Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:30:59.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strange Bedfellows? Attitudes toward Minority and Majority Religious Symbols in the Public Sphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2018

Antoine Bilodeau ,
Luc Turgeon ,
Stephen White  and
Ailsa Henderson
Antoine Bilodeau*
Affiliation:
Concordia University
Luc Turgeon*
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Stephen White*
Affiliation:
Carleton University
Ailsa Henderson*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Antoine Bilodeau, Department of Political Science, Concordia University, Henry F. Hall, 1455 De Maisonneuve West, Montreal H3 G 1M8, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]; or to: Luc Turgeon, School of Political Studies, University of Ottawa, Social Sciences Building, 120 University, Ottawa K1N 6N5, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]; or to: Stephen White, Department of Political Science, Carleton University, B640 Loeb Building, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa K1S 5B6, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]; or to: Ailsa Henderson, Department of Political Science, University of Edinburgh, 3.09 Chrystal Macmillan Building, 15a George Square, Edinburgh EH 9LD, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected].
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Antoine Bilodeau, Department of Political Science, Concordia University, Henry F. Hall, 1455 De Maisonneuve West, Montreal H3 G 1M8, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]; or to: Luc Turgeon, School of Political Studies, University of Ottawa, Social Sciences Building, 120 University, Ottawa K1N 6N5, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]; or to: Stephen White, Department of Political Science, Carleton University, B640 Loeb Building, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa K1S 5B6, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]; or to: Ailsa Henderson, Department of Political Science, University of Edinburgh, 3.09 Chrystal Macmillan Building, 15a George Square, Edinburgh EH 9LD, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected].
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Antoine Bilodeau, Department of Political Science, Concordia University, Henry F. Hall, 1455 De Maisonneuve West, Montreal H3 G 1M8, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]; or to: Luc Turgeon, School of Political Studies, University of Ottawa, Social Sciences Building, 120 University, Ottawa K1N 6N5, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]; or to: Stephen White, Department of Political Science, Carleton University, B640 Loeb Building, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa K1S 5B6, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]; or to: Ailsa Henderson, Department of Political Science, University of Edinburgh, 3.09 Chrystal Macmillan Building, 15a George Square, Edinburgh EH 9LD, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected].
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Antoine Bilodeau, Department of Political Science, Concordia University, Henry F. Hall, 1455 De Maisonneuve West, Montreal H3 G 1M8, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]; or to: Luc Turgeon, School of Political Studies, University of Ottawa, Social Sciences Building, 120 University, Ottawa K1N 6N5, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]; or to: Stephen White, Department of Political Science, Carleton University, B640 Loeb Building, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa K1S 5B6, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]; or to: Ailsa Henderson, Department of Political Science, University of Edinburgh, 3.09 Chrystal Macmillan Building, 15a George Square, Edinburgh EH 9LD, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, we contend that distinguishing individuals who support bans on minority religious symbols from those who want to ban all religious symbols improves our understanding of the roots of opposition to minority religious symbols in the public sphere. We hypothesize that both groups are likely driven by markedly different motivations and that opposition to the presence of minority religious symbols in the public sphere may be the result of an alliance between “strange bedfellows,” clusters of individuals whose political outlooks usually bring them to opposite sides of political debates. Drawing on a survey conducted in the province of Quebec (Canada), we find that while holding liberal values and low religiosity are key characteristics of those who would ban all religious symbols, feelings of cultural threat and generalized prejudice are central characteristics of those who would only restrict minority religious symbols. Negative attitudes specifically toward Muslims, however, also appear to motivate both groups.

Type
Article
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 309 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We want to acknowledge the financial support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. The survey used in this study was made possible thanks to the financial support of the following organizations: the Secrétariat aux affaires intergouvernementales canadiennes of the Quebec government, the Institute for Research on Public Policy, the Canadian Network for Research on Terrorism, Security and Society, the Chaire de recherche canadienne en études québéboises et canadiennes de l'Université du Québec à Montréal, and Concordia University. The authors remain solely responsible for the interpretation of the data.

References

REFERENCES

Akkerman, Tjiske, and Hagelund, Anniken. 2007. “Women and Children First! Anti-Immigration Parties and Gender in Norway and the Netherlands.” Patterns of Prejudice 41:197–214.Google Scholar
Antonius, Rachad. 2008. “La représentation des Arabes et des Musulmans dans la grande presse écrite au Québec (The Representation of Arabs and Muslims in Written Media in Quebec).” www.ieim.uqam.ca/IMG/pdf/Arabes_Musulmans_Presse_ecrite_2.pdf (Accessed on January 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Beard, T. Randolph, Ekelund, Robert B., Ford, George S., Gaskins, Ben, and Tollison, Robert D.. 2013. “Secularism, Religion, and Political Choice in the United States.” Politics and Religion 6:753–777.Google Scholar
Bibby, Reginald W. 2008. “La religion à la carte. Un problème d'offre, de demande, ou des deux? (Religion à la carte. A Problem of Supply, Demand, or both ?).” Globe: revue internationale d’études québécoises 11:151–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Gérard. 2012. L'interculturalisme. Un point de vue Québécois (Interculturalism. A Quebec Perspective). Montreal: Boréal.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Gérard, and Taylor, Charles. 2008 Building the Future: A Time for Reconciliation. Quebec: Gouvernement du Québec.Google Scholar
Clements, Ben. 2013. “Explaining Public Attitudes towards the Integration of Muslims in British Society: The ‘Solidarity of the Religious’?” Journal of Contemporary Religion 28:49–65.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 2006. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics (1964).” Critical Review 18:1–74.Google Scholar
Daly, Eoin. 2012. “Laïcité, Gender Equality and the Politics of Non-Domination.” European Journal of Political Theory 11:292–323.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 2006. The God Delusion. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Eagle, David E. 2011. “Changing Patterns of Attendance at Religious Services in Canada, 1986–2008.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 50:187–200.Google Scholar
Fekete, Liz. 2006. “Enlightened Fundamentalism? Immigration, Feminism and the Right.” Race and Class 48:1–22.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Joel S., and Soper, J. Christopher. 2003. “The Roots of Public Attitudes towards State Accommodation of European Religious Practices before and After September 11.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42:247–258.Google Scholar
Finkelman, Paul. 2005. “The Ten Commandments on the Courthouse Lawn and Elsewhere.” Fordham Law Review 73:1477–1520.Google Scholar
Galston, William A. 1995. “Two Concepts of Liberalism.” Ethics 105:516–534.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 1995. “Racial Attitudes and Opposition to Welfare.” The Journal of Politics 57:994–1014.Google Scholar
Gustavsson, Gina. 2014. “Contemporary European Liberalism: Exclusionary, Enlightened or Romantic?” In Routledge Handbook of European Politics, ed. Magone, José M. London: Routledge, 75–96.Google Scholar
Gustavsson, Gina, van der Noll, Jolanda, and Sundberg, Ralph. 2016. “Opposing the Veil in the Name of Liberalism: Popular Attitudes to Liberalism and Muslim Veiling in the Netherlands.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 39:1719–1737.Google Scholar
Hagendoorn, Louk, and Sniderman, Paul M.. 2001. “Experimenting with a National Sample: A Dutch Survey of Prejudice.” Patterns of Prejudice 35:19–31.Google Scholar
Harris, Sam. 2006. Letter to a Christian Nation. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
Helbling, Marc. 2014. “Opposing Muslims and the Muslim Headscarf in Western Europe.” European Sociological Review 30:242–257.Google Scholar
Hitchens, Christopher. 2007. God is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. Toronto: McCelland Stewart.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Welzel, Christian. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kalkan, Kerem O., Layman, Geoffrey C., and Uslaner, Eric M.. 2009. “Bands of Others”? Attitudes toward Muslims in Contemporary American Society.” The Journal of Politics 71:847–862.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Kam, Cindy D.. 2009. Us Against Them: Ethnocentric Foundations of American Opinion. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Koussens, David, and Amiraux, Valérie. 2014. “Du mauvais usage de la laïcité française dans le débat public Québécois (On the Incorrect Usage of French Laïcité in Public Debate in Quebec).” In Penser la laïcité québécoise: fondements et défense d'une laïcité ouverte au Québec (Considering Quebec laïcité: Origins and a plea for an open laïcité in Quebec), ed. Lévesque, Sébastien. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval, 55–75.Google Scholar
Laborde, Cécile. 2005. “Secular Philosophy and Muslim Headscarves in Schools.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 13:305–329.Google Scholar
Lamy, Guillaume. 2015. Laïcité et valeurs québécoises. Les sources d'une controverse (Laïcité and Quebec values. The Origins of a Controversy). Montreal: Québec-Amérique.Google Scholar
Maclure, Jocelyn. 2011. “Quebec's Culture Wars.” In Quebec Questions: Quebec Studies for the Twenty-First Century, eds. Rudy, Jarrett, Gervais, Stéphan, and Kirkley, Christopher. Don Mills, Ont: Oxford University Press, 137–148.Google Scholar
Mayer, Nona. 2013. “From Jean-Marie to Marine Le Pen: Electoral Change on the Far Right.” Parliamentary Affairs 66:160–178.Google Scholar
McGoldrick, Dominic. 2011. “Religion in the European Public Square and in European Public Life — Crucifixes in the Classroom?” Human Rights Law Review 11:451–502.Google Scholar
Meunier, É-Martin, and Wilkins-Laflamme, Sarah. 2011. “Sécularisation, catholicisme et transformation du régime de religiosité au Québec. Étude comparative avec le catholicisme au Canada (Secularisation, Catholicism, and Transformation of the Religious Regime in Quebec. A comparative study with Catholicism in Canada).” Recherches sociographiques 52:683–729.Google Scholar
Modood, Tariq. 1994. “Establishment, Multiculturalism and British Citizenship.” Political Quarterly 65:53–73.Google Scholar
Potvin, Maryse. 2008. Les médias écrits et les accommodements raisonnables. L'invention d'un débat (Written Media and Reasonable Accommodation. The Invention of a Debate). www.mce.gouv.qc.ca/publications/CCPARDC/rapport-8-potvin-maryse.pdf (Accessed on January 12th, 2017).Google Scholar
Ribberink, Egbert, Achterberg, Peter, and Houtman, Dick. 2013. “Deprivation of Disbelief?: Non-Religiosity and Anti-Religiosity in 14 Western European Countries.” Politics and Religion 6:101–120.Google Scholar
Riek, Blake M., Mania, Eric W., and Gaertner, Samuel L.. 2006. “Intergroup Threat and Outgroup Attitudes: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 10:336–353.Google Scholar
Rocher, François. 2014. “La mise en oeuvre des recommendations de la Commission Bouchard-Taylor (The Implementation of the Bouchard-Taylor Commission's Recommendations).” In L'interculturel au Québec. Rencontres historiques et enjeux politiques (Interculturalism in Quebec. Historical Moments and Political Issues), eds. Emongo, Lomomba, and Bob, W. White. Montreal: Presses de l'Université de Montréal, 63–90.Google Scholar
Rokeach, Milton. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rostbøll, Christian. 2009. “Autonomy, Respect, and Arrogance in the Danish Cartoon Controversy.” Political Theory 37:623–648.Google Scholar
Roy, Olivier. 2007. Secularism Confronts Islam. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Saroglou, Vassilis, Lamkaddem, Bahija, Van Pachterbeke, Matthieu, and Bruxant, Coralie. 2009. “Host Society's Dislike of the Islamic Veil: The Role of Subtle Prejudice, Values, and Religion.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 33:419–428.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Shalom H. 1994. “Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Content of Human Values?” Journal of Social Issues 50:19–46Google Scholar
Scott, Joan Wallach 2007. The Politics of the Veil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sides, John, and Citrin, Jack. 2007. “European Opinion about Immigration: The Role of Identities, Interests and Information.” British Journal of Political Science 37:477–504.Google Scholar
Sides, John, and Gross, Kim. 2013. “Stereotypes of Muslims and Support for the War on Terror.” The Journal of Politics 75:583–598.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., and Hagendoorn, Louk. 2007. When Ways of Life Collide: Multiculturalism and Its Discontents in the Netherlands. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stephan, Walter G., and Stephan, Cookie White. 2000. “An Integrated Threat Theory of Prejudice.” In Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination, ed. Oskamp, Stuart. East Sussex: Psychology Press, 23–45.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Bram, and van der Noll, Jolanda. 2016. “The ‘Islamized Stranger’: On ‘Chronic’ Versus ‘Contextual’ Salience in the Measurement of Anti-Muslim Prejudice.” Political Psychology doi:10.1111/pops.12383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumners, William G. 1906. Folkways. Boston, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1994. Multiculturalism: The Politics of Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Triadafilopoulos, Triadafilos. 2011. “Illiberal Means to Liberal Ends? Understanding Recent Immigrant Integrations Policies in Europe.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37:861–880Google Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas, Brader, Ted, and Jardina, Ashley E.. 2013. “Immigration Opposition Among U.S. Whites: General Ethnocentrism or Media Priming of Attitudes About Latinos.” Political Psychology 34:149–166.Google Scholar
Van der Noll, Jolanda. 2010. “Public Support for a Ban on Headscarves: A Cross-National Perspective.” International Journal of Conflict and Violence 4:191–204.Google Scholar
Van der Noll, Jolanda, and Saroglou, Vassilis. 2015. “Anti-Islam or Anti-Religion? Understanding Objection Against Islamic Education.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41:219–238.Google Scholar
Velasco González, Karina, Verkuyten, Maykel, Weesie, Jeroen, and Poppe, Edwin. 2008. “Prejudice towards Muslim in the Netherlands: Testing Integrated Threat Theory.” British Journal of Social Psychology 47:667–685.Google Scholar