Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:32:04.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Federal Uncertainty or Inconsistency? Releasing the New Agricultural-Environmental Biotechnology Into the Fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Patrick Stewart  and
A. Ann Sorensen
Patrick Stewart
Affiliation:
Arkansas State University, USA
A. Ann Sorensen
Affiliation:
American Farmland Trust, USA
Get access

Abstract

This article reviews the regulation of the new agricultural-environmental biotechnology and recent changes in the regulatory framework in the United States. Regulations put in place in the mid-1980s were established due to concern over potential risks posed by products not yet released into the environment. Now that over a thousand small-scale field trials have been carried out and various new agricultural-environmental biotechnology products have been in farmers' fields for the past several years, questions are being raised about the current regulatory system by both proponents, who want greater deregulation due to the relative absence of ecological harm, and opponents, who warn against potential environmental catastrophe due to greater variety and amount of new agricultural-environmental products being released. Therefore, we focus on triggers for regulation, which appear to hinge on the “naturalness” of a product, and trends in field release of these products.

Type
Ecological Regulations
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 77 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, J.L. (1997). “An Introduction to FIFRA.” In Sorensen, A.A. (ed.), Environmental Protection Agency Plant Pesticide Workshop. DeKalb, IL: Center for Agriculture in the Environment.Google Scholar
Andersen, J.L. (1999). “Regulation of Plant Pesticides: Current Status.” Presented at International Conference on Emerging Technologies for Integrated Pest Management: Concepts, Research and Implementation, Raleigh, NC, March 8–10.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berg, P. et al. (1974). “Potential Biohazards of Recombinant DNA Molecules.” Science 185:303.Google Scholar
Bimber, B. (1998). “The Death of an Agency: OTA and Trophy Hunting in U.S. Budget Policy.” Policy Studies Review 15(2/3):202–25.Google Scholar
Biotechnology and the European Public Concerted Action Group (1997). “Europe Ambivalent on Biotechnology.” Nature 387:845–47.Google Scholar
EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (1994). “Microbial Pesticides: Experimental Use Permits and Notifications”. 59Federal Register 169, 45600–45615(September 1).Google Scholar
EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (1997). “Microbial Products of Biotechnology: Final Regulation under the Toxic Substances Control Act.” 62Federal Register 70, 17912–17958. (April 11).Google Scholar
Goldburg, R. et al. (1990). Biotechnology's Bitter Harvest: Herbicide Tolerant Crops and the Threat to Sustainable Agriculture. Washington, DC: The Biotechnology Working Group.Google Scholar
Hallman, W.K. and Metcalfe, J. (1993). Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnology: A Survey of New Jersey Residents. Ecosystem Policy Research Center, The New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.Google Scholar
Hardy, R.W.F. and Glass, D.J. (1985). “Our Investment: What Is at Stake.” Issues in Science and Technology (Spring):69–82.Google Scholar
Harrison, K. and Hoberg, G. (1994). Risk, Science and Politics. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Ho, M-W. (1998). Genetic Engineering: Dream or Nightmare? Bath, UK: Gateway Books.Google Scholar
Hoban, T.J. (1997). “Consumer Acceptance of Biotechnology: An International Perspective.” Nature Biotechnology (March 15):232–34.Google Scholar
Hoban, T.J. and Kendall, PA. (1993). Consumer Attitudes about the Use of Biotechnology in Agriculture and Food Production. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Hutton, P. (1997). “EPA Regulatory Requirements for Plant Pesticides.” In Sorensen, A.A. (ed.), Environmental Protection Agency Plant Pesticide Workshop. DeKalb, IL: Center for Agriculture in the Environment.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J.W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Second edition. New York: HarperCollins College.Google Scholar
Kough, J.L. (1997). “Rationale, Scope and Potential Data Requirements for Plant-Pesticides under FIFRA and FFDCA/FQPA.” In Sorensen, A.A. (ed.), Environmental Protection Agency Plant Pesticide Workshop. DeKalb, IL: Center for Agriculture in the Environment.Google Scholar
Krimsky, S. (1991). Biotechnics and Society: The Rise of Industrial Genetics. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Krimsky, S. and Wrubel, R. (1993). Agricultural Biotechnology: An Environmental Outlook. Medford, MA: Department of Urban and Environmental Policy, Tufts University.Google Scholar
Krimsky, S. and Wrubel, R. (1996). Agricultural Biotechnology and the Environment: Science, Policy and Social Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Milewski, E. (1997). “Overview of EPA's Plant-Pesticide Regulation.” In Sorensen, A.A. (ed.), Environmental Protection Agency Plant Pesticide Workshop. DeKalb, IL: Center for Agriculture in the Environment.Google Scholar
Miller, H.I. (1997). Policy Controversy in Biotechnology: An Insider's View. Austin, TX: R.G. Landes Company and Academic Press.Google Scholar
NBIAP (National Biologics Impact Assessment Program) (1996). “USDA's Office of Agricultural Biotechnology to Close.” ISB News Report (February). http://www.nbiap.vt.edu.Google Scholar
“Opportunities, Major Challenges Face U.S. Biotechnology” (1997). Food and Fiber Letter (August):3–4.Google Scholar
OSTP (Office of Science and Technology Policy) (1992). “Exercise of Federal Oversight within Scope of Statutory Authority: Planned Introductions of Biotechnology into the Environment.” Federal Register 57:6753–62.Google Scholar
OTA (Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress) (1992). A New Technological Era for American Agriculture. OTA-F-474, 309. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Plein, L.C. (1990). “Biotechnology: Issue Development and Evolution.” In Webber, D.J. (ed.), Biotechnology: Assessing Social Impacts and Policy Implication. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Plein, L.C. (1993). “Enduring Themes in Biotechnology Issue Framing: The Dilemma of Progress.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 4.Google Scholar
Rissler, J. and Mellon, M. (1993). Perils amidst the Promise: Ecological Risks of Transgenic Crops in a Global Market. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists.Google Scholar
Rissler, J. and Mellon, M. (1996). The Ecological Risks of Engineered Crops. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Russell, E.P. III (1997). “Lost among the Parts Per Billion: Ecological Protection at the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1970–1993.” Environmental History 2 (1):29–51.Google Scholar
Sorensen, A.A., ed. (1997). Environmental Protection Agency Plant Pesticide Workshop. DeKalb, IL: Center for Agriculture in the Environment.Google Scholar
Stewart, P.A. (1998). “Decision Making under Risk and Uncertainty: The Case of Agricultural Biotechnology.” DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Unpublished Dissertation.Google Scholar
Stewart, P.A. and Sorensen, A.A. (1995). “New Biotechnology and Agriculture: Regulatory Challenges.” Journal of Environmental Law and Practice 2 (5):40–49.Google Scholar
Thompson, P.B. (1988). “Agriculture, Biotechnology, and the Political Evaluation of Risk.” Policy Studies Journal 16:97–108.Google Scholar
Thompson, P.B. (1997). Food Biotechnology's Challenge to Cultural Integrity and Individual Consent. Hastings Center Report 27 (4):34–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torla, R. (1997). “Plant Pesticide Regulatory Impact Assessment.” In Sorensen, A.A. (ed.), Environmental Protection Agency Plant Pesticide Workshop. DeKalb, IL: Center for Agriculture in the Environment.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1982). “Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” In Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (eds.), Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture) (1987). “Introduction of Organisms and Products Altered or Produced through Genetic Engineering Which Are Plant Pests or Which There Is Reason to Believe Are Plant Pests.” 52Federal Register 115 (June 16).Google Scholar
USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture) (1993). “Genetically Engineered Organisms and Products: Notification Procedures for the Introduction of Certain Regulated Articles; and Petition for Nonregulated Status.” 58Federal Register 60, 17044–17059(March 31).Google Scholar
USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture) (1997). “Genetically Engineered Organisms and Products; Simplification of Requirements and Procedures for Genetically Engineered Organisms.” 62Federal Register 85, 23945–23958(May 2).Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. (1991). Public Policy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1994). Molecular Politics: Developing American and British Regulatory Policy for Genetic Engineering, 1972–1982. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zehr, S.C. (1994). “Flexible Interpretations of ‘Acid Rain’ and the Construction of Scientific Uncertainty in Political Settings.” Politics and the Life Sciences 13:205–16.Google Scholar