No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Edward O. Wilson, The Social Conquest of Earth (New York: Liveright Publishing/W. W. Norton and Company, 2012), 352 pages. ISBN 978-0871404138. Hardcover $27.95.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 January 2016
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences
References
1. Settle, James E., Dawes, Christopher T., Christakis, Nicholas A., and Fowler, James H., “Friendships moderate an association between a dopamine gene variant and political ideology,” Journal of Politics 2010, 72(4): 1189–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Charney, Evan and English, William, “Candidate genes and political behavior,” American Political Science Review 2012, 10(1): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Hatemi, Peter L. and McDermott, Rose, “The genetics of politics: Discovery, challenges, and progress,” Trends in Genetics 2012, 28(10): 525–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Schreiber, Darren, Fonzo, Greg, and Simmons, Alan N. et al., “Red brain, blue brain: Evaluative processes differ in Democrats and Republicans,” PLos ONE 2013, 8(2): e52970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. “The neurobiology of political violence: New tools, new insight,” A strategic multilayer assessment workshop hosted by the National Institutes of Health, United States Strategic Command, Joint Staff, and Office of the Secretary of Defense, December 1–2, 2010, http://www.nsiteam.com/pubs/; “National security challenges: Insights from social, neurobiological, and complexity sciences,” White paper, U.S. Department of Defense, July 2012, http://www.nsiteam.com/pubs/.Google Scholar
6. Trivers, Robert L., “The evolution of reciprocal altruism,” Quarterly Review of Biology 1971, 46(1): 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Burnham, Terence C. and Johnson, Dominic D. P., “The biological and evolutionary logic of human cooperation,” Analyse & Kritik 2005, 27: 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar