). The Democratic Corporation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bennis, W. (1990). Why Leaders Can't Lead. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Boehm, C. (1997). “Impact of the Human Egalitarian Syndrome on Darwinian Selection Mechanics.” American Naturalist 150:100–121.Google Scholar
Coopersmith, S. (1967). The Antecedents of Self-Esteem. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Darwin, C.R. (1874 [1871]). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. New York: A.L. Burt.Google Scholar
De Waal, F.B.M. (1996). Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. (1988). Primate Social Systems. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Greenleaf, R. (1991 [1983]). Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Harcourt, A.H. and De Waal, F.B.M., eds. (1992). Coalitions and Alliances in Humans and Other Animals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kummer, H. (1968). Social Organization of Hamadryas Baboons: A Field Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kummer, H. (1971). Primate Societies: Group Techniques of Ecological Adaptation. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
Lopez, B. (1978). Of Wolves and Men. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Nitecki, M. and Nitecki, D. (1993). Evolutionary Ethics. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ray, M. and Rinzler, A. (1993). The New Paradigm in Business. New York: J.P. Tarcher/Perigee.Google Scholar
Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Somit, A. and Peterson, S.A. (1997). Darwinism, Dominance and Democracy: The Biological Bases of Authoritarianism. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Strum, S. (1987). Almost Human: A Journey into the World of Baboons. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
White, R.W. (1959). “Motivation Reconsidered: The Concept of Competence.” Psychological Review, 66:297–333.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. (1998). Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Wrangham, R. (1995). Chimpanzee Cultures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar