Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:16:55.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Culture, Social Minds, and Governance in Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Claude S. Phillips*
Affiliation:
Western Michigan University, USA
*
Correspondence should be addressed to 518 Phoenix Street, South Haven, MI 49090, USA (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access

Abstract

In the past quarter century, the concept of culture has undergone change as evolutionary scientists have come to include social behavior in their purview. Evolutionary psychology is the newest field to concern itself with culture by claiming that most specific human behaviors are generated by minds specifically designed for these behaviors—and not from a general-purpose mind—as a result of adaptations made during the Pleistocene. Thus, mental behaviors are explained as having formed independently of cultural learning. In defending the concept, however, the leading proponents practically slough off culture as significant in human affairs. I argue that they have neglected the powerful explanatory statement of Darwin regarding at least one general-purpose adaptation of social animals, namely, the instinct for sociability, a position supported by recent neurological studies. Expanding the Darwinian concept, modern research shows that (1) the human brain was selected for sociability, which explains the origin and strength of culture, as well as its variability; (2) the development of complex culture in a pre-human primate initiated the two-and-one-half million-year evolution to modern humans; and (3) there are political contributions to cultural evolution that rest on the nature of groups (competitive and cooperative).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R. (1987). The Biology of Moral Systems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. and Hamilton, W.D. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Barkow, J.H. (1992). “Beneath New Culture is Old Psychology: Gossip and Social Stratification.” In Barkow, J.H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (eds.), The Adapted Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barkow, J.H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J., eds. (1992). The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betzig, L.L. (1986). Despotism and Differential Reproduction: A Darwinian View of History. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
Bonner, J.T. (1980). The Evolution of Culture in Animals. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. (1985). Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brodie, R. (1996). Virus of the Mind. Seattle: Integral Press.Google Scholar
Brothers, L. (1997). Friday's Footprint: How Society Shapes the Human Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caldwell, L K. (1964). “Biopolitics: Science, Ethics, and Public Policy.” The Yale Review 54, 1:116.Google Scholar
Campbell, B.G. (1985). Human Evolution: An Introduction to Man's Adaptations. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
Campbell, D.T. (1994). “How Individual and Face-to-Face-Group Selection Undermine Firm Selection in Organizational Evolution.” In Baum, J.A.C. and Singh, J.V. (eds.), Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Corning, P.A. (1983). The Synergism Hypothesis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Corning, P.A. (1997). “Holistic Darwinism: ‘Synergistic Selection’ and the Evolutionary Process.” Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems 20:363400.Google Scholar
Cory, G.A. Jr. (1999). The Reciprocal Modular Brain in Economics and Politics. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (1992). “Cognitive Adaptations for Social Change.” In Barkow, J.H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (eds.), The Adapted Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1874). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Second Edition. New York: Hurst.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deacon, T.W. (1997). The Symbolic Species. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Degler, C.N. (1991). In Search of Human Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D.C. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Dewan, E.M. (1976). “Consciousness as an Emergent Causal Agent in the Context of Control System Theory.” In Globus, G.G., Maxwell, G., and Savodnik, I. (eds.), Consciousness and the Brain. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (1986). How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Durham, W.H. (1991). Coevolution: Genes, Culture, and Human Diversity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Easton, D. (1990). The Analysis of Political Structure. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franks, N. R. (1989). “Army Ants: A Collective Intelligence.” American Scientist 77:139145.Google Scholar
Geary, D.C. (1998). Male, Female: The Evolution of Human Sex Differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M.T. (1993). Review of W. Durham, Coevolution: Genes, Culture, and Human Diversity. Politics and the Life Sciences 12:123–24.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M.T. (1997). Metaphysics and the Origin of Species. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Harris, M. (1977). Cannibals and Kings: The Origins of Cultures. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S.B. (1981). The Woman That Never Evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, G.R. (1995). “The Evolutionary Origins of Government and Politics.” In Somit, A. and Losco, J. (eds.), Human Nature and Politics. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Leakey, R.E. and Lewin, R. (1992). Origins Reconsidered: In Search of What Makes Us Human. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Low, B.S. (1993). “An Evolutionary Perspective on War.” In Zimmerman, W. and Jacobson, H.K. (eds.), Behavior, Culture, and Conflict in World Politics. Ann Arbor, Ml: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lumsden, C. J. and Wilson, E.O. (1981). Genes, Mind, and Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mazrui, A. (1975). Soldiers and Kinsmen in Uganda. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mills, C.W. (1960). Images of Man: The Classic Tradition in Sociological Thinking. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Monroe, K.R. (1994). “A Fat Lady in a Corset: Altruism and Social Theory.” American Journal of Political Science 38:861–93.Google Scholar
Peres, Y. and Hopp, M. (1990). “Loyalty and Aggression in Human Groups.” In van der Dennen, J. and Falger, V. (eds.), Sociobiology and Conflict. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1997). How the Mind Works. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. and Bloom, P. (1992). “Natural Language and Natural Selection.” In Barkow, J.H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (eds.), The Adapted Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ridley, M. (1997). The Origins of Virtue: Human Instincts and the Evolution of Culture. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Ross, R. and Van Den Haag, E. (1957). The Fabric of Society: An Introduction to the Social Sciences. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Seeley, T.D., and Levien, R.A. (1987). “A Colony of Mind: The Beehive as Thinking Machine.” The Sciences 27, 4:3843.Google Scholar
Shaw, R.P. and Wong, Y. (1989). The Genetic Seeds of Warfare. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Somit, A. (1968). “Toward a More Biologically-Oriented Political Science: Ethology and Psychopharmacology.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 12:550–67.Google Scholar
Symons, D. (1979). The Evolution of Human Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Symons, D. (1992). “On the Use and Misuse of Darwinism in the Study of Human Behavior.” In Barkow, J.H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (eds.), The Adapted Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thorson, T.L. (1970). Biopolitics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Tooby, J. and Cosmides, L. (1992). “The Psychological Foundations of Culture.” In Barkow, J.H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (eds.), The Adapted Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. and Lanting, F. (1997). Bonobo: The Forgotten Ape. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Warnecke, A.M., Masters, R., and Kempter, G. (1992). “The Roots of Nationalism: Nonverbal Behavior and Xenophobia.” Ethology and Sociobiology 13:267–82.Google Scholar
Wiegele, T.C. (1979). Biopolitics: Search for a More Human Political Science. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Wilson, D.S. and Sober, E. (1994). “Re-Introducing Group Selection to the Human Behavioral Sciences.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17:585654.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. (1978). On Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. (1998). Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Wilson, J.Q. (1993). The Moral Sense. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. and Daly, M. (1992). “The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Chattel.” In Barkow, J.H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (eds.), The Adapted Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
“World Population Data Sheet” (1997). Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
Wright, R. (1994). The Moral Animal: Evolutionary Psychology and Everyday Life. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1953). “Genes and Organism.” American Naturalist 87:518.Google Scholar