Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:57:56.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Religion, State, and Democracy: Analyzing Two Dimensions of Church-State Arrangements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Michael D. Driessen
Michael D. Driessen*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Michael D. Driessen, Department of Political Science, 217 O'Shaughnessy Hall, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the essential characteristics of a democratic regime is the separation of Church and state. The elected governors of a democratic regime's institutions require sufficient autonomy in order to make policy that is within the bounds of the constitution and which cannot be contested or overruled by non-elected religious leaders or institutions. However, this requirement is often confused by scholars and politicians to mean that a democracy must also be secular. Therefore, the idea of an “Islamic democracy” for example, is often derided as a contradiction in terms. Using quantitative data from Grim and Finke (2006) and Fox (2006) on cross-national Church and state relationships, this article argues that once the core autonomy prerequisite has been fulfilled, further separation of Church and state is not necessarily associated with higher levels of democracy. In fact, the data indicate that there is a wide range of Church-state arrangements which gives religion the possibility of a central role in political life while maintaining a high quality of democratic rights and freedoms. Drawing on the statistical results of this analysis, the article concludes by rethinking about the possibilities and limits for “public” religion to strengthen democratization processes.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , April 2010 , pp. 55 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Appleby, R. Scott. 2000. The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence, and Reconciliation. New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Barrett, David, Kurian, George, and Johnson, Todd. 2001. World Christian Encyclopedia. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1999. “Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field.” In State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Rurn ed. Steinmetz, G.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2004. “From the King's House to the Reason of State: A Model of the Genesis of the Bureaucratic Field.” Constellations 11:16–36.Google Scholar
Cartocci, Roberto. 1994. Fra Lega e Chiesa: L'Italia in cerca di integrazione (Between Liega and Church: Italy in Search of Intergration). Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Casanova, José. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casanova, José. 2001. “Civil Society and Religion: Retrospective Reflections on Catholicism and Prospective Reflections on Islam.” Social Research 68:1041–1080.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Durham, W. Cole. 1996. “Perspectives on Religious Liberty: A Comparative Framework.” In Religious Human Rights in Global Perspective: Legal Perspectives, ed. Vyer, J., and Witte, J. Jr.The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathon. 2006. “World Separation of Religion and State into the 21st Century.” Comparative Political Studies 39:537–569.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathon. 2007. “Do Democracies Have Separation of Church and State.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40:1–25.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathon. 2008. A World Survey of Religion and the State. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freedom House. 2003. “Freedom in the World.” http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=15&year=2003 (Accessed December 1, 2007).Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1987. The Nation–State and Violence. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gill, Anthony. 2008. The Political Origins of Religious Liberty. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gorski, Philip. 1999. “Calvinism and State–Formation in Early Modern Europe.” In State/Culture. State Formation after the Cultural Rurn, ed. Steinmetz, G.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Andrew. 1999. Origins of Liberal Dominance: State, Church and Party in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Grim, Brian, and Finke, Roger. 2006. “International Religion Indexes: Government Regulation, Government Favoritism, and Social Regulation of Religion.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion 2:3–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Hansen, Thomas B., and Stepputat, Finn. eds. 2001. States of Imagination: Ethnographic Explorations of the Postcolonial State. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York, NY: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Introvigne, Massimo, and Stark, Roger. 2005. “Religious Competition and Revival in Italy: Exploring European Exceptionalism.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion 1:1–18.Google Scholar
Jemolo, A. Carlo. 1960. Church and State in Italy: 1850–1950. Oxford, UK: Basil Blakwell.Google Scholar
Juergensmeyer, Mark. 1993. The New Cold War? Religious Nationalism Confronts the Secular State. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis. 1996. The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, Peter, and Tarrow, Sidney. 1980. Italy in Transition: Conflict and Consensus. Totawah, NJ: Cass.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan, and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan. 1991. “Church and State in Spain from the Civil War to the Return of Democracy.” Daedulus 120:159–178.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan. 2004. “The Religious Use of Politics and/or the Political Use of Religion: ersatz ideology versus ersatz religion.” In Totalitarianism and Political Religions: Concepts for the Comparison of Dictatorships, ed. Maier, H.New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Loveman, Mara. 2005. “The Modern State and the Primitive Accumulation of Symbolic Power.” American Journal of Sociology 110:1651–1683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty, and Jaggers, Keith. 2008. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2008. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.Google Scholar
Marx, Anthony. 2003. Faith in Nation: Exclusionary Origins of Nationalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazie, Steve. 2004. “Rethinking Religious Establishment and Liberal Democracy: Lessons from Israel.” The Brandywine Review of Faith and international Affairs 2:3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, Geraldo, and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices.” Comparative Political Studies 35:5–34.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Inglehart, Ronald. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guilliermo. forthcoming. The State and Democracy.Google Scholar
Pasquino, Gianfranco. 1986. “The Demise of the First Fascist Regime and Italy's Transition to Democracy: 1943–1948.” In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Southern Europe, ed. O'Donnell, G., and Schmitter, Phillipe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Philpott, Daniel. 2007. “Explaining the Political Ambivalence of Religion.” American Political Science Review 101:505–525.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Jose Cheibub, Michael Alvarez, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1947. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred, and Robertson, Graeme. 2003. “An ‘Arab’ more than a ‘Muslim’ Democracy Gap,” Journal of Democracy 14:30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 2001. “The World's Religious Systems and Democracy.” In Arguing Comparative Politics, ed. Linz, J., and Stepan, A.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1990. Coercion, Capital and European States, AD 990 –1990. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. Vol. 2. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar