Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:22:12.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Versions of Pastoral, from A to Z

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Glendon Schubert
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles and Commentaries
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , February 1983 , pp. 114 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alker, H. R. Jr. (1974). “Are There Structural Models of Voluntaristic Social Action?” Quality and Quantity 8:199–246.Google Scholar
Alker, H. R. Jr. (1975). “Polimetrics: Its Descriptive Foundations.” In Greenstein, F. and Polsby, N. (eds.), Handbook of Political Science. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Alker, H. R. Jr. (1976). “Research Paradigms and Mathematical Politics.” In Wildenmann, R. (ed.), Sozial wissenschaft liches Jahrbuck fur Politik, Band 5. pp, 13–50.Google Scholar
Alker, H. R. Jr. (1979). “From Information Processing Research to the Sciences of Human Communication.” Informatique et Sciences Humaines. 40-41: 407–420.Google Scholar
Alker, H. R. Jr. (1981). “From Political Cybernetics to Global Modeling.” In Merritt, R. and Russett, B. (eds.), From National Development to Global Community. London: Allen and Unwin, pp. 353–378.Google Scholar
Alker, H. R. Jr. (1982). “Logic, Dialectics and Politics.” In Alker, H. R. Jr. (ed.), Dialectical Logics for the Political Sciences. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, vol. 7. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 65–94.Google Scholar
Alker, H. R. Jr., and Hurwitz, R. (1981). Resolving Prisoner's Dilemmas. Test edition. Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel, and Coleman, James (1960). The Politics of Developing Areas. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel, and Genco, Stephen (1978). “Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics.” World Politics 29:489–523.Google Scholar
Aubert, Vilhelm (1959). “Chance in Social Affairs.” Inquiry 2:1–24.Google Scholar
Beck, Henry (1976). “Neuropsychological Servosystems, Consciousness and the Problem of Embodiment.” Behavioral Science 21:139–160.Google Scholar
Bentley, Arthur F. (1908). The Process of Government. Bloomington, Ind.: Principia Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. (1976). The Restructuring of Political and Social Theory. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Bohm, David (1957). Causality and Chance in Modern Physics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bohm, David (1965). The Special Theory of Relativity. New York: W. A. Benjamin.Google Scholar
Bohm, David (1971). “Quantum Theory as an Indication of a New Order in Physics, Part A.” Foundations of Physics 1:359–381.Google Scholar
Bohm, David (1973). “Quantum Theory as an Indication of a New Order in Physics, Part B.” Foundations of Physics 3:139–168.Google Scholar
Bohm, David (1977). “Heisenberg's Contributions to Physics.” In Price, William and Chissick, Seymour (eds.), The Uncertainty Principle and Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. New York: John Wiley, pp. 559–563.Google Scholar
Bohm, David (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bohr, Niels (1958). Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Capra, Fritjof (1975). The Tao of Physics. London: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar
Capra, Fritjof (1980). “The New Physics: Implications for Psychology.” American Theosophist 68:114–120.Google Scholar
Cocconi, G. (1970). “The Role of Complexity in Nature.” In Conversi, M. (ed.), Evolution of Particle Physics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 81–88.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. (1954). “An Expository Analysis of Some of Rashevsky's Social Behavior Models.” In Lazarsfeld, Paul F. (ed.), Mathematical Thinking in the Social Sciences. Glencoe, III.: The Free Press, pp. 105–155.Google Scholar
Comfort, Alex (1979). “The Cartesian Observer Revisited: Ontological Implications of the Homuncular Illusion.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 2:211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comfort, Alex (1980). “Demonic and Historical Models in Biology.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 3: 207–215.Google Scholar
Comfort, Alex (1981). “The Implications of an Implicate.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 4:363–374.Google Scholar
Committee for the Advancement of Teaching, American Political Science Association (1951). Goals for Political Science. New York: William Sloane.Google Scholar
Corning, Peter (1974). “Politics and the Evolutionary Process.” In Dobzhansky, Theodosius et al. (eds.), Evolutionary Biology, vol. 7. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 253–294.Google Scholar
Cory, Gerald (1974). “The Biopsychological Basis of Political Socialization and Political Culture.” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Crombie, Alistair (1961). “Quantification in Medieval Physics.” In Woolf, Harry (ed.), Quantification: A History of the Meaning of Measurement in the Natural and Social Sciences. Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, pp. 13–30.Google Scholar
Crook, John H. (1980). The Evolution of Human Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert (1961). “The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest.” American Political Science Review 55:763–772.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, F. R., and McCarthy, T. (1977). Understanding and Social Inquiry. South Bend, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Davies, James C. (1963). Human Nature in Politics. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Davies, James C. (1969). “The Psychobiology of Political Behavior: Some Provocative Developments.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Davies, James C. (1976). “Ions of Emotion and Political Behavior: A Prototheory.” In Somit, Albert (ed.), Biology and Politics. Paris: Mouton, pp. 97–125.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl (1963). The Nerves of Government. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Morton (1968). “Field Theory.” International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 5:406–417.Google Scholar
Easton, David (1965). A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Easton, David (1969). “The New Revolution in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 63:1051–1061.Google Scholar
Edelman, Gerald, and Mountcastle, Vernon (1978). The Mindful Brain. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz (1963). The Behavioral Persuasion in Politics. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz, and March, James, eds. (1969). Political Science. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Futuyama, Douglas (1979). Evolutionary Biology. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Gamow, George (1966). Thirty Years That Shook Physics. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Geigle, Ray (1977). “Theoretical Considerations of Psychobiological Adaptation and Political Response Predisposition.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Goldman, Stanford (1980). “A Unified Theory of Biology and Physics.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures. 3:331–360.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen J. (1980). “The Evolutionary Biology of Constraint.” Daedalus 109:39–52.Google Scholar
Graber, Doris (1982a). “Strategies for Processing Political Information.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Milwaukee.Google Scholar
Graber, Doris (1982b). “Variations in Political Information Processing.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver.Google Scholar
Graham, George, and Carey, George, eds. (1972). The Post-Behavioral Era. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
Grunbaum, Adolf (1973). Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. 2nd ed.Boston: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Guillemin, Victor (1968). The Story of Quantum Mechanics. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Haas, Michael (1982). “Paradigms of Explanation in Political Science: Metaphysical Underpinnings.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver.Google Scholar
Haddow, Anna (1939). Political Science in American Colleges and Universities, 1636-1900. New York: D. Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
Handler, Philip, ed. (1970). Biology and the Future of Man. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy (1979). “Feminist Theory and the Development of Revolutionary Strategy.” In Eisenstein, Zillah (ed.), Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Heelan, Patrick (1980). “Comments on ‘A Unified Theory of Biology and Physics’ by S. Goldman.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 3:361–362.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner (1958). Physics and Philosophy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner (1974). Across the Frontiers. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner (1977). “Remarks on the Origin of the Relations of Uncertainty.” In Price, William and Chissick, Seymour (eds.), The Uncertainty Principle and Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. New York: John Wiley, pp. 3–6.Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel M. Jr. (1979). “Evolutionary Epistemology and Political Knowledge.” In Falco, Maria J. (ed.), Through the Looking-Glass: Epistemology and the Conduct of Political Inquiry. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America, pp. 329–365.Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel M. Jr. (1982a). “Biopolitics and the Evolution of Inquiry in Political Science.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1:5–16.Google Scholar
Hines, Samuel M. Jr. (1982b). “Ordering Political Space.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Political Science Association, San Diego.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Irving Louis (1979). “Paradigms of Political Psychology.” Political Psychology 1:99–103.Google Scholar
Ingber, Lester (1981). “Toward a Unified Brain Theory.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 4:211–224.Google Scholar
Jaynes, Julian (1977). The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Abraham (1964). The Conduct of Inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
Karl, Barry (1974). Charles E. Merriam and the Study of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Mark (1972). “Quantum Evolution and Punctuated Equilibria in Continuous Genetic Characters.” American Naturalist 119:833–848.Google Scholar
Kitchin, William (1982). “Hemispheric Lateralization and Political Communication.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver.Google Scholar
Konner, Melvin (1982). “She & He: Different Brains?” Science 82 3(7):54–61.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Landau, Martin (1961). “On the Use of Metaphor in Political Analysis.” Social Research 28:331–353.Google Scholar
Landau, Martin (1965). “Due Process of Inquiry.” American Behavioral Scientist 9(2):4–10.Google Scholar
Landau, Martin (1968). “On the Use of Functional Analysis in American Political Science.” Social Research 35:48–75.Google Scholar
Landau, Martin (1972). Political Theory and Political Science. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Laponce, Jean (1975). “Spatial Archetypes and Political Perception.” American Political Science Review 69:11–20.Google Scholar
Laponce, Jean (1978). “Relating Biological, Physical and Political Phenomena: The Case of Up and Down.” Social Science Information 17:385–397.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D. (1963). The Future of Political Science. New York: Prentice-Hall/Atherton.Google Scholar
Lewin, Kurt (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Lippitt, Ronald (1968). “Lewin, Kurt.” International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 9:266–270.Google Scholar
Livingston, Robert B. (1978). Sensory Processing, Perception, and Behavior. New York: Raven.Google Scholar
Lumsden, Charles, and Wilson, Edward (1981). Genes, Mind, and Culture: The Coevolutionary Process. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lumsden, Charles, and Wilson, Edward (1982). “Precis of Genes, Mind, and Culture.“ Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:1–37.Google Scholar
MacArthur, Robert (1972). Geographical Ecology: Patterns in the Distribution of Species. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Manheim, Jarol (1982). The Politics Within: A Primer in Political Attitudes and Behavior 2nd ed.New York: Longman.Google Scholar
March, James G. (1956). “Sociological Jurisprudence Revisited, A Review (More or Less) of Max Gluckman.” Stanford Law Review 8:499–534.Google Scholar
Margenau, Henry (1950). The Nature of Physical Reality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. (1970). “Genes, Language, and Evolution.” Semiotica 2:295–320.Google Scholar
McClelland, Charles (1971). “Field Theory and System Theory in International Relations.” In Lepawsky, Albert, Beuhrig, Edward, and Lasswell, Harold D. (eds.), The Search for World Order. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
McCoy, Charles, and Playford, John, eds. (1967). Apolitical Politics. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Merriam, Charles E. (1921). “The Present State of the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 15: 173–185.Google Scholar
Merriam, Charles E. (1925). New Aspects of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mey, Harald (1965). Field-Theory: A Study of Its Applications in the Social Sciences. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Moon, D. (1975). “The Logic of Political Inquiry: A Synthesis of Opposed Perspectives.” In Greenstein, F. and Polsby, N. (eds.), Handbook of Political Science, vol. 1. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, pp. 131–228.Google Scholar
Morowitz, Harold J. (1980). “Rediscovering the Mind.” Psychology Today 14(3):12–18.Google Scholar
Munro, William Bennett (1928). “Physics and Politics—An Old Analogy Revisited.” American Political Science Review 22:1–11.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter F. (1964). The Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Newsweek (1982). “Enigmas of Evolution.” March 29:44–49.Google Scholar
Pelletier, Kenneth (1978). Toward a Science of Consciousness. New York: Delacorte Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven (1981a). “Cognitive Development, Biology, and Political Socialization.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Mannheim, West Germany.Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven (1981b). “Sociobiology and Ideas-Become-Real: Case Study and Assessment.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 4:125–143.Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven (1982a). “The Human Brain and Hypostatizing.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven (1982b). “Neurophysiology and Rationality in Political Thinking.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver.Google Scholar
Peterson, Steven, Somit, Albert, and Slagter, Robert (1981). “Biopolitics: 1980-1981 Update.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1965). Of Clouds and Clocks. St. Louis, Mo.: Washington University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1972). Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, and Eccles, John (1977). The Self and Its Brain. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Pribram, Karl (1971). Languages of the Brain. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Pribram, Karl (1979). “Behaviourism, Phenomenology and Holism in Psychology: A Scientific Analysis.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 2:65–72.Google Scholar
Pribram, Karl, and McGuinness, Diane (1975). “Arousal, Activation, and Effort in the Control of Attention.” Psychological Review 82:116–149.Google Scholar
Rao, , Madhava, B. S. (1962). Principles of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. India: Annamalai University.Google Scholar
Rashevsky, Nicolas (1938). Mathematical Biophysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rashevsky, Nicolas (1947). Mathematical Theory of Human Relations. Bloomington, Ind.: Principia Press.Google Scholar
Rashevsky, Nicolas (1951). Mathematical Biology of Social Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rashevsky, Nicolas (1954). “Two Models: Imitative Behavior and Distribution of Status.” In Lazarsfeld, Paul F. (ed.), Mathematical Thinking in the Social Sciences. New York: The Free Press, pp. 67–104.Google Scholar
Ray, James Lee (1982). “Understanding Rummel.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 26:161–187.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans (1956). The Direction of Time. Los Angeles, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans (1958). The Philosophy of Space and Time. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans (1965). The Theory of Relativity and A Priori Knowledge. Los Angeles, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Morley (1938). Bio-Politics: An Essay in the Physiology and Pathology of Politics of the Social and Somatic Organism. London: J. M. Dent and Sons.Google Scholar
Robinson, James A. (1957). “Newtonianism and the Constitution.” Midwest Journal of Political Science. 1:252–266.Google Scholar
Rodman, John (1980). “Paradigm Change in Political Science: An Ecological Perspective.” American Behavioral Scientist 24(1):49–78.Google Scholar
Roederer, Juan (1978). “On the Relationship between Human Brain Functions and the Foundations of Physics, Science, and Technology.” Foundations of Physics 8:423–438.Google Scholar
Rogers, Linda, TenHouten, Warren, Kaplan, Charles, and Gardiner, Martin (1977). “Hemispheric Specialization of Language: An EEG Study of Bilingual Hopi Indian Children.” International Journal of Neuroscience 8:1–6.Google Scholar
Rosen, Robert (1980). “Comments on ‘A Unified Theory of Biology and Physics’ by S. Goldman.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 3:363–365.Google Scholar
Rummel, Rudolph (1970). Applied Factor Analysis. Evanston, III.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Rummel, Rudolph (1975). The Dynamic Psychological Field. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Rummel, Rudolph (1976). “The Roots of Faith.” In Rosenau, James N. (ed.), In Search of Global Patterns. New York: The Free Press, pp. 10–30.Google Scholar
Rummel, Rudolph (1977). Field Theory Evolving. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Rummel, Rudolph (1978). National Attributes and Behavior. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Rummel, Rudolph (1979). War, Power, Peace. Understanding Conflict and War, vol. 4. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael (1979). Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense? Boston: D. ReidelGoogle Scholar
Sachs, Mendel (1973). The Field Concept in Contemporary Science. Springfield, III.: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley (1980). Space, Time, and Motion. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sambursky, Shmuel (1975). Physical Thought from the Presocratics to the Quantum Physicists. New York: PICA Press.Google Scholar
Schrodinger, Erwin (1944). What is Life? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1957). “The Public Interest' in Administrative Decision Making: Theorem, Theosophy, or Theory?” American Political Science Review 50:346–368.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1958). “Political Science Research and Instruction in Administrative Law.” Journal of Legal Education 10:294–311.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1961). “A Psychometric Model of the Supreme Court.” American Behavioral Scientist 5(3): 14–18.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1962). “The 1960-61 Term of the Supreme Court: A Psychological Analysis.” American Political Science Review 56:90–107.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1963). “From Public Law to Judicial Behavior.” In Schubert, Glendon (ed.), Judicial Decision-Making. New York: The Free Press, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1965). Judicial Policy-Making: The Political Role of the Courts. Chicago: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1966). “The Future of Public Law.” George Washington Law Review 34:593–614.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1967a). “Academic Ideology and the Study of Adjudication.” American Political Science Review 61:106–129.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1967b). “Ideologies and Attitudes, Academic and Judicial.” Journal of Politics 29:3–40.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1967c). “The Rhetoric of Constitutional Change.” Journal of Public Law 16:16–50.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1968). “Behavioral Jurisprudence.” Law and Society Review 2:407–442.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1973). “Biopolitical Behavior: The Nature of the Political Animal.” Polity 6:240–275.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1975). Human Jurisprudence: Public Law as Political Science. Honolulu, Hawaii: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1976). “Politics as a Life Science: How and Why the Impact of Modern Biology Will Revolutionize the Study of Political Behavior.” In Somit, Albert (ed.), Biology and Politics. Paris: Mouton, pp. 155–195.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1981). “Brain Science and Political Thinking.” Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Mannheim, West Germany.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1982a). “Epigenesis: The Newer Synthesis?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5(1):24–25.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1982b). “The Evolution of Inquiry in Biopolitics.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1:20–21.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1982c). “Some Implications of Brain Science for Political Science.” Occasional Papers in Political Science 1(4): 165–200. Department of Political Science, University of Hawaii-Manoa.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon(forthcoming/a). “The Biopolitics of Sex: Gender, Genetics, and Epigenetics.” Women and Politics, a special symposium issue edited by Watts, Meredith.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon(forthcoming/b). “Psychobiological Politics.” Canadian Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon(forthcoming/c). “Sexual Differences in Political Behavior.” In Hall, Roberta L. (ed.), Male-Female Differences: A Biocultural Perspective. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Michael (1981). Language and Political Understanding. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert, ed. (1976). Biology and Politics. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert, Peterson, Steven A., Richardson, William D., and Goldfischer, David S. (1980). The Literature of Biopolitics. DeKalb, III.: Program for Biosocial Research, Northern Illinois University.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert, and Tanenhaus, Joseph (1967). The Development of Political Science. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Sorokin, Pitrim (1964). Sociocultural Causality, Space, Time. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
Stanley, Steven (1979). Macroevolution: Pattern and Process. San Francisco, Calif.: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Stanley, Steven (1981). The New Evolutionary Timetable: Fossils, Genes, and the Origin of Species. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stapp, Henry (1972). “The Copenhagen Interpretation and the Nature of Space-Time.” American Journal of Physics 40:1098–1116.Google Scholar
Stent, Gunther (1969). The Coming of the Golden Age. Garden City, N.Y.: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
Storing, Herbert, ed. (1962). Essays on the Scientific Study of Politics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
TenHouten, Warren, and Kaplan, Charles (1973). Science and Its Mirror Image. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Thomas, Tracy Y. (1930). “On the Unified Field Theory, I.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 16: 761–776.Google Scholar
Truman, David (1951). The Governmental Process. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Truman, David (1955). “The Impact on Political Science of the Revolution in the Behavioral Sciences.” In Bailey, Stephen K. et al. (eds.), Research Frontiers in Politics and Government. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, pp. 202–232.Google Scholar
Ushenko, Andrew (1937). The Philosophy of Relativity. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Ushenko, Andrew (1946). Power and Events. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wahlke, John (1976). “Observations of Biopolitical Study.” In Somit, Albert (ed.), Biology and Politics. Paris: Mouton, pp. 253–259.Google Scholar
Wahlke, John (1979). “Pre-Behavioralism in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 73:9–31.Google Scholar
Wallas, Graham (1908). Human Nature in Politics. Boston: Houghton.Google Scholar
Watson, James D. (1968). The Double Helix. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Harvey, and Danielli, James (1982). “Constructional Biology.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 5:11–14.Google Scholar
Wheeler, John A. (1962). “Curved Empty Space-Time as the Building Material of the Physical World: An Assessment.” In Nagel, Ernest, Suppes, Patrick, and Tarski, Alfred (eds.), Logic and Philosophy of Science. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, pp. 361–374.Google Scholar
White, Elliott (1980). “The End of the Empty Organism: Human Neurobiology, Classical Social Science, and Political Learning.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
White, Elliott (1981a). “The Neurobiological Basis of Human Action.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Denver.Google Scholar
White, Elliott (1981b). “Sociobiology, Neurobiology and Political Socialization.” Micropolitics 1:113–144.Google Scholar
White, Elliott (1982a). “Brain Science and the Emergence of Neuropolitcs.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1:23–25.Google Scholar
White, Elliott (1982b). “Clouds, Clocks, Brains and Political Learning.” Micropolitics 2:279–309.Google Scholar
Wiegele, Thomas C. (1979). Biopolitics: Search for a More Human Political Science. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Williams, George (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy (1955). The Study of International Relations. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Zukav, Gary (1979). The Dancing Wu Li Masters: An Overview of the New Physics. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar