Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-7lvjp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T22:17:30.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In the Matter of “Baby M”: Report from the Gruter Institute for Law and Behavioral Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Robin Fox
Robin Fox*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903
Get access

Extract

Since the Gruter Institute is interested in the mutual influence of law and behavioral science (in the broadest sense), it has evolved a policy of occasionally tackling ongoing cases as exemplars of this interaction at the “ground level” of case law. This is done partly to contrast such an approach with the more usual “philosopher king” pose adopted by scientists who wish to influence legislation. In common-law countries at least, the approach through case law merits experimental attention. To this end a working group1 of legal and scientific scholars was instituted to study the issues in the now notorious “Baby M” case, a case which was to set a precedent on the issue of surrogate mothering contracts and which would have wider implications for the legality of many of the new alternative birth technologies.

Type
Research in Progress
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 7 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Medicine and Political Behavior , August 1988 , pp. 77 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bateson, P. P. G. (1976). “Rules and Reciprocity in Behavioral Development.” In Bateson, P. P. G. and Hinde, R. (eds.), Growing Points in Ethology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blurton Jones, N. (1972). “Comparative Aspects of Mother-Child Contact.” In Blurton Jones, N. (ed.), Ethological Studies of Children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blurton Jones, N. (1975). “Ethology, Anthropology, and Childhood.” In Fox, R. (ed.), Biosocial Anthropology. London: Malaby Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, B. L., ed. (1980). Psychological Aspects of Pregnancy Birth and Bonding. New York: Human Sciences.Google Scholar
Brazelton, T. B. (1973). “Effects of Maternal Expectations on Early Infant Behavior.” Early Child Dev. Care 2: 259–273.Google Scholar
Bowlby, John (1969). Attachment and Loss I: Attachment. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Bowlby, John (1973). Attachment and Loss II: Separation. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Bowlby, John (1980). Attachment and Loss III: Loss. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Cloninger, C. R., Sigvardsson, S., Bohman, M., and van Knoring, A. (1982). “Predisposition to Petty Criminality in Swedish Adoptees: II Cross-fostering Analysis of Gene-Environment Interaction.” Arch. Gen Psychiatry 39: 1242–7.Google Scholar
Corbin, A. (1960). Treatise on the Law of Contracts. St. Paul, Minn.: West Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Count, E. W. (1973). Being and Becoming Human. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Deykin, E. Y., Campbell, L., and Patti, P. (1984). “The Postadoption Experience of Surrendering Parents.” Amer. J. Orthopsych. 54: 271–280.Google Scholar
Fox, R. (1985). “The Conditions of Sexual Evolution.” In Aries, P. and Bejin, A. (eds.), Western Sexuality. Oxford & New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goodall, J. (1971). In the Shadow of Man. New York: Dell.Google Scholar
Hamburg, D. A. (1974). “Coping Behavior in Life-Threatening Circumstances.” Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 23: 13–25.Google Scholar
Harlow, H. F. (1961). “The Development of Affectional Patterns.” In Foss, B. M. (ed.), Determinants of Infant Behavior, Vol. 1. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Harlow, H. F. (1974). “Induction and Alleviation of Depressive States in Monkeys.” In White, N. (ed.), Ethology and Psychiatry. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Harlow, H. F., and Harlow, M. K. (1965). “The Affectional Systems.” In Schrier, A. M., Harlow, H. F., and Stolnitz, F. (eds.), Behavior of Nonhuman Primates, Vol. 2. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hinde, R. A., and Spencer-Booth, Y. (1971). “Effects of Brief Separation from Mother on Rhesus Monkeys.” Science 173: 111–18.Google Scholar
Hofer, M. A. (1972). “A Psychoendocrine Study of Bereavement, Part 1.” Psychosomatic Medicine 36 (6): 481–91.Google Scholar
Hollinger, J. H. (1985). “From Coitus to Commerce: Legal and Social Consequences of Noncoital Reproduction.” J. Law Reform. 18 (4): 865–932.Google Scholar
Kagan, J. (1981). “Universals in Human Development.” In Munroe, R. H., Munroe, R. L., and Whiting, B. B. (eds.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Human Development. New York: Garland STPM Press.Google Scholar
Klaus, M. H., and Kennell, J. H., eds. (1982). Parent-Infant Bonding. St. Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
Konner, M. H. (1982). The Tangled Wing: Biological Constraints on the Human Spirit. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Konner, M. H., and Worthman, C. (1980). “Nursing Frequency among !Kung Hunter Gatherers.” Science 207: 788–91.Google Scholar
Mehler, J., and Fox, R., eds. (1985). Neonate Cognition: Beyond the Blooming Buzzing Confusion. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rheingold, H. R., ed. (1963). Maternal Behavior in Mammals New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rynearson, E. K. (1982). “Relinquishment and its Maternal Complications: A Preliminary Study.” Amer. J. Psychiatry 193 (3): 338–40.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. (1979). “The Case for Specific Performance.” Yale Law Journal 89: 271–289.Google Scholar
Seligman, M., and Maier, S. (1976). “Failure to Escape Traumatic Shock.” J. Exp. Psych. 74: 1–9.Google Scholar
Sorosky, A. D., Baran, A., and Pannor, R. (1978). The Adoption Triangle. Garden City, N. Y.: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
Suomi, S. J. (1975). “Depressive Behavior in Adult Monkeys Following Separation from Family Environment.” J. Abnormal and Social Psych. 84: 576–78.Google Scholar
Tulchinsky, D., and Ryan, K. J. (1980). Maternal-Fetal Endocrinology. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
Weiss, J., Glazer, H. I., and Pohorecky, L. A. (1976). “Coping Behavior and Neurochemical Changes in Rats: An Alternative Explanation for the Original Learned Helplessness Experiments.” In Servan, G. and Kling, A. (eds.), Animal Models in Human Psychobiology. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar