Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T14:56:50.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rights, Reflection, and Reciprocity: Implications of the Same-Sex Marriage Debate for Tolerance and the Political Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2016

Paul A. Djupe ,
Andrew R. Lewis  and
Ted G. Jelen
Paul A. Djupe*
Affiliation:
Denison University
Andrew R. Lewis*
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati
Ted G. Jelen*
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Paul A. Djupe, Department of Political Science, Denison University, 100 W. College St., Granville, OH 43023. E-mail: [email protected]; or to: Andrew R. Lewis, Department of Political Science, University of Cincinnati, 301 Clifton Court (ML 0375), Cincinnati, OH 45221. E-mail: [email protected]; or to: Ted G. Jelen, Department of Political Science, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 S. Maryland Pkwy., Las Vegas, NV 89154. E-mail: [email protected].
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Paul A. Djupe, Department of Political Science, Denison University, 100 W. College St., Granville, OH 43023. E-mail: [email protected]; or to: Andrew R. Lewis, Department of Political Science, University of Cincinnati, 301 Clifton Court (ML 0375), Cincinnati, OH 45221. E-mail: [email protected]; or to: Ted G. Jelen, Department of Political Science, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 S. Maryland Pkwy., Las Vegas, NV 89154. E-mail: [email protected].
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Paul A. Djupe, Department of Political Science, Denison University, 100 W. College St., Granville, OH 43023. E-mail: [email protected]; or to: Andrew R. Lewis, Department of Political Science, University of Cincinnati, 301 Clifton Court (ML 0375), Cincinnati, OH 45221. E-mail: [email protected]; or to: Ted G. Jelen, Department of Political Science, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 S. Maryland Pkwy., Las Vegas, NV 89154. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Contentious battles over state-level Religious Freedom Restoration Acts suggest a fundamental refashioning of the “culture war” clashes in American politics. Conservatives — particularly religious conservatives — have come to champion a politics of rights, using “liberal weapons” (rights) to win battles or at least stave off loses. This raises important questions about the long-run effects of making rights claims. Does rights claiming lead to balkanization and reinforce group boundaries or is rights claiming an education in the democratic process that promotes tolerance? Drawing on evidence from an experimental design, we find that exposure to rights claims made by clergy regarding exemptions from participation in same-sex ceremonies acts as a prime to boost tolerance of selected least-liked groups, an effect particularly potent for evangelical Protestants.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 630 - 648
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A., and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20:351–368.Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., Margolis, Michele F., and Sances, Michael W.. 2014. “Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Survey Respondents Pay Attention on Self-Administered Surveys.” American Journal of Political Science 58:739–753.Google Scholar
Brown, Steven P. 2002. Trumping Religion: The New Christian Right, the Free Speech Clause, and the Courts. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Burdette, Amy M., Ellison, Christopher G., and Hill, Terrence D.. 2005. “Conservative Protestantism and Tolerance toward Homosexuals: An Examination of Potential Mechanisms.” Sociological Inquiry 75:177–196.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N.. 2007. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10:103–126.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N.. 2008. “Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies.” American Political Science Review 101:637–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coats, John C. IV. 2015. “Corporate Speech and the First Amendment: History, Data, and Implications.” http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2566785 (Accessed on January 19, 2016).Google Scholar
Cook, Tony. 2015. “Gov. Mike Pence Signs ‘Religious Freedom’ Bill in Private.” http://www.indystar.com/story/news/politics/2015/03/25/gov-mike-pence-sign-religious-freedom-bill-thursday/70448858/ (Accessed on January 19, 2016).Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul A. 2015. Religion and Political Tolerance in America: Advances in the State of the Art. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., and Calfano, Brian R.. 2013. “Religious Value Priming, Threat, and Political Tolerance.” Political Research Quarterly 66:767–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., Lewis, Andrew R., Jelen, Ted G., and Dahan, Charles D.. 2014. “Rights Talk: The Opinion Dynamics of Rights Framing.” Social Science Quarterly 95:652–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N. 2001. “On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?” Journal of Politics 63:1041–1066.Google Scholar
Edgell, Penny, Gertais, Joseph, and Hartmann, Douglas. 2006. “Atheists as ‘Other’: Moral Boundaries and Cultural Membership in American Society.” American Sociological Review 71:211–234.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Marie A. 2008. Religion and the Politics of Tolerance. Waco, TX: Baylor.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Kevin, Peterson, Rolfe, and Hadley, Nathan. 2012. “Principled or Opportunist? Perceptions of Arlen Specter and His Party Switch During the 2010 Midterm Election.” American Politics Research 40:880–902.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2010. “The Political Consequences of Religiosity: Does Religion Always Cause Political Intolerance?” In Religion and Democracy in the United States: Danger or Opportunity?, eds. Wolfe, Alan, and Katznelson, Ira. New York, NY: Russell Sage, 147–175.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Gouws, Amanda. 2000. “Social Identities and Political Tolerance: Linkages Within the South African Mass Public.” American Journal of Political Science 44:272–286.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1991. Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., Aronow, Peter M., Bergan, Daniel E., Greene, Pamela, Paris, Celia, and Weinberger, Beth I.. 2011. “Does Knowledge of Constitutional Principles Increase Support for Civil Liberties? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment.” Journal of Politics 73:463–476.Google Scholar
Gross, Kimberly A. and Kinder, Donald R.. 1998. “A Collision of Principles? Free Expression, Racial Equality, and the Prohibition of Racist Speech.” British Journal of Political Science 28:445–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Joslyn, Mark R.. 2001. “Gun Policy, Opinion, Tragedy, and Blame Attribution: The Conditional Influence of Issue Frames.” American Journal of Political Science 63:520–543.Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of Political Thought. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Hunter, James Davison. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Gaurav, and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76:405–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelen, Ted G. 2005. “Political Esperanto: Rhetorical Resources and Limitations of the Christian Right in the United States.” Sociology of Religion 66:303–321.Google Scholar
Jelen, Ted G., and Wilcox, Clyde. 1990. “Denominational Preference and the Dimensions of Political Tolerance.” Sociological Analysis 51:69–81.Google Scholar
Kalkan, Kerem O., Layman, Geoffrey C., and Uslaner, Eric M.. 2009. “Band of Others? Attitudes toward Muslims in Contemporary American Society.” Journal of Politics 71:847–862.Google Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A., and Kinder, Donald R.. 1990. “Altering the Foundations of Support for the President Through Priming.” American Political Science Review 84:497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupnikov, Yanna, and Levine, Adam S.. 2014. “Cross-Sample Comparisons and External Validity.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 1:59–80.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Andrew R. 2014. “Abortion Politics and the Decline of the Separation of Church and State: The Southern Baptist Case.” Politics & Religion 7:521–549.Google Scholar
Lewis, Andrew R., Djupe, Paul A., Mockabee, Stephen T., and Su-Ya Wu, Joshua. 2015. “The (Non) Religion of Mechanical Turk Workers.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 54:419–428.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., Sullivan, John L., Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, and Wood, Sandra. 1995. With Malice toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments. New York, CA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Eric C. 2014. “Fighting for Freedom: Liberal Argumentation in Culture War Rhetoric.” Journal of Communication and Religion 37:102–125.Google Scholar
Mockabee, Stephen T. 2007. “A Question of Authority: Religion and Cultural Conflict in the 2004 Election.” Political Behavior 29:221–248.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2002. “Cross-Cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice.” American Political Science Review 96:111–126.Google Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., Clawson, Rosalee A., and Oxley, Zoe M.. 1997. “Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance.” American Political Science Revie:567–583.Google Scholar
Piacenza, Joanna. 2015. “10 Things the American Values Atlas Teaches Us About America's Religious Landscape.” http://www.prri.org/spotlight/10-things-the-american-values-atlas-teaches-us-about-religion/ (Accessed on January 19, 2016).Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Reimer, Sam, and Park, Jerry Z.. 2001. “Tolerant (In)civility: A Longitudinal Analysis of White Conservative Protestants’ Willingness to Grant Civil Liberties.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 40:735–745.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1999. “Religion as a Conversation Stopper.” In Philosophy and Social Hope. New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Smith, Christian. 1998. American Evangelicalism: Embattled and Thriving. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, John L., Piereson, James, and Marcus, George E.. 1979. “An Alternative Conceptualization of Political Tolerance: Illusory Increases 1950s–1970s.” American Political Science Review 73:781–794.Google Scholar
Sullivan, John L., Piereson, James, and Marcus, George E.. 1982. Political Tolerance and American Democracy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven M. 2008. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Transue, John E. 2007. “Identity Salience, Identity Acceptance, and Racial Policy Attitudes: American National Identity as a Uniting Force.” American Journal of Political Science 51:78–91.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Stephanie. 2015. “RFRA's Roots Tied to Gay Marriage Fight.” http://www.indystar.com/story/news/politics/2015/04/02/rfra-discrimination-concerns-really-surprise/70820966/ (Accessed on January 19, 2016).Google Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde, and Kim, Christine. 2015. “Fearful Asymmetry: Tolerance of Christian Fundamentalists among Political Elites.” In Religion and Political Tolerance in America – Advances in the State of the Art, ed. Djupe, Paul A. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Djupe supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Djupe supplementary material(File)
File 85.9 KB