Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:25:23.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Validating Protestant Denominational Classifications Using the Chaves Inerrancy Scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2011

John Frendreis  and
Raymond Tatalovich
John Frendreis*
Affiliation:
Loyola University, Chicago
Raymond Tatalovich*
Affiliation:
Loyola University, Chicago
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: John Frendreis or Raymond Tatalovich, Loyola University, 1023 West Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL 60660. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: John Frendreis or Raymond Tatalovich, Loyola University, 1023 West Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL 60660. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We validate the classification of 16 “mainline” and 97 “evangelical” Protestant denominations in Religious Congregations and Membership in the United States, 2000 based on Mark Chaves' five-point Biblical “inerrancy” scale. Using Glenmary county data, nearly perfect correlations were derived between the percentage of adherents in “evangelical” denominations and levels three-four on the Chaves scale and between the percentage of adherents in “mainline” denominations and level 1 on the Chaves scale. The distinguishing characteristic of Evangelical or Mainline Protestant denominations, therefore, is Biblical inerrancy or its absence. As a guide for future empirical research, this comprehensive listing of Evangelical and Mainline Protestant denominations should be employed in aggregate studies, especially where county-level analysis is applied to one state or a subset of states.

Type
Research Note
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , August 2011 , pp. 355 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Camobreco, John F., and Barnello, Michelle A.. 2008. “Democratic Responsiveness and Policy Shock: The Case of State Abortion Policy.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 8:48–65.Google Scholar
Chaves, Mark. 1997. Ordaining Women: Culture and Conflict in Religious Organizations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Nancy J., and Robinson, Robert V.. 1996. “Are the Rumors of Wars Exaggerated? Religious Orthodoxy and Moral Progressivism in America.” American Journal of Sociology 102:756–787.Google Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P. 2002. “Regulating Hate: State and Local Influences on Hate Crime Law Enforcement.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2:126–160.Google Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Meier, Kenneth J.. 1996. “The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of the Conflict.” Journal of Politics 58:332–349.Google Scholar
Hunter, James Davison. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Jelen, Ted G. 1989. “Biblical Literalism and Inerrancy: Does the Difference Make a Difference?” Sociological Analysis 49:421–429.Google Scholar
Jones, Dale E., Doty, Sherri, Grammich, Clifford, Horsch, James E., Houseal, Richard, Lynn, Mac, Marcum, John P., Sanchagrin, Kenneth M., and Taylor, Richard H.. 2002. Religious Congregations and Membership in the United States 2000. Nashville, TN: Glenmary Research Center.Google Scholar
Kellstedt, Lyman A., and Noll, Mark A.. 1990. “Religion, Voting for President, and Party Identification, 1948–1984.” In Religion and American Politics, ed. Noll, , Mark, A.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey. 2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Leege, David C., and Kellstedt, Lyman A.. 1993. Rediscovering the Religious Factor in American Politics. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Lindner, Eileen W. ed. 2006. Yearbook of American and Canadian Churches 2006. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.Google Scholar
Mead, Frank S., and Hill, Samuel S.. 2001. Handbook of Denominations in the United States. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and Johnson, Cathy M.. 1990. “The Politics of Demon Rum: Regulating Alcohol and Its Deleterious Consequences.” American Politics Quarterly 18:404–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and McFarlane, Deborah R.. 1993. “The Politics of Funding Abortions: State Responses to the Political Environment.” American Politics Quarterly. 21:81–101.Google Scholar
Melton, J. Gordon. 2009. Melton's Encyclopedia of American Religions. Detroit, MI: Gale Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z., and Lee, Mei-Hsien. 1995. “Legislating Morality in the American States: The Case of Pre-Roe Abortion Regulation Reform.” American Journal of Political Science 39:599–627.Google Scholar
Morgan, David R., and Meier, Kenneth J.. 1980. “Politics and Morality: The Effect of Religion on Referenda Voting.” Social Science Quarterly 61:144–148.Google Scholar
Pierce, Patrick A., and Miller, Donald E.. 2001. “Variations in the Diffusion of State Lottery Adoptions: How Revenue Dedication Changes Morality Politics. In The Public Clash of Private Values, ed. Mooney, , Christopher, Z.New York, NY: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
Roh, Jongho and Berry, Frances S.. 2008. “Modeling the Outcomes of State Abortion Funding Referenda: Morality or Redistributive Policy, or Both?” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 8:66–87.Google Scholar
Roh, Jongho, and Haider-Markel, Donald P.. 2003. “All Politics is Not Local: National Forces in State Abortion Initiatives.” Social Science Quarterly 84:15–31.Google Scholar
Smith, Tom W. 1990. “Classifying Protestant Denominations.” Review of Religious Research 31:225–245.Google Scholar
Steensland, Brian, Park, Jerry Z., Regnerus, Mark D., Robinson, Lynn D., Wilcox, W. Bradford, and Woodberry, Robert D.. 2000. “The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art.” Social Forces 79:291–318.Google Scholar
Williams, Rhys H. 1997. Cultural Wars in American Politics. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 1988. The Restructuring of American Religion: Society and Faith since World War II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar