Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:41:41.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Response to Professor Caldwell: A Perspective from the Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Stephen L. Wasby
Stephen L. Wasby*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, New York 12222
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles and Commentaries
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , February 1985 , pp. 156 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cases

Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223 (1978)Google Scholar
Barefoot v. Estelle, 103 S.Ct. 3383 (1983)Google Scholar
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954)Google Scholar
Castenada v. Partida, 430 U.S. 482 (1977)Google Scholar
Hovey v. Superior Court, 28 Cal 3rd 1, 616 P.2d 1301 (1980)Google Scholar