Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:31:22.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconceptualizing Church and State: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Separation of Religion and State on Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2011

Robert Brathwaite  and
Andrew Bramsen
Robert Brathwaite*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
Andrew Bramsen*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Robert Brathwaite or Andrew Bramsen, University of Notre Dame, 217 O'Shaughnessy Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Robert Brathwaite or Andrew Bramsen, University of Notre Dame, 217 O'Shaughnessy Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that the relationship between democracy and the separation of religion and state needs to be reexamined. We argue that previous studies have misconceptualized the impact that a lack of church-state separation can have on democracy, or have taken a narrow focus by concentrating on specific cases. We use principal component analysis and a large-n data set covering 125 countries to show that the separation of religion and state should be conceptualized multi-dimensionally and that it should be considered a component of democracy. Our findings show that as separation of religion and state increases, the level of democracy also increases.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , August 2011 , pp. 229 - 263
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Coppedge, Michael. 1994. Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidential Partyarchy and Factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, and Reinicke, Wolfgang. 1990. “Measuring Polyarchy.” Studies in Comparative International Development 25:51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, Alvarez, Angel, and Maldonado, Claudia. 2008. “Two Persistent Dimensions of Democracy: Contestation and Inclusiveness.” Journal of Politics 70: 632–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 2006. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Esposito, John L., and Voll, John O.. 1996. Islam and Democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, John L. 1998. Islam and Politics. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Fisch, M. Steven. 2002. “Islam and Authoritarianism.” World Politics 55: 4–37.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 2004. Religion and State Data Codebook. http://www.religionandstate.org – (Accessed on September 10, 2009).Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 2006. “World Separation of Religion and State Into the 21st century.” Comparative Political Studies 39:537–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 2007. “Do Democracies Have Separation of Religion and State?” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 2008. A World Survey of Religion and the State. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan, and Rynhold, Jonathan. 2008. “A Jewish and Democratic State? Comparing Government Involvement in Religion in Israel with other Democracies.” Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions 9:507–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan, and Sandler, Shmuel. 2005. “Separation of Religion and State in the 21st Century: Comparing the Middle East and Western Democracies.” Comparative Politics 37:317–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom House. 2008. “Frredom in the World.” http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=1 (Accessed on April 20, 2008).Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary. 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User's Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grim, Brian J., and Finke, Roger. 2006. “International Religion Indexes: Governmental Regulation, Government Favoritism, and Social Regulation of Religion.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion 2:3–10.Google Scholar
Grim, Brian J., and Finke, Roger. 2007. “Religious Persecution in Cross-National Context: Clashing Civilizations or Regulated Economies?” American Sociological Review 72: 633–658.Google Scholar
Grim, Brian J., and Wike, Richard. (2010). “Cross-Validating Measures of Global Religious Intolerance: Comparing Coded State Department Reports with Survey Data and Expert Opinion.” Politics and Religion 3:102–129.Google Scholar
Heston, Alan, and Summers, Robert, and Aten, Bettina. 2006. Penn World Table Version 6.2. http://pwt.econ.upenn.edu/php_site/pwt62/pwt62_form.php (Accessed on April 20, 2008).Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Welzel, Christian. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Steffan. 2006. Democracy and Elections in Africa. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotta, Harbom, and Wallensteen, Peter. 2007. “Armed Conflicts 1989–2006 .” Journal of Peace Research 44:621–632.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., and Jaggers, Keith. 2007. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2006. http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm (Accessed on February 24, 2010).Google Scholar
Mazie, Steven V. 2006. Israel's Higher Law: Religion and Liberal Democracy in the Jewish State. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Midlarsky, Manus I. 1998. “Democracy and Islam: Implications for Civilizational Conflict and the Democratic Peace.” International Studies Quarterly 42: 485–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L. 2009. Measuring Democracy: A Bridge between Scholarship and Politics. Balitmore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, Vincent Phillip. 2003. “James Madison's Principle of Religious Liberty.” American Political Science Review 97:17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Inglehart, Ronald. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pemstein, Daniel, Meserve, Stephen A., and Melton, James. 2008. “Democratic Compromise: A Latent Variable Analysis of Ten Measures of Regime Type.” Political Analysis 18:426–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, . 1984a. Apology of Socrates. In Texts on Socrates, translated with notes by West, Thomas G. and West, Grace Starry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 63–97.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1984b. Crito. In Texts on Socrates, translated with notes by West, Thomas G. and West, Grace Starry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 99–114.Google Scholar
Price, Daniel E. 1999. Islamic Political Culture, Democracy, and Human Rights. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E.,Cheibub, and Jose Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Religion and State Project. 2004. Association of Religion Data Archives. http://www.religionandstate.org/ (Accessed on September 10, 2009).Google Scholar
Starke, Rodney, and Finke, Roger. 2000. Acts of Faith: Explaining the Human Side of Religion. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Starke, Rodney. 2003. For the Glory of God. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred, and Robertson, Graeme B. 2003. “An ‘Arab’ More than ‘Muslim’ Electoral Gap.” Journal of Democracy 14:30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred, and Robertson, Graeme B. 2004. “Arab, Not Muslim, Exceptionalism.” Journal of Democracy 15:140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, I.F. 1988. The Trial of Socrates. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Trigg, Roger. 2007. Religion in Public Life: Must Faith Be Privatized? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, Keith. 1992. “Is a Christian State a Contradiction?” In Religion in Public Life, ed. Cohn-Sherbok, Dan and McLellan, David. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Bryan. 1982. Religion in Sociological Perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, James E. Jr. 2005. Church and State in Historical Perspective: A Critical Assessment and Annotated Bibliography. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar