Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:31:08.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The American Abortion Controversy: Lessons from Cross-National Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Neil Nevitte ,
William P. Brandon  and
Lori Davis
Neil Nevitte*
Affiliation:
University of Calgary, Canada
William P. Brandon
Affiliation:
Seton Hall University, USA
Lori Davis
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Canada
*
Dr. Nevitte at the Department of Political Science, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, N.W., Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.
Get access

Abstract

Analyses of American public opinion about abortion rarely consider what light other cases might shed on the U.S. controversy. This paper argues that there are striking parallels between the politics of abortion in the U.S. and Canada. These parallels extend beyond courts and interest groups; they also apply to public opinion. Gallup data indicate aggregate similarities in how both publics view the legalization of abortion in the last fifteen years, and World Values Survey data show that Americans and Canadians hold similar views about abortion even when the controversy is lifted out of its legal context. Probit analysis demonstrates that the same variables similarly predict where these publics stand on abortion when health and discretionary aspects of the debate are taken into account. Postmaterialist value orientations may provide important clues about what future direction the abortion debate in the U.S. may take.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , February 1993 , pp. 19 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bolce, L. (1988). “Abortion and Presidential Elections: The Impact of Public Perceptions of Party and Candidate Positions.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 18:815–29.Google Scholar
Bozinoff, L. and Macintosh, P. (1990) “Canadians Remain Divided Concerning Abortion Question.” The Gallup Report. Oct. 15:2.Google Scholar
Combs, M. and Welch, S. (1982). “Blacks, Whites, and Attitudes Toward Abortion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 46(4):510–20.Google Scholar
Conover, P.J. and Gray, V. (1983). Feminism and the New Right: Conflict over the American Family. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. (1988). Citizen Politics in Western Democracies. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Evers, M. and McGee, J. (1980) “The Trends and Pattern in Attitudes Toward Abortion in the United States, 1965-1977.” Social Indicators Research 7:251–267.Google Scholar
Franklin, C.H. and Kosaki, L.C. (1989). “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review 83(3):751–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granberg, D. (1987). “The Abortion Issue in the 1984 Elections.” Family Planning Perspectives 19(2):59–62.Google Scholar
Granberg, D. and Granberg, B.W. (1980). “Abortion Attitudes, 1965-1980: Trends and Determinants.” Family Planning Perspectives 12(5):250–61.Google Scholar
Hall, E.J. and Ferree, M.M. (1986). “Race Differences in Abortion Attitudes.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50:193–207.Google Scholar
Hugick, L. and Hueber, G. (1991). “Two-thirds Oppose Supreme Court's Latest Abortion Ruling.” The Gallup Poll News Service 56(6).Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1981). “Post-Materialism in an Environment of Insecurity.” American Political Science Review 75:880–900.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1990). Cultural Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. and Flanagan, S.C. (1987). “Value Change in Industrial Societies.” American Political Science Review 81:251–67.Google Scholar
Legge, J.S. Jr. (1987). “Abortion as a Policy Issue: Attitudes of the Mass Public.” Women & Politics 7(1):63–83.Google Scholar
Lipset, S.M. (1990). Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada. Toronto, ON and Washington, DC: The C.D. Howe Institute and the National Planning Association.Google Scholar
Morgentaler v. The Queen (1988). 1 S.C.C. 30.Google Scholar
Nevitte, N., Bakvis, H., and Gibbins, R. (1989). “The Ideological Contours of ‘New Politics’ in Canada: Policy, Mobilization and Partisan Support.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 22:475–503.Google Scholar
Nevitte, N., Inglehart, R., and Basanez, M. (1991). “Direction of Value Change in North America: The Survey Evidence.” Paper delivered to the Conference Facing North/Facing South. Calgary, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
Newport, F. and McAneny, L. (1992). “Whose Court Is It Anyhow?: O'Connor Kennedy, Souter Position Reflects Abortion Views of Most Americans.” Gallup Poll Monthly 322:51–53.Google Scholar
Niemi, R.G., Mueller, J., and Smith, T.W. (1989). Trends in Public Opinion: A Compendium of Survey Data. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992). 112 S. Ct. 2791.Google Scholar
Roe v. Wade (1973). 410 U.S. 113.Google Scholar
Sackett, V.A. (1985). “Between Pro-Life and Pro-Choice.” Public Opinion 8:53–5.Google Scholar
Scott, J. and Schuman, H. (1988). “Attitude Strength and Social Action in the Abortion Dispute.” American Sociological Review 53:785–93.Google Scholar
Tedrow, L.M. and Mahoney, E.R. (1979). “Trends in Attitudes Toward Abortion: 1972-1976.” Public Opinion Quarterly 43:181–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toner, R. (1990). “G.O.P. Blurs Focus on Abortion, to Dismay of Some Party Faithful.” New York Times. January 18:A1, B6.Google Scholar
Webster v. Reproductive Services (1989). 109 S. Ct. 3040.Google Scholar