Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:32:28.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reductionism, “Bad Science,” and Politics: A Critique of Anti-Reductionist Reasoning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Ullica Segerstråle
Ullica Segerstråle*
Affiliation:
Illinois Institute of Technology, USA
Get access

Abstract

This article examines the recent political-cumepistemological criticism of reductionism in fields such as sociobiology, behavioral ecology, behavioral genetics, and IQ research. It identifies and challenges some unexamined assumptions underlying current “anti-reductionist” reasoning, especially the belief that there are inherent links between political motivations and scientific convictions, between “bad” science and undesirable political consequences, and between methodological and ontological reductionism. The author analyzes the conflict in scientific world views between anti-reductionist “weeders” and reductionist “planters.” Paradoxically, in their criticism of research strategies routinely used by alleged reductionists, anti-reductionists often sound like arch-reductionists themselves. The author argues that the various linked beliefs in anti-reductionist reasoning should be uncoupled, not only for intellectual, but also for political reasons.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , August 1992 , pp. 199 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, E.et al.(1975). [Letter.] The New York Review of Books (November 13):43–44.Google Scholar
Alper, J.(1982). Book Review of The Legacy of Malthus. Science for the People (March-April):30–31.Google Scholar
Alper, J., Beckwith, J., and Miller, L.F.(1978). “Sociobiology Is a Political Issue.” In Caplan, A.L.(ed.), The Sociobiology Debate. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Bateson, P.P.G.(1981). “Sociobiology and Genetic Determinism.” Theoria to Theory 14:291–300.Google Scholar
Beckwith, J.(1981-82). “The Political Use of Sociobiology in the United States and Europe.” The Philosophical Forum 13(2-3):311–321.Google Scholar
Berman, M.(1981). The Reenchantment of the World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Block, N.J.and Dworkin, G., eds. (1976). The IQ Controversy. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Caplan, A.L.(1978). The Sociobiology Debate. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Chasin, B.(1977). “Sociobiology: A Sexist Synthesis.” Science for the People (May-June):27–31.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.(1975). Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Chorover, S.(1979). From Genesis to Genocide. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Davis, B.D.(1978). “The Moralistic Fallacy.” Nature 272:390.Google Scholar
Davis, B.D.(1985). Storm over Biology: Essays on Science, Sentiment, and Public Policy. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R.(1976). The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R.(1979). “Twelve Misunderstandings of Kin Selection.” Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie 51:184–200.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R.(1981a). “Selfish Genes in Race or Politics.” Nature 289:528.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R.(1981b). “In Defence of Selfish Genes.” Philosophy (October):56.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R.(1981c). The Extended Phenotype. Oxford: Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R.(1985). Review of Lewontin, Rose, and Kamin's Not in Our Genes. New Scientist (January 24):59–60.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T.(1968). “On Genetics and Politics.” Social Education (February): 142–146.Google Scholar
Gould, S.J.(1978). Ever Since Darwin. London: Burnett.Google Scholar
Gould, S.J.(1981). The Mismeasure of Man. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Gould, S.J.and Lewontin, R.D.(1979). “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 205:581–598.Google Scholar
Graham, L.R.(1977). “Political Ideology and Genetic Theory: Russia and Germany in the 1920s.” Hastings Center Report 7:30–39.Google Scholar
Howe, H.and Lyne, J.(1992). “Gene Talk in Sociobiology.” Social Epistemology 6:(in press).Google Scholar
Hull, D.L.(1974). Philosophy of Biology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hull, D.L.(1981). “Reduction and Genetics.” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6:125–143.Google Scholar
Jensen, A.R.(1969). “How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement?” Harvard Educational Review 39:1–123.Google Scholar
Jensen, A.R.(1979). Bias in Mental Testing. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, A.R.(1982). “The Debunking of Scientific Fossils and Strawpersons.” Contemporary Education Review 1:121–135.Google Scholar
Jensen, A.R.(1985). “The Nature of the Black-White Difference on Various Psychomotor Tests: Spearman's Hypothesis.” Behaviorial and Brain Sciences 8:193–263[with peer commentary].Google Scholar
Kamin, L.(1974). The Science and Politics of IQ. Potomac, MD: Laurence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P.(1985). Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P.(1987). Author's Precis of Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature [with peer commentary]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10:61–100.Google Scholar
Layzer, D.(1972). “Science or Superstition. A Physical Scientist Looks at the IQ Controversy.” Cognition 1:265–300.Google Scholar
Leeds, A.(1981-82). “The Language of Sociobiology.” The Philosophical Forum 13(2-3):161–206.Google Scholar
Levins, R.(1968). Evolution in Changing Environments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Levins, R.and Lewontin, R.C.(1976). “The Problem of Lysenkoism.” In Rose, H.and Rose, S.(eds.), The Radicalization of Science. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Levins, R.and Lewontin, R.C.(1980). “Dialectics and Reductionism in Ecology.” Synthese 43:47–78.Google Scholar
Levins, R.and Lewontin, R.C.(1985). The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C.(1970). “Race and Intelligence.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (March):2–8.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C.(1972a). “Testing the Theory of Natural Selection.” Nature 236:181–182.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C.(1972b). “The Apportionment of Human Diversity.” Evolutionary Biology 6:381–398.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C.(1974a). The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C.(1974b). “The Analysis of Variance and the Analysis of Causes.” American Journal of Human Genetics 26:400–411.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C.(1975a). “Genetic Aspects of Intelligence.” Annual Review of Genetics 9:387–405.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C.(1975b). Transcript of “NOVA” program, WGBH Boston, #211. Transmission by PBS, Feb. 2.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C.(1976). “Sociobiology—A Caricature of Darwinism.” In Suppe, F.and Asquith, P.(eds.), Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Volume Two, Symposia. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association: 22–31.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C.(1977). “Caricature of Darwinism.” Nature 266:283–284.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C.(1979). “Sociobiology as an Adaptationist Program.” Behavioral Science 24:5–14.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C.(1981a). “Sleight of Hand.” The Sciences (July-August):23–26.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C.(1981b). “The Inferiority Complex.” The New York Review of Books (October 22): 12–16.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C.(1981c). “Is Intelligence for Real? An Exchange.” The New York Review of Books (November 19).Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C.(1982). “Keeping it Clean.” Nature 300:113–114.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C.(1983). “The Corpse in the Elevator.” The New York Review of Books (January 20):29, 34-37.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R.C., Rose, S., and Kamin, L.(1984). Not in Our Genes. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Lumsden, C.L.and Wilson, E.O.(1981a). Genes, Mind, and Culture: The Coevolutionary Process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lumsden, C.L.and Wilson, E.O.(1981b). “Genes, Mind and Ideology.” The Sciences (November):6–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luria, S.E.(1974). “What Can Biologists Solve?” The New York Review of Books (February 7):22–28.Google Scholar
Luria, S.E., Gould, S.J., and Singer, S.(1981). A View of Life. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R.H.and Wilson, E.O.(1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H.(1955). Eros and Civilization. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Masters, R.D.(1982). “Is Sociobiology Reactionary? The Political Implications of Inclusive-Fitness Theory.” Quarterly Review of Biology 57:275–92.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J.(1981). “Genes and Race.” Nature 289:742.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J.(1982). “Genes and Memes.” London Review of Books (February 4-18):3–4.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J.(1986). “Molecules Are Not Enough.” The London Review of Books (February 6):8–9.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J.and Warren, N.(1982). “Models of Cultural and Genetic Change.” Evolution 36:620–627.Google Scholar
Medawar, P.(1977). “Unnatural Science.” The New York Review of Books (February 3): 13–18.Google Scholar
Medawar, P.(1981). “Stretch Genes.” The New York Review of Books (July 16):45–48.Google Scholar
Medawar, P.and Medawar, J.(1983). From Aristotle to Zoos: A Philosophical Dictionary of Biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Midgley, M.(1978). Beast and Man. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Midgley, M.(1980). “Gene-Juggling.” In Montagu, A.(ed.), Sociobiology Examined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pastore, N.(1949). The Nature-Nurture Controversy. New York: Columbia University King's Crown Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M.(1968). “Life's Irreducible Structure.” Science 160:1308–1312.Google Scholar
Ravitch, D.(1982). “IQ.” Commentary, February: 66–70.Google Scholar
Rogers, J.A.(1988). “Russia: Social Sciences.” In Glick, T.(ed.), The Comparative Reception of Darwinism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rose, H.and Rose, S.(1982). “On Oppositions to Reductionism.” In Rose, S.(ed.), Against Biological Determinism. London: Allison and Busby.Google Scholar
Rose, S.(1981). “Genes and Race.” Nature 289:335.Google Scholar
Rose, S., ed. (1982a). Against Biological Determinism. London: Allison and Busby.Google Scholar
Rose, S., ed. (1982b). Toward a Liberatory Biology. London: Allison and Busby.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A.(1987). “Is there Really ‘Juggling,’ ‘Artifice,’ and ‘Trickery’ in Genes, Mind, and Culture?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10:80–82.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, M.(1977). “Sociobiology: Laying the Foundation of a Racist Synthesis.” Harvard Crimson (February 8).Google Scholar
Ruse, M.(1979, 1985). Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense? (First and Second Editions). Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.Google Scholar
Samelson, F.(1982). “Intelligence of Man.” Science 215:656–657.Google Scholar
Segerstråle, U.(1983). “Whose Truth Shall Prevail? Moral and Scientific Interests in the Sociobiology Controversy.” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Sociology, Harvard University (available from University Microfilms, Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
Segerstråle, U.(1986). “Colleagues in Conflict: An ‘In Vivo’ Analysis of the Sociobiology Controversy.” Biology and Philosophy 1:53–87.Google Scholar
Segerstråle, U.(1987). “Scientific Controversy as Moral-Political Discourse.” Contemporary Sociology 16:544–547.Google Scholar
Segerstråle, U.(1989). “The (Re)Colonization of Science by the Life-World: Problems and Prospects.” In Haferkamp, H.(ed.), Social Structure and Culture. New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Segerstråle, U.(1990a). “The Sociobiology of Conflict and the Conflict about Sociobiology.” In van der Dennen, J.and Falger, V.(eds.), Sociobiology and Conflict: Evolutionary Perspectives on Competition, Cooperation, Violence, and Warfare. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Segerstråle, U.(1990b). “Negotiating ‘Sound Science’: Expert Disagreement about Release of Genetically Engineered Organisms.” Politics and the Life Sciences 8:221–31.Google Scholar
Segerstråle, U.(1990c). “Social Taboos and the Distortion Of Academic Discourse: A Meta-Critique of Critical Reasoning.” In Elzinga, A., Nolin, J., Pranger, R., and Sunesson, S.(eds.), In Science We Trust? Moral and Political Issues in Science and Society. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Segerstråle, U.(1990d). “Scouting for Fraud and Error: A New Form of Scientific Work?” Presented at the XII International Congress of Sociology, Madrid. [Abstract in Sociological Abstracts, Dec. 1990. Paper available from ISA.]Google Scholar
Segerstråle, U.(1992). “Doctor, Cure Thyself.” [peer commentary]. Social Epistemology 6:(in press).Google Scholar
Simberloff, D.(1980a). “A Succession of Paradigms in Ecology: Essentialism to Materialism and Probabilism.” Synthese 43:339.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D.(1980b). “Reply.” Synthese 43:79–93.Google Scholar
Sociobiology Study Group of Science for the People (1976). “Sociobiology—Another Biological Determinism.” BioScience 26(3):182, 184-186.Google Scholar
Thoday, J.M.(1981). “Probity in Science: The Case of Cyril Burt.” Nature 291:517.Google Scholar
van den Berghe, P.L.(1981). “Sociobiology: Several Views.” BioScience 31:406.Google Scholar
Werskey, P.G.(1978). The Visible College: A Study of Left-Wing Scientists in Britain, 1918-1939. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O.(1971a). The Insect Societies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O.(1971b). “The Prospects for a Unified Sociobiology.” American Scientist 59:400–403.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O.(1975a). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O.(1975b). “For Sociobiology.” New York Review of Books (December 11):20, 60-61.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O.(1976). “Academic Vigilantism and the Political Significance of Sociobiology.” BioScience 26:183–190.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O.(1977). “The Social Instinct.” Bulletin of the American Academy for Arts and Sciences 30 (1): 11–25.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O.(1981). “Genes and Racism.” Nature 289:627.Google Scholar