Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:49:03.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of language in expressing the life sciences in a polarized age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2017

Kathleen Hall Jamieson*
Affiliation:
Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania
*
Correspondence: Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvani. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Perspective
Copyright
© Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge: Prose and Verse (Philadelphia: Crissy & Markley, 1853), p. 254.Google Scholar
For further reading, see Kathleen Hall Jamieson, “The need for a science of science communication: Communicating science’s values and norms,” in The Oxford Handbook on the Science of Science Communication, eds. Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Dan Kahan, and Dietram A. Scheufele (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Bernadine Healy interview with Sharyl Attkisson, “The ‘open question’ on vaccines and autism,” CBS News, May 12, 2008, http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-open-question-on-vaccines-and-autism/, accessed May 16, 2017.Google Scholar
“Both sides breed confusion over GMOs,” Washington Post, October 31, 2013, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9f4_-eYfKQ, accessed May 16, 2017.Google Scholar
Dan Glickman interview for “Harvest of Fear,” PBS, October 2000, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/harvest/interviews/glickman.html, accessed May 16, 2017.Google Scholar
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, “Statement of policy: Foods derived from new plant varieties,” May 29, 1992, https://www.fda.gov/food/guidanceregulation/guidancedocumentsregulatoryinformation/biotechnology/ucm096095.htm, accessed May 16, 2017.Google Scholar
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, “FDA’s role in regulating safety of GE foods,” May 14, 2013, https://njfb.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/FDA-GE-Answers.pdf, accessed May 16, 2017.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Biotechnology frequently asked questions,” February 8, 2016, https://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?navid=AGRICULTURE&contentid=BiotechnologyFAQs.xml, accessed May 16, 2017.Google Scholar
Law Library of Congress, “Restrictions on genetically modified organisms: United States,” March 2014, https://www.loc.gov/law/help/restrictions-on-gmos/usa.php, accessed May 16, 2017.Google Scholar
Millstone, Erik, Brunner, Eric, and Mayer, Sue, “Beyond ‘substantial equivalence,” Nature , 7 October 1999, 401: 525526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission, A Decade of EU-Funded GMO Research (2001–2010) (Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2010), p. 16.Google Scholar
News report from United Kingdom, May 16, 1990, archived at https://sites.google.com/site/foodsafetypolicy//videos-on-mad-cow-disease, accessed May 16, 2017.Google Scholar
Brendan Carlin, political correspondent, PA News, October 13, 1998, archived at http://mad-cow.org/, accessed May 16, 2017.Google Scholar
Connor, Steve, “‘Medical chief ‘forced to say beef was safe,”’ The Independent, October 29, 1998.Google Scholar
Conner, 1998.Google Scholar
Lynch, Diahanna and Vogel, David, “The regulation of GMOs in Europe and the United States: A case-study of contemporary European regulatory politics,” Council on Foreign Relations, April 5, 2001, https://www.cfr.org/report/regulation-gmos-europe-and-united-states, accessed May 16, 2017.Google Scholar
Ansell, Christopher, Maxwell, Rahsaan, and Sicurelli, Daniela, “Protesting food: NGOs and political mobilization in Europe,” in What’s the Beef? The Contested Governance of European Food Safety, Ansell, Christopher and Vogel, David, eds. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006), p. 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, Matteo, Risk Perception, Culture, and Legal Change: A Comparative Study on Food Safety in the Wake of the Mad Cow Crisis (New York: Routledge, 2016), p. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Brian F. and Atkinson, Mary Layton, “Taxing death or estates? When frames influence citizens’ issue beliefs,” in Winning with Words: The Origins and Impacts of Political Framing, Schaffner, Brian F. and Sellers, Patrick J., eds. (New York: Routledge, 2010), pp. 121135.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M. and Carmines, Edward G., “Reaching beyond race,” PS: Political Science and Politics , 1997, 30(3): 466471.Google Scholar
Simon, Adam F. and Jerit, Jennifer, “Toward a theory relating political discourse, media, and public opinion,” Journal of Communication , 2007, 57(2): 254271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Julia M., Bednarczyk, Robert A., Richards, Jennifer L., Allen, Kristen E., Warraich, Gohar J., and Omer, Saad B., “Trends in personal belief exemption rates among alternative private schools: Waldorf, Montessori, and holistic kindergartens in California, 2000–2014,” American Journal of Public Health , 2017, 107(1): 108112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNutt, Louise-Anne, Desemone, Cristina, DeNicola, Erica, El Chebib, Hassan, Nadeau, Jessica A., Bednarczyk, Robert A., and Shaw, Jana, “Affluence as a predictor of vaccine refusal and underimmunization in California private kindergartens,” Vaccine , 2016, 34(14): 17331738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Outbreak of measles — San Diego, California, January–February 2008,” MMWR Weekly, February 22, 2008, https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm, accessed May 16, 2017.Google Scholar