Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T02:38:46.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Religious Group Cues and Citizen Policy Attitudes in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2013

Todd Adkins ,
Geoffrey C. Layman ,
David E. Campbell  and
John C. Green
Todd Adkins*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
Geoffrey C. Layman*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
David E. Campbell*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
John C. Green*
Affiliation:
University of Akron
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Todd Adkins, Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556. E-mail: [email protected]
Geoffrey C. Layman, Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556. E-mail: [email protected]
David E. Campbell, Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556. E-mail: [email protected]
John C. Green, Institute of Applied Politics, University of Akron, 302 Buchtel Commons, Akron, OH 44325. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The public opinion literature shows that cues about the policy positions of social groups influence citizens’ political attitudes. We assess whether cues about religious groups’ positions affect attitudes on three issues: protection of homosexuals in the workplace, improving the socio-economic conditions of African-Americans, and government-provided health insurance. We argue that such cues should shape issue attitudes and condition the impact of religious and political orientations on those attitudes. That should be especially true on issues closely connected to religion and for citizens with low levels of political awareness. We assess this argument with a survey experiment pitting pairs of religious groups on opposite sides of issues. We find that religious group cues matter primarily for cultural attitudes, among less politically-aware individuals, and for the religiously unaffiliated, Democrats, and liberals. The dominant effect is negative, moving these groups away from the positions of religious leaders and especially evangelical leaders.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 235 - 263
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arceneaux, Kevin, and Kolodny, Robin. 2009. “Educating the Least Informed: Group Endorsements in a Grassroots Campaign.” American Journal of Political Science 53:755–770.Google Scholar
Bolce, Louis, and De Maio, Gerald. 1999a. “Religious Outlook, Culture War Politics, and Antipathy Toward Christian Fundamentalists.” Public Opinion Quarterly 63:29–61.Google Scholar
Bolce, Louis, and De Maio, Gerald. 1999b. “The Anti-Christian Fundamentalist Factor in Contemporary Politics.” Public Opinion Quarterly 63:508–542.Google Scholar
Bolce, Louis, and De Maio, Gerald. 2007. “Secularists, Antifundamentalists, and the New Religious Divide in the American Electorate.” In From Pews to Polling Places: Faith and Politics in the American Religious Mosaic. ed. Wilson, J. Matthew, pp. 251–276. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bolce, Louis, and De Maio, Gerald. 2008. “A Prejudice for the Thinking Class.” American Politics Research 36:155–185.Google Scholar
Boudreau, Cheryl. 2009. “Closing the Gap: When Do Cues Eliminate Differences Between Sophisticated and Unsophisticated Citizens?” Journal of Politics 71:964–976.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., and Sniderman, Paul M.. 1985. “Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning.” American Political Science Review 79:1061–1078.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Campbell, David E. 2006. “Religious ‘Threat’ in Contemporary Presidential Elections.” Journal of Politics 68: 104–115.Google Scholar
Campbell, David E., Green, John C., and Layman, Geoffrey C.. 2011. “The Party Faithful: Partisan Images, Candidate Religion, and the Electoral Impact of Party Identification.” American Journal of Political Science 55:42–58.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A.. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Geoffrey L. 2003. “Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85:808–822.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela J. 1984. “The Influence of Group Identifications on Political Perception and Evaluation.” Journal of Politics 46:760–785.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela J., and Feldman, Stanley. 1981. “The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications.” American Journal of Political Science 25:617–645.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David E., pp. 206–261. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., Hennessy, Cari Lynn, Charles, Kristi St., and Webber, Jonathan. 2010. “Competing Rhetoric Over Time: Frames Versus Cues.” Journal of Politics 72:136–148.Google Scholar
Goren, Paul, Federico, Christopher M., and Kittilson, Miki L.. 2009. “Source Cues, Partisan Identities, and Political Value Expression.” American Journal of Political Science 53:805–820.Google Scholar
Greeley, Andrew, and Hout, Michael. 2006. The Truth About Conservative Christians. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Green, John C. 2007. The Faith Factor: How Religion Influences the Vote. Westport, CT: Praeger Press.Google Scholar
Green, John C., Guth, James L., Smidt, Corwin E., and Kellstedt, Lyman A.. 1996. Religion and the Culture Wars. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Guth, James L., Green, John C., Smidt, Corwin E., Kellstedt, Lyman A., and Poloma, Margaret M.. 1997. The Bully Pulpit: The Politics of Protestant Clergy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Hill, Seth, Lo, James, Vavreck, Lynn, and Zaller, John. 2007. “The Opt-in Internet Panel: Survey Mode, Sampling Methodology and the Implications for Political Research.” Unpublished Manuscript. Los Angeles, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Hillygus, Sunshine, and Shields, Todd. 2007. The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hout, Michael, and Fischer, Claude S.. 2002. “Why More Americans Have No Religious Preference.” American Sociological Review 67:165–190.Google Scholar
Hunter, James Davison. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Jelen, Ted G. 1993. “The Political Consequences of Religious Group Attitudes.” Journal of Politics 55:178–190.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Kam, Cindy D.. 2009. Us Against Them. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuklinski, James H., and Quirk, Paul J.. 2000. “Reconsidering the Rational Public.” In Elements of Reason, eds. Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Popkin, Samuel L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2001. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 45:951–971.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C. 2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C. 2010. “Religion and Party Activists: A ‘Perfect Storm’ of Polarization or a Recipe for Pragmatism?” In Religion and Democracy in the United States: Danger or Opportunity?, eds., Wolfe, Alan, and Katznelson, Ira, pp. 212–254. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C., and Carsey, Thomas M.. 2002. “Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 46:786–802.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C., and Green, John C.. 2006. “Wars and Rumors of Wars: The Contexts of Cultural Conflict in American Political Behavior.” British Journal of Political Science 36:61–89.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review 88:63–76.Google Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 2007. “Voting for Catholic Candidates: The Evolution of a Stereotype.” Social Science Quarterly 88:953–969.Google Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 2009. “Religious Stereotyping and Voter Support for Evangelical Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly 62:340–354.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., Wlezien, Christopher, and Hildreth, Anne. 1991. “A Reference Group Theory of Partisan Coalitions.” Journal of Politics 53:1134–1149.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffrey J. 1993. “Source Cues and Policy Approval: The Cognitive Dynamics of Public Support for the Reagan Agenda.” American Journal of Political Science 37:186–212.Google Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., and Kinder, Donald. 1996. “Issue Frames and Group-Centrism in American Public Opinion.” Journal of Politics 58:1055–1078.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P. 2011. “Dominating Cues and the Limits of Elite Influence.” Journal of Politics 73:1165–1177.Google Scholar
Olson, Laura R., and Green, John C.. 2006. “The Religion Gap.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39:455–459.Google Scholar
Payton, Mark E., Greenstone, Matthew H., and Schenker, Nathaniel. 2003. “Overlapping Confidence Intervals or Standard Error Intervals: What Do They Mean in Terms of Statistical Significance?” Journal of Insect Science 3:34–39.Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., and Campbell, David E.. 2010. American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Robinson, Carin. 2010. “Cross-Cutting Messages and Political Tolerance: An Experiment Using Evangelical Protestants.” Political Behavior 32:495–515.Google Scholar
Schenker, Nathaniel, and Gentleman, Jane F.. 2001. “On Judging the Significance of Differences by Examining the Overlap Between Confidence Intervals.” The American Statistician 55:182–186.Google Scholar
Schoettmer, Patrick L., Campbell, David E., Layman, Geoffrey C., and Green, John C.. 2011. “Secular America: The Dimensions of Secularism and their Political Consequences.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A., and Tetlock, Philip E.. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1982. “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.” Annual Review of Psychology 33:1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 2003. “CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results.” Journal of Statistical Software 8:1–30.Google Scholar
Vavreck, Lynn, and Rivers, Douglas. 2008. “The 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties 18:355–366.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde, and Larson, Carin. 2010. Onward Christian Soldiers? The Religious Right in American Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Matthew. 2009. “Religion and American Public Opinion: Economic Issues.” In The Oxford Handbook of Religion and American Politics, eds., Smidt, Corwin E., Kellstedt, Lyman A., and Guth, James L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 1988. The Restructuring of American Religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Adkins Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Adkins Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 426.8 KB