Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:31:55.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commentary on “Human Nature and Political Theory”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Jean Bethke Elshtain
Jean Bethke Elshtain*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01002
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles and Commentaries
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , February 1984 , pp. 129 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. I disagree with Masters that Hobbes and Rousseau held basically identical views on the subject of human nature. The interested reader can turn to my discussion inPublic Man, Private Woman: Women in Social and Political Thought (Princeton, 1981) for a more complete unpacking of the human nature question in Hobbes and Rousseau, respectively.Google Scholar

2. It is, after all, the five hundredth anniversary of the birth of Martin Luther so we may as well nail our theses to various walls. It is one effective way to get a rowdy debate going.Google Scholar