Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:34:58.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

If Risk Assessment isn't Only Science, Must it Also be Politics?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Richard J. Tobin*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles and Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Nor are body counts necessarily mandates for action. As a result of data obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, the Public Citizen Health Research Group disclosed in early 1985 that the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has long known about nearly 250 work sites whose 250,000 workers face an increased risk of cancer. Although NIOSH's officials believed that many workers could benefit by early detection, the agency had failed to notify anyone (Perl, , 1985: A1, A12).Google Scholar

2. A related issue focuses on which party has the burden of proof. Current rules normally assign this burden to victims and to those who favor remedial action (i.e., innocent until proven guilty). Hardin, Garrett (1973) advocates just the opposite—guilty until proven innocent, thus placing the burden of proof on those who wish to introduce a new chemical or product to the environment.Google Scholar