Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:30:58.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Watering the Garden of Ethological Research in Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

James N. Schubert
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles and Commentaries
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , August 1983 , pp. 35 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramovitch, R. (1980). “Attention Structures in Hierarchically Organized Groups.” In Omark, D. R., Strayer, F. F., and Freeman, D. G. (eds.), Dominance Relations. New York: Garland STMP Press, pp. 381–396Google Scholar
Amidon, E. J., and Flanders, N. A., eds. (1967). The Role of the Teacher in the Classroom. Minneapolis, Minn.: Association for Productive Teaching.Google Scholar
Argyle, M. (1969). Social Interaction. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.Google Scholar
Bales, R. F. (1970). Personality and Interpersonal Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.Google Scholar
Bales, R. F., and Cohen, S. P. (1979). SYMLOG: A System for Multiple Level Observation of Groups. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Barber, J. D. (1966). Power in Committees: An Experimental Study in the Government Process. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Barner-Barry, C. (1977). “An Observational Study of Authority in a Preschool Peer Group.” Political Methodology 4:415–449.Google Scholar
Barner-Barry, C. (1980). “The Structure of Young Children's Authority Relationships.” In Omark, D. R., Strayer, F. F., and Freedman, D. G. (eds.), Dominance Relations: An Ethological View of Human Conflict and Social Interaction. New York: Garland, pp. 177–190Google Scholar
Barton, A. H., and Lazarsfeld, P. H. (1979). “Some Functions of Qualitative Analysis in Social Research.” In McCall, G. J. and Simmons, J. L. (eds.), Issues in Participant Observation. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bazelon, D. (1981). “Unveil Your Values.” APA Monitor, October 5-6.Google Scholar
Birdwhistle, R. L. (1968). “Communication.” In Sills, D. L. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Social Science. Vol. 3. New York: Macmillan, pp. 24–29.Google Scholar
Blank, R. H. (1982). “Biopolicy: A Restatement of Its Role in Politics and the Life Sciences.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1:38–42.Google Scholar
Blurton-Jones, N. (1972). “Nonverbal Communication in Children.” In Hinde, R. A. (ed.), Non-verbal Communication. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Borgatta, E. G., Couch, A. S., and Bales, R. F. (1954). “Some Findings Relevant to the Great Man Theory of Leadership.” American Sociological Review 19:755–758.Google Scholar
Bowers, D. G., and Hausser, D. L. (1977). “Work Group Types and Intervention Effects in Organizational Development.” Administrative Science Quarterly 22:76–94.Google Scholar
Brannigan, C., and Humphries, D. (1972). “Human Non-verbal Behavior, a Means of Communication.” In Blurton-Jones, N. G. (ed.), Ethological Studies of Child Behavior. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Camras, L. A. (1980). “Animal Threat Displays and Children's Facial Expressions.” In Omark, D., Strayer, F., and Freedman, D. (eds.), Dominance Relations: An Ethological View of Human Conflict and Social Interaction. New York: Garland STPM Press, pp. 121–136.Google Scholar
Chance, M. R. A., and Jones, E. (1983). “Reply to Glendon Schubert's Critique of Attention Structure.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 6:81–82.Google Scholar
Chance, M. R. A., and Larsen, R. R., eds. (1976). The Social Structure of Attention. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, W. R. (1978). “Ethology' Its Relevance for Observation Studies of Human Adaptation.” In Sackett, G. P. (ed.), Observing Behavior, Volume I: Theory and Application in Mental Retardation. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Chevalier-Skolnikov, S. (1973). “Facial Expression of Emotion in Nonhuman Primates.” In Ekman, P. (ed.), Darwin and Facial Expression. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Condon, W. S. (1970). “Method of Micro-analysis of Sound in Films of Behavior.” Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation 2:51–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condon, W. S. and Sander, L. N. (1974). “Neonate Movement is Synchronized with Adult Speech: Interactional Participation and Language Acquisition.” Science 183:99–101.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. (1982). Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex among Apes. London: Jonathon Cape.Google Scholar
Dies, R. R. (1979). “Group Psychotherapy: Reflections on Three Decades of Research.” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 15: 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, Daniel, Rozelle, Richard M., and Baxter, James E. (1980). Nonverbal Communication: Survey, Theory, and research. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Duncan, S. Jr. (1972). “Some Signals and Rules for Taking Speaking Turns in Conversations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23:283–292.Google Scholar
Dyer, W. G. (1977). Team Building. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Dyson, J. W., Godwin, P. H. B., and Hazlewood, L. A. (1978). “Political Discussion and Decision-Making in Experimental Small Groups.” In Golembiewski, R. T. (ed.), The Small Group in Political Science: The Last Two Decades of Development. Athens, Ga.: University of Georgia Press, pp. 251–261.Google Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1979). “Human Ethology: Concepts and Implications for the Sciences of Man.” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2:1–26.Google Scholar
Eisman, B. (1959). “Some Operational Measures of Cohesiveness and Their Interrelations.” Human Relations 12:183–189.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., and Friesen, W. V. (1969a). “Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception.” Psychiatry 32:88–106.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., and Friesen, W. V.(1969b). “The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage, and Coding.” Semiotica 1:49–98.Google Scholar
Ericson, P. M., and Rogers, L. E. (1973). “New Procedures for Analyzing Relational Communication.” Family Process 12:245–268.Google Scholar
Fenno, R. F. (1978). Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Francis, W. L. (1982). “Legislative Committee Systems, Optimal Committee Size, and the Costs of Decision-making.” Journal of Politics 44:822–837.Google Scholar
Frank, Robert S. (1977). “Monverbal and Paralinguistic Analysis of Political Behavior: The First McGovern-Humphrey California Primary Debate.” In Hermann, M. (ed.), A Psychological Examination of Political Leaders. New York: Free Press, pp. 64–80.Google Scholar
Garson, G. D. (1978). Group Theories of Politics. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Grant, E. C. (1969). “Human Facial Expression.” Man 4:525–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golembiewski, R. T. (1962). The Small Group. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Golembiewski, R. T. (1965). “Small Groups and Large Organizations.” In March, James G. (ed.), Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Golembiewski, R. T., and Blumberg, A., eds. (1970, 1973, 1977). Sensitivity Training and the Laboratory Approach. Itasca, Ill.: F. E. Peacock.Google Scholar
Golembiewski, R. T., and Miller, G. J. (1981). “Small Groups in Political Science: Perspectives on Significance and Stuckness.” In Long, Samuel L. (ed.), The Handbook of Political Behavior. New York: PLenum Press.Google Scholar
Hare, A. P. (1982). Creativity in Small Groups. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hermann, M. (1977). “Verbal Behavior of Negotiators in Periods of High and Low Stress: The 1965-66 New York City Transit Negotiations.” In Hermann, M. (ed.), A Psychological Examination of Political Leaders. New York: Free Press, pp. 356–383.Google Scholar
Hinde, R. A. (1974). Biological Bases of Social Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hines, S. M. (1982). “Biopolitics and the Evolution of Inquiry in Political Science.” Politics and the Life Sciences. 1:5–17.Google Scholar
Howard, J. W. (1978). “On the Fluidity of Judicial Choice.” In Goldman, S. and Sarat, A. (eds.), American Court Systems. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, pp. 495–505.Google Scholar
Hutt, S. J., and Hutt, C. (1970). Direct Observation and Measurement of Behavior. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1967). “Some Functions of Gaze-Direction in Social Interaction.” Acta Psychologica 26:22–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFrance, M., and Mayo, C. (1978). Moving Bodies: Nonverbal Communication in Social Relationships. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Lakin, M., ed. (1979). “What's Happened to Small Group Research?” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 15:265–373.Google Scholar
Lehner, P. N. (1979). Handbook of Ethological Methods. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Madron, W. H. (1978). “Some Costs and Benefits of Small Group Analysis in Political Science.” In Golembiewski, R. T. (ed.), The Small Group in Political Science: The Last Two Decades of Development. Athens, Ga.: University of Georgia Press, pp. 28–37.Google Scholar
Masters, R. D. (1976). “The Impact of Ethology on Political Science.” In Somit, A. (ed.), Biology and Politics: Recent Explorations. Paris: Mouton, pp. 197–233.Google Scholar
Masters, R. D. (1981). “Linking Ethology and Political Science: Photographs, Political Attention, and Presidential Elections.” In. Watts, M (ed.), Politics: Ethological and Physiological Approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 81–88.Google Scholar
Matthews, D. R., and Stimson, J. A. (1975). Yeas and Nays: Normal Decision-Making in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
McGrath, J. B. (1978). “Small Group Research.” American Behavioral Scientist 21:651–675.Google Scholar
McGrew, W. C. (1972). An Ethological Study of Children's Behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
McGuire, M. T. (1982). “Social Dominance Relationships in Male Vervet Monkeys: A Possible Model for the Study of Dominance Relationships in Human Political Systems.” International Political Science Review 3:11–32.Google Scholar
Mehrabian, A. (1972). “Nonverbal Communication.” In Cole, J. K. (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Vol. 19. Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 107–161.Google Scholar
Peterson, S. A. (1982). “Neurophysiology and Rationality in Political Thinking.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver.Google Scholar
Peterson, S. A., and Somit, Albert (1978). “Methodological Problems Associated with a More Biologically Oriented Social Science.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 1:11–25.Google Scholar
Peterson, S. A., and Somit, Albert (1981). “Primates, Coalitions, and Small Group Politics.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Studies Association, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Rajecki, D. W. (1977) “Etholgoical Elements in Social Psychology.” In Hendrick, C. (ed.), Perspectives on Social Psychology. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S. E. (1983). “‘Limerence’: A New Word and Concept.” Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 20:107–111.Google Scholar
Rummel, R. J. (1968). “The Relationship between National Attributes and Foreign Conflict Behavior.” In. Singer, J. D. (ed.), Quantitative International Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sackett, G. P. (1978). Observing Behavior, Volume I: Theory and Applications in Mental Retardation. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Savin-Williams, R. (1976). “An Ethological Study of Dominance Formation and Maintenance in a Group of Human Adolescents.” Child Development 47:972–979.Google Scholar
Savin-Williams, R. (1980). “Dominance and Submission among Adolescent Boys.” In Omark, D., Strayer, F., and Freedman, D. (eds.), Dominance Relations: An Ethological View of Human Conflict and Social Interaction. New York: Garland STPM Press, pp. 217–230.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R. (1979). “Personality Markers in Speech.” In Scherer, K. R. and Giles, H. (eds.), Social Markers in Speech. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R., and Ekman, Paul (1982). Handbook of Methods in Nonverbal Behavior Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1982a). “Political Ethology.” Micropolitics 2:51–86.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1982b). “Nonverbal Communication as Political Behavior.” In Key, M. R. (ed.), Nonverbal Communication Today: Current Research. New York: Mouton, pp. 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1983a). “The Structure of Attention: A Critical Review.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 6:65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1983b). “Reply to Chance and Jones.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 6:83–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, G. (1983c). “Evolutionary Politics.” Western Political Quarterly 36:175–193.Google Scholar
Schutz, W. C. (1955). “What Makes Groups Productive?” Human Relations 8:429–466.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B., ed. (1980). Small Groups and Personal Change. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Smith, P., and Connolly, K. (1972). “Patterns of Play and Social Interaction in Preschool Children.” In Blurton Jones, N. G. (ed.), Ethological Studies in Child Behavior. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strayer, F., and Strayer, J. (1976). “An Ethological Analysis of Social Agonism and Dominance Relations among Preschool Children.” Child Development 47:980–989.Google Scholar
Strayer, F., and Strayer, J. (1980). “Preschool Conflict and the Assessment of Social Dominance.” In Omark, D., Strayer, F., and Freedman, D. (eds.), Dominance Relations: An Ethological View of Human Conflict and Social Interaction. New York: Garland STPM Press, pp. 137–158.Google Scholar
Tennov, D. (1979). Love and Limerence: The Experience of Being in Love. New York: Stein and Day.Google Scholar
Tennov, D. (1980). “The Clarification of Proximate Mechanisms.” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:200.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N. (1963). “On the Aims and Methods of Psychology.” Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie 20:410–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunnell, G. B. (1977). “Three Dimensions of Naturalness: An Expanded Definition of Field Research.” Psychological Bulletin 84:426–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Hoof, J. A. R. A. M. (1972). “A Comparative Approach to the Phylogeny of Laughter and Smiling.” In Hinde, R. (ed.), Non-verbal Communication. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verba, S. (1961). Small Groups and Political Behavior. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wahlke, J. (1979). “Pre-behavioralism in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 73:9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcott, C. (1981). “Bargaining Process Analysis: The Evolution of an Approach to Coding Verbal Interaction in a Political Context.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.Google Scholar
Walcott, C., and Hoppmann, P. T. (1978). “Interaction Analysis and Bargaining Behavior.” In Golembiewski, Robert T. (ed.), The Small Group in Political Science. Athens, Ga.: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Watts, M., ed. (1981). Biopolitics: Ethological and Physiological Approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1978). “Some Challenges for Future Group Research: Reflections on the Experience in Psychology.” In Golembiewski, R. T. (ed.), The Small Group in Political Science: The Last Two Decades of Development. Athens, Ga.: University of Georgia Press, pp. 482–504.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E.(in press). Systematic Observational Methods.Google Scholar
Weigel, R. M., and Johnson, R. P. (1981). “An Ethological Classification System for Verbal Behavior.” Ethology and Sociobiology 2:55–66.Google Scholar
Wiegele, T. C. (1978). “The Psychophysiology of Elite Stress in Five International Crises: A Preliminary Test of Voice Measurement Technique.” International Studies Quarterly 22:467–511.Google Scholar
Weisfeld, G., Omark, D., and Cronin, C. (1980). “A Longitudinal and Cross-sectional Study of Dominance in Boys.” In Omark, D., Strayer, F., and Freedman, D. (eds.), Dominance Relations: An Ethological View of Human Conflict and Social Interaction. New York: Garland Press, pp. 205–216.Google Scholar
Zabel, R. H., and Zabel, M. K. (1982). “Ethological Approaches with Autistic and Other Abnormal Populations.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 12:71–83.Google Scholar