Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:23:28.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

To Furnish a Workplace Free from Recognized Hazards: OSHA, State Occupational Safety and Health Agencies, and Fetal Protection Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Suzanne U. Samuels
Suzanne U. Samuels*
Affiliation:
Seton Hall University, USA
Get access

Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court's 1991 decision in United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls capped a decade of adjudication of fetal protection policies under Title VII. In its decision, the Supreme Court barred the use of these policies, holding that the policies constituted unlawful gender discrimination. Prior to Johnson Controls, employers had justified these policies, which barred “fertile” women from certain workplaces, by contending that the workplace was not safe for women or their fetuses. Given this implicit disclosure by employers that their workplaces were unsafe, it is surprising that federal and state occupational safety and health agencies, charged with ensuring that employers furnish a workplace free from recognized hazards, did not play a larger role in the debate over these policies. This article examines the response of these agencies to the proliferation of fetal protection policies in the 1980s. It concludes that neither federal nor state occupational safety and health agencies crafted an adequate response to these policies during these years.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , August 1993 , pp. 243 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Cyanamid (1984). See Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers v. American Cyanamid.Google Scholar
Bertin, J.E. (1989). “Reproductive Hazards in the Workplace.” In Cohen, S. and Taub, N. (eds.), Reproductive Laws for the 1990s. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press.Google Scholar
Blank, R. (1992). “Fetal Protection Policies in the Workplace: Continuing Controversy in Light of Johnson Controls.” Politics and the Life Sciences 11:215–29.Google Scholar
Bokat, S.A. and Thompson, H.A. III (1988). Occupational Safety and Health Law. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.Google Scholar
Bollier, D. (1984). “The Emasculation of OSHA.” Business and Society Review 51:37–41.Google Scholar
Bureau of National Affairs (1990). “Awareness of Fetal Risks in Workplace: ‘An Emerging Issue.’” Occupational Safety and Health Reporter 20:25–26.Google Scholar
Buss, E. (1986). “Getting Beyond Discrimination: A Regulatory Solution to the Problem of Fetal Hazards in the Workplace.” The Yale Law Journal 95:554–77.Google Scholar
Carle, S.D. (1987). “A Hazardous Mix: Discretion to Disclose and Incentives to Suppress Under OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard.” Yale Law Reviews 97:581–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherner-Maneval, W.A. (1985). “Occupational Safety and Health—Employer Policy Excluding Fertile Female Workers Permitted Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act—Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union v. American Cyanamid.” Temple Law Quarterly 58:955.Google Scholar
Dube, L.E. Jr. (1985). “OSHA's Communication Standard: ‘Right to Know’ Comes to the Workplace.” Labor Law Journal 36:696–701.Google Scholar
Evans-Stanton, S. (1987). “Gender Specific Regulations in the Chemical Workplace.” Santa Clara Law Review 27:364.Google Scholar
Freedman, W. (1990). The Law and Occupational Injury, Disease, and Death. New York: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
Frumin, E. (1991). Interview with the author. Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union, New York, NY, January 17.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, W.J. (1986). “OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard: The Early Returns.” Employee Relations Law Journal 12:313–18.Google Scholar
International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc. (1989). 886 F.2d 871 (7th dr.).Google Scholar
International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc. (1991). 111 S.Ct. 1196.Google Scholar
LaGrande, D. (1990). Interview with the author. Communications Workers of America, New York, NY, December 27.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. (1985). “OCAW v. American Cyanamid: The Shrinking of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 133:1167–91.Google Scholar
Marcus, D. (1990). “OSHA's Expanding Hazard Communication Requirements.” Natural Resources and Environment 4:49–50.Google Scholar
Moran, R.D. (1989). OSHA Handbook. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes, Inc.Google Scholar
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (1988). “Proposed Guidelines for Assessing Female Reproductive Risk,” and “Proposed Guidelines for Assessing Male Reproductive Risk and Request for Comments.” 53Federal Register 126:24,883–47and 24,849-69.Google Scholar
New York Times (1990). “Rules on Video Display Terminals in Workplace Are Backed in San Francisco.” December 18, A18.Google Scholar
New York Times (1991). “Research on Birth Defects Shifts to Raws in Sperm.” January 1, A1.Google Scholar
Nothstein, G.B. and Ayres, J.P. (1981). “Sex-Based Considerations of Differentiation in the Workplace: Exploring the Biomedical Interface Between OSHA and Title VII.” Villanova Law Review 26:267–69.Google Scholar
Ocker, K. (1988). “OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard.” Idaho Law Review 25:619–29.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress (1985). Reproductive Hazards in the Workplace. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers v. American Cyanamid Co. (1984). 741 F.2d 444.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, J.T. (1985). “Driving a Soft Bargain: Unions, Toxic Materials, and Right to Know Legislation.” Harvard Environmental Law Review 9:307–29.Google Scholar
Paul, M., Daniels, C., and Robosky, R. (1989). “Corporate Response to Reproductive Hazards in the Workplace: Results of the Family, Work, and Health Survey.” American Journal of Industrial Medicine 16:267–80.Google Scholar
Rothstein, M.A. (1984). Medical Screening of Workers. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.Google Scholar
Ruggerio, C. (1989). “Referral of Toxic Chemical Regulation Under the TSCA: EPA's Administrative Dumping Ground,” Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 17:75–122.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S.A. and McGarity, T.O. (1989). “Reorienting OSHA: Regulatory Alternatives and Legislative Reform.” Yale Journal on Regulation (1989): 1–63.Google Scholar
United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc. (1989, 1991). See International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, General Accounting Office (1990). “Survey of Reproductive and Developmental Hazards.” Unpublished survey provided by Barbara Chapman, U.S. GAO.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, House of Representatives (1990). Subcommittee on Labor and Education. Text of subcommittee hearing provided by OSHA official.Google Scholar
Vig, N.J. and Kraft, M.E. (1984). Environmental Policy in the 1980s: Reagan's New Agenda. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Williams, W.W. (1981). “Firing the Woman to Protect the Fetus: The Reconciliation of Fetal Protection with Employment Opportunity Goals under Title VII.” The Georgetown Law Review 69:641–704.Google Scholar