Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:21:25.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Human Genome Diversity Project: Ethical Problems and Solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

David B. Resnik
David B. Resnik*
Affiliation:
East Carolina University, USA
Get access

Abstract

The goal of the Human Genome Diversity Project (HGDP) is to provide a comprehensive study of genetic diversity across different human populations. Scientists working on the HGDP plan to collect samples from all 400 to 500 geographically isolated or culturally unique human populations that desire to participate in the project. Few people have questioned the scientific merits of the HGDP and its potential contribution to our understanding of human genetics, but the project has created a storm of moral, cultural, and political controversy during its brief existence. Opponents have argued that the HGDP smacks of racism, commercialism, exploitation, and cultural imperialism. Critics have also found fault with the informed consent process proposed by organizers of the HGDP. Opposition to the HGDP has succeeded in impeding (but not derailing) this project. The essay explores some of the key moral, political, and cultural issues raised by the HGDP and argues that the project should be implemented and should be funded, provided that researchers and organizers take steps to address the issues it raises.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 1999 , pp. 15 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Anthropological Association (1997). Code of Ethics of the American Anthropological Association (Final Draft, March 1, 1997).Google Scholar
Ayala, F. (1982). Population and Evolutionary Genetics. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings.Google Scholar
Beckwith, J. (1997). “The Responsibility of Scientists in the Genetics and Race Controversies.” In Smith, E. and Sapp, W., (eds.), Plain Talk about the Human Genome Project. Tuskegee, AL: Tuskegee University.Google Scholar
Bhat, A. (1996). “The National Institutes of Health and the Papua New Guinea Cell Line.” Cultural Survival Quarterly 20 (2):29–31.Google Scholar
Brody, B. (1998). The Ethics of Biomedical Research: An International Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavilli-Sforza, L. et al. (1991). “Call for a Worldwide Survey of Human Genetic Diversity: A Vanishing Opportunity for the Human Genome Project.” Genomics 11:490.Google Scholar
Collins, F. et al. (1998). “New Goals for the U.S. Human Genome Project: 1998–2003.” Science 282:682–99.Google Scholar
Committee on the Conduct of Science (1995). On Being a Scientist. Second edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Council for International Organization of Medical Sciences (1993). International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects.Google Scholar
Crigger, B. (1995). “The Vampire Project.” Hastings Center Report 25(1):2.Google Scholar
Dukepoo, F. (1998). “Commentary on ‘F. Jackson’: An American Indian Perspective.” Science and Engineering Ethics 4:171–88.Google Scholar
Gostin, L. (1995). “Cultural Sensitivity, Informed Consent, and Respect for Persons.” Journal of the American Medical Association 274:844–44.Google Scholar
Greely, H. (1998). “The Human Genome Diversity Project: Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues.” In Peters, T., (ed.), Genetics: Issues of Social Justice. Cleveland, OH: The Pilgrim Press.Google Scholar
Harry, D. (1994). “The Human Genome Project: Implications for Indigenous Peoples.” Abya Yala News 8 (4):1–2.Google Scholar
Herrnstein, R. and Murray, C. (1994). The Bell Curve. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Ibeji, Y. and Gane, K. (1996). “The Hagahai Patent Controversy in Their Own Words” Petty, A. and deKoninck, V. (trans.). Cultural Survival Quarterly 20 (2):33.Google Scholar
Jackson, F. (1998). “Scientific Limitations and Ramifications of a Non-Representative Human Genome Project: African American Response.” Science and Engineering Ethics 4:155–77.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. and Bhattacharyya, G. (1985). Statistics: Principles and Methods. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Juengst, E. (1998). “Groups as Gatekeepers to Genomic Research: Conceptually Confusing, Morally Hazardous, and Practically Useless.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (2):183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, P. (1994). “Genetic Diversity Project Tries Again.” Science 266:720.Google Scholar
Kidd, J., Kidd, K., and Weiss, K. (1993). “The Human Genome Diversity Initiative.” Human Biology 65 (1):1–8.Google Scholar
King, P. (1992). “The Dangers of Difference.” Hastings Center Report 22 (2):35–38.Google Scholar
King, P. (1998). “Race, Justice, and Research.” In Kahn, J., Mastroianni, A., and Sugarman, J., (eds.), Beyond Consent: Seeking Justice in Research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, M. (1994). “Interrogating the Human Genome Diversity Project.” Social Science and Medicine 39 (5):603–606.Google Scholar
Looney, B. (1994). “Should Genes Be Patented?” Law and Policy in International Business 26 (1):231–77.Google Scholar
Marshall, E. (1994). “NIH Told to Reconsider Crime Meeting.” Science 262:23.Google Scholar
Mead, M. (1996). “Genealogy, Sacredness, and the Commodities Market.” Cultural Survival Quarterly 20 (2):46–53.Google Scholar
National Research Council, Committee on Human Genome Diversity (1997). The Human Genome Diversity Project. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Nelkin, D. and Andrews, L. (1998). “Homo Economicus: Commercialization of Body Tissue in the Age of Biotechnology.” Hastings Center Report 28 (5):30–39.Google Scholar
North American Regional Committee, Human Genome Diversity Project (1997). “Model Ethical Protocol for Collecting DNA.” Houston Law Review 33:1431–73.Google Scholar
Osborne, W. (1993). “The Ethical Symbiosis between the Anthropologists and the People They Study.” Anthropology Newsletter 34 (9): 1, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennisi, E. (1997). “NRC OKs Long-Delayed Survey of Human Genome Diversity.” Science 278:568–66.Google Scholar
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Biomedicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1982). Making Health Care Decisions, Volume 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Resnik, D. (1997). “The Morality of Human Gene Patents.” Kennedy Institute for Ethics Journal 7 (1):43–61.Google Scholar
Resnik, D. (1998a). “The Ethics of HIV Research in Developing Countries.” Bioethics 12:286–306.Google Scholar
Resnik, D. (1998b). The Ethics of Science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rifkin, J. (1998). The Biotech Century. New York: Penguin Putnam.Google Scholar
Sertjeantson, S. (1994). “The Human Genome Diversity Project: Fact versus Fiction.” Search 25 (3):85–88.Google Scholar
Weiss, K. (1996). “Biological Diversity Is Inherent in Humanity.” Cultural Survival Quarterly 20 (2):26–29.Google Scholar
Wertz, D. (1996). “The Human Genome Diversity Project.” The Gene Letter 1 (3):1–3.Google Scholar
World Medical Association (1996). Declaration of Helsinki.Google Scholar