Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:34:51.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction to the Special Issue—Life Science in Politics: Methodological Innovations and Political Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2022

Amanda Friesen Open the ORCID record for Amanda Friesen [Opens in a new window] ,
Aleksander Ksiazkiewicz Open the ORCID record for Aleksander Ksiazkiewicz [Opens in a new window]  and
Rose McDermott
Amanda Friesen*
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario, Canada
Aleksander Ksiazkiewicz
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, USA
Rose McDermott
Affiliation:
Brown University, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

We introduce the Special Issue on Life Science in Politics: Methodological Innovations and Political Issues. This issue of Politics and the Life Sciences is focused on the use of life science theory and methods to study political phenomena and the exploration of the intersection of science and political attitudes. This issue is the third in a series of special issues funded by the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences that adheres to the Open Science Framework for registered reports. Pre-analysis plans are peer reviewed and given in-principle acceptance before data are collected and/or analyzed, and the articles are published contingent upon the preregistration of the study being followed as proposed. We note various interpretations and challenges associated with studying the science of politics and discuss the contributions.

Type
Life Science in Politics: Methodological Innovations and Political Issues
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , Fall 2022 , pp. 155 - 160
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bierer, L. M., Bader, H. N., Daskalakis, N. P., Lehrner, A., Provençal, N., Wiechmann, T., & Yehuda, R. (2020). Intergenerational effects of maternal holocaust exposure on FKBP5 methylation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 177(8), 744–753.Google ScholarPubMed
Dashorst, P., Mooren, T. M., Kleber, R. J., de Jong, P. J., & Huntjens, R. J. (2019). Intergenerational consequences of the Holocaust on offspring mental health: a systematic review of associated factors and mechanisms. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 10(1), 1654065.Google ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez, F., Jin, R., & Wang, I. (2022). Racial and ethnic variation in the negativity bias-ideology connection: A registered report. Politics and the Life Sciences, 41(2), 232–255.Google Scholar
Goosby, B. J., Cheadle, J. E., & Mitchell, C. (2018). Stress-related biosocial mechanisms of discrimination and African American health inequities. Annual Review of Sociology, 44, 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landecker, H., & Panofsky, A. (2013). From social structure to gene regulation, and back: A critical introduction to environmental epigenetics for sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 333–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansell, J., Harell, A., Gidengil, E., & Stewart, P. A. (2021). Psychophysiology, cognition, and political differences: Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue. Politics and the Life Sciences, 40(2), 137–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Motta, M. (2022). The pre-political origins and policy consequences of environmental justice concern. Politics and the Life Sciences, 41(2), 182–199.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. B., Tybur, J. M., & Stewart, P. A. (2020). Disgust and political attitudes: Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue. Politics and the Life Sciences, 39(2), 129–134.Google ScholarPubMed
Prokosch, M., Smith, C., Kerry, N., & von Meding, J. (2022). Too strong to care? Investigating the links between formidability, worldviews, and views on climate and disaster. Politics and the Life Sciences, 41(2), 200–231.Google Scholar
Roseboom, T., de Rooij, S., & Painter, R. (2006). The Dutch famine and its long-term consequences for adult health. Early Human Development, 82(8), 485–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruisch, B., Von Mohr, M., Naber, M., Tsakiris, M., Fazio, R., & Scheepers, D. (2022). Sensitive liberals and unfeeling conservatives? Interoceptive sensitivity predicts political liberalism. Politics and the Life Sciences, 41(2), 256–275.Google Scholar
Silber, H., Gerdon, F., Bach, R., Kern, C., Keusch, F., & Kreuter, F. (2022). A preregistered vignette experiment on determinants of health data sharing behavior: Willingness to donate sensor data, medical records, and biomarkers. Politics and the Life Sciences, 41(2), 161–181.Google Scholar
Yehuda, R., Halligan, S. L., & Grossman, R. (2001). Childhood trauma and risk for PTSD: Relationship to intergenerational effects of trauma, parental PTSD, and cortisol excretion. Development and Psychopathology, 13(3), 733–753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed