No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Till Death Do Them Part?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 May 2016
Extract
We have read the commentaries with great interest. They vary greatly regarding the possibility of achieving a general model for separatist conflict solution, and there are certainly both practical problems as well as difficult priorities of principles. Several issues are addressed by more than one commentator, so we chose a discussion by issue rather than by commentator.
- Type
- Roundtable Response
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences
References
Beckstrom, J.H. (1993). Darwinism Applied: Evolutionary Paths to Social Goals. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Connor, W. (1994). Ethnocentrism: The Quest for Understanding. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ike, B.W. (1987). “Man's Limited Sympathy as a Consequence of His Evolution in Small Kin Groups.” In Reynolds, V., Falger, V., and Vine, I. (eds.), The Sociobiology of Ethnocentrism: Evolutionary Dimensions of Xenophobia, Discrimination, Racism and Nationalism. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. (1983). Modern Times A History of the World from the Twenties to the Eighties. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
Reynolds, V., Falger, V., and Vine, I., eds. (1987). The Sociobiology of Ethnocentrism: Evolutionary Dimensions of Xenophobia, Discrimination, Racism and Nationalism. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Shaw, R.W. and Wong, Y. (1989). Genetic Seeds of Warfare: Evolution, Nationalism and Patriotism. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Stein, G.J. (1987). “The Biological Bases of Ethnocentrism, Racism and Nationalism in National Socialism.” In Reynolds, V., Falger, V., and Vine, I. (eds.), The Sociobiology of Ethnocentrism: Evolutionary Dimensions of Xenophobia, Discrimination, Racism and Nationalism. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Tullberg, B. and Tullberg, J. (1996). “On Human Altruism: The Discrepancy between Normative and Factual Conclusions.” Oikos 24(2):327–29.Google Scholar