Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:20:35.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching Nature, to Learn from Nature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Alfredo Milanaccio
Alfredo Milanaccio*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Sociali, Università di Torino, Via S. Ottavio, 20 10124 Turin Italy
Get access

Abstract

This article describes some aspects of an Italian didactic-pedagogic experiment about interaction between “town” pupils and natural environments. The project's general philosophy is to try to make pupils aware of our condition as “biocultural beings,” as results of biological, technological, and cultural co-evolution. The presence of extensive natural, cultural, and technological resources at the site where the experiment takes place favors such an awareness.

Some examples of teaching techniques designed especially to introduce pupils to the difficult but necessary subject matter of co-evolution are also described. Such teaching techniques have as their main goal to make the pupils themselves able to construct a logical network of questions, rather than in teachers giving them already prepared answers.

The as yet unresolved problems, which concern the training of teachers steeped in traditional methods, are also briefly described.

Type
Specific Courses in Politics and the Life Sciences
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , August 1986 , pp. 83 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R. D. (1975). “The Search for a General Theory of Behavior.” Behavioral Science 20: 77–100.Google Scholar
Allen, T. F. H., and Starr, T. (1982). Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. San Francisco, Calif.: Chandler Publishing.Google Scholar
Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and Nature. A Necessary Unity. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Benoist, J. (1975). Tyrannie du Logos. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
van den Berghe, P. L. (1975). Man in Society: A Biosocial View. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Blute, M. (1979). “Sociocultural Evolutionism.” Behavioral Science 24: 46–59.Google Scholar
Bocchi, G. L., and Cezuti, M., eds. (1979). La sfida delta complessita. Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Capra, F. (1982). The Rising Point: Science, Society and Rising Culture. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Chagnon, N. A., and Irons, W., eds. (1979). Evolutionary Biology And Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective. North Scituate, Mass.: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
Corning, P. A. (1983). The Synergism Hypothesis: A Theory of Progressive Evolution. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
von Cranach, M., ed. (1976). Methods of Inference from Animal to Human Behavior. The Hague-Chicago: Mouton-Aldine.Google Scholar
von Cranach, M., ed. (1979). Human Ethology: Claims and Limits of a New Discipline. Paris-Cambridge: Maison des Sciences de I'Homme-Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crozier, M., and Friedberg, E. (1977). L'acteur et le système. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1982). The Extended Phenotype. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Delattre, P., and Thellier, M., eds. (1979). Elaboration et justification des modèles. Paris: Maloine.Google Scholar
Ellul, J. (1978). “Symbolic Functions, Technology and Society.” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 3: 207–218.Google Scholar
von Foerster, H. (1982). Observing Systems. Seaside, Calif.: Intersystems Publications.Google Scholar
Frisby, J. (1981). Seeing. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallino, L. (1980). La società perchè cambia, come funziona. Un'introduzione sistemica alla sociologia. Torino: Paravia.Google Scholar
Gallino, L. (1984). “Tecnologia e società.” Enciclopedia del Novecento. Roma: Istituto dell'Enciclopedia Italiana, VII: 414–426.Google Scholar
Griffin, D. R., ed. (1982). Animal Mind-Human Mind. Berlin: Springer Verlag International.Google Scholar
Haken, H. (1983). Synergetics: An Introduction. New York: Springer Verlag International.Google Scholar
Hesse, M. B. (1963). Models and Analogies in Science. London: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
Hines, S. M. Jr. (1982). “Politics and the Evolution of Inquiry in Political Science.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1: 5–37. With commentaries.Google Scholar
Ho, M-N., and Saunders, P. T., eds. (1984). Beyond New-Darwinism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, D. R., and Dennett, D. C., eds. (1981). The Mind's I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self and Soul. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Holton, G. (1978). The Scientific Imagination: Case Studies. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jantsch, E. (1980). The Self-Organizing Universe. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Jantsch, E., and Waddington, C. H. (1976). Evolution and Consciousness: Human Systems in Transition. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Konner, M. (1982). The Tangled Wing: Biological Constraints on the Human Spirit. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Koyré, A. (1948). “Du monde de l'”à-peu-près” à I'univers de la précision.” Critique 28: 3–16.Google Scholar
Kubat, L., and Zeman, J., eds. (1975). Entropy and Information in Science and Philosophy. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1977). The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I., and Musgrave, A. M., eds. (1970). Criticism and the Growth of the Knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laszlo, E. (1972). Introduction to Systems Philosophy. New York: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Lenski, G., and Lenski, J. (1982). Human Societies: An Introduction to Macrosociology 4th ed.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1964). Le geste et la parole. Technique et langage. 2 vols. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Livingstone, P., ed. (1984). Disorder and Order. Stanford, Calif.: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
Lopreato, J. (1984). Human Nature and Biocultural Evolution. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Lumsden, C. J., and Wilson, E. O. (1981). Genes, Mind and Culture: The Coevolutionary Process. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of Living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. J. (1985). The Tree of Knowledge. Boston, Mass.: New Science.Google Scholar
Midgley, M. (1978). Beast and Man: The Roots of Human Nature. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Milanaccio, A., ed. (1985). Un ponte fra paradigmi. Filogenesi ed epigenesi del comportamento sociale umano. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Milanaccio, A., ed. (in press). “Sociologia vs. sociobiologia. Note da una bibliografia.” Ouaderni di Sociologia.Google Scholar
Moles, A., and Rohmer, E. (1977). Théories des actes. Vers une écologie des action. Paris: Castermann.Google Scholar
Morin, E. (1973). Le paradigme perdu. La nature humaine. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Morin, E. (1977). La Méthode. Vol. I. La Nature de la Nature. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Morin, E. (1980). La Méthode. Vol. II. La Vie de la Vie. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Morin, E. (1981). Pour sortir du XX Siècle. Paris: Ferdinand Nathan.Google Scholar
Morin, E. (1982). Science avec conscience. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Morin, E., and Piattelli-Palmarini, M., eds. (1974). L'unité de I'hommé. 3 Vols. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1968). Essai sur I'historie humaine de la nature. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1972). La société contre nature. Paris: UGE.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1974). Hommes domestiques et hommes sauvages. Paris: UGE.Google Scholar
Ozer, M., ed. (1979). A Cybernetic Approach to the Assessment of Children. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1967). Biologie et Connaissance. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1976). Le comportement, moteur de l'évolution. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. London: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I., and Stengers, I. (1979). La nouvelle alliance. Métamorphose de la science. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Pugh, G. E. (1978). The Biological Origin of Human Values. London: Routledge and Kegan.Google Scholar
Radnitzky, G., ed. (in press). Unity of the Sciences. Vol. I. New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
Rindos, D. (1985). “Darwinian Selection, Symbolic Variation and the Evolution of Culture.” Current Anthropology 1: 65–88.Google Scholar
Rorty, A. O., ed. (1976). The Identities of Persons. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
de Rosnay, J. (1975). Le macroscope. Vers une vision globale. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Schubert, G. (1983). “The Evolution of Political Science: Paradigms of Physics, Biology and Politics.” Politics and the Life Sciences 2: 97–124. With commentaries.Google Scholar
Schubert, J. N. (1983). “Ethological Methods for Observing Small Group Political Decision Making.” Politics and the Life Sciences 1: 3–41. With commentaries.Google Scholar
Shorter, E. (1982). A History of Women's Body. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1979). Models of Thought. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, P. (1981). The Expanding Circle: Ethics and Sociobiology. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Google Scholar
Somit, A., ed. (1976). Biology and Politics: Recent Explorations. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Stent, G. S., ed. (1978). Morality as a Biological Phenomenon. Berlin: Springer Verlag International.Google Scholar
Thom, R. (1980). “Prédication et grammaire universelle.” Fundamenta Scientiae 1: 23–34.Google Scholar
Varela, F. J. (1979). Principles of Biological Autonomy. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. (1982). Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex among Apes. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Waddington, C. H. (1977). Tools for Thought. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Watzlawick, P. ed. (1984). The Invented Reality. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1983). Promethean Fire. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zeleny, M., ed. (1981). Autopoiesis. A Theory of Living Organization. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar