Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:57:34.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring the Foundations of US State-Level Anti-Sharia Initiatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Joshua L. Mitchell  and
Brendan Toner
Joshua L. Mitchell*
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas
Brendan Toner*
Affiliation:
Arkansas Tech University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Joshua L. Mitchell, Department of Political Science, University of Arkansas, Main 435, Fayetteville, AR 72701. E-mail: [email protected]; or to Brendan Toner, Department of Political Science, Arkansas Tech University, Witherspoon Hall 255, 407 West Q Street, Russellville, AR 72801. E-mail: [email protected].
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Joshua L. Mitchell, Department of Political Science, University of Arkansas, Main 435, Fayetteville, AR 72701. E-mail: [email protected]; or to Brendan Toner, Department of Political Science, Arkansas Tech University, Witherspoon Hall 255, 407 West Q Street, Russellville, AR 72801. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years, measures have been taken to ban the use of international legal principles in state courts. While these international laws vary in terms of the specific restrictions they place on state legal practices, many of these laws have been aimed implicitly or explicitly at banning Sharia law practices. While dozens of states have attempted to pass anti-Sharia policies, thus far, only eight have been successful. In this article, we apply a policy diffusion framework to help explain the agenda placement and adoption of these measures. We find that both internal state determinants and external regional diffusion factors influence the interstate agenda placement and adoption of anti-Sharia practices. However, the regional effect is negative, meaning that these policies follow an atypical diffusion pattern. This study adds to the growing body of literature that examines the diffusion of controversial morality policies.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 720 - 743
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bachrach, Peter, and Baratz, Morton S.. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56:947–952.10.2307/1952796Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D. 1993. Agendas and Instabilities in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Frances Stokes, and Berry, William. 1990. “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis.” The American Political Science Review 84:395–415.10.2307/1963526Google Scholar
Berry, Frances Stokes, and Berry, William. 1994. “The Politics of Tax Increases in the States.” American Journal of Political Science 38:855–859.10.2307/2111610Google Scholar
Berry, William, and Baybeck, Brady. 2005. “Using Geographic Information Systems to Study Interstate Competition.” American Political Science Review 99:505–519.10.1017/S0003055405051841Google Scholar
Berry, William, Ringquist, Evan, Fording, Richard, and Hanson, Russell. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States 1960-1993.” American Journal of Political Science 42:327–348.10.2307/2991759Google Scholar
Black, Earl, and Black, Merle. 2002. The Rise of the Southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick, and Witmer, Richard. 2004. “Disentangling Diffusion: The Effects of Social Learning and Economic Competition on State Policy Innovation and Expansion.” Political Research Quarterly 57:39–51.10.1177/106591290405700104Google Scholar
Bouche, Vanessa, and Volden, Craig. 2011. “Privatization and the Diffusion of Innovations.” The Journal of Politics 73:428–442.10.1017/S0022381611000041Google Scholar
Boushey, Graeme. 2010. Policy Diffusion Dynamics in America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511778834Google Scholar
Boushey, Graeme. 2012. “Punctuated Equilibrium Theory and the Diffusion of Innovations.” Policy Studies Journal 40:127–146.10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00437.xGoogle Scholar
Brint, Steven, and Abrutyn, Seth. 2008. “Who is Right about the Right? Comparing Competing Explanations of the Link between White Evangelicals and Conservative Politics in the United States.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religio:328–350.Google Scholar
Buckley, J., and Westerland, C., , C. 2004. “Duration Dependence, Functional Form, and Corrected Standard Errors: Improving EHA Models of State Policy Diffusion.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 4:94–113.10.1177/153244000400400105Google Scholar
Butz, Adam M., Fix, Michael P., and Mitchell, Joshua L.. 2015. “Policy Learning and the Diffusion of Stand-Your-Ground Laws.” Politics & Policy 43:347–377.10.1111/polp.12116Google Scholar
Cobb, Roger, and Elder, Charles. 1975. Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda Building. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. 1991. Constructing an Organizational Field as a Professional Project: U.S. Art Museums, 1920–1940. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert, Wright, Gerald R., and McIver, John. 1989. “Political Parties, Public Opinion and State Policy in the United States.” The American Political Science Review 83:729–750.10.2307/1962058Google Scholar
Farmer, Liz. 2014. “Alabama Joins Wave of States Banning Foreign Law.” www.governing.com/topics/elections/gov-alabama-foreign-law-courts-amendment.html (Accessed on February 8, 2015).Google Scholar
Gaffney, Frank. 2010. Sharia: The Threat to America: An Exercise in Comparative Analysis. Washington DC: Center for Security Policy.Google Scholar
Gershman, Jacob. 2013. “Oklahoma Ban on Sharia Law Unconstitutional U.S. Judge Rules.” www.blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/08/16/oklahoma-ban-on-sharia-law-unconstitutional-us-judge-rules (Accessed on February 8, 2015.Google Scholar
Godwin, Marcia, and Schroedel, Jean Reith. 2000. “Policy Diffusion and Strategies For Promoting Policy Change: Evidence From California Local Gun Ordinances.” Policy Studies Journal 284:760–776.10.1111/j.1541-0072.2000.tb02061.xGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 2000. “Where do Policy Ideas Come From? A Study of Minnesota Legislators and Staffers.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10:573–598.10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024282Google Scholar
Grossback, Lawrence, Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Peterson, David. 2004. “Ideology and Learning in Policy Diffusion.” American Politics Research 32:521–545.10.1177/1532673X04263801Google Scholar
Hayes, Danny, and McKee, Seth. 2008. “Toward A One-Party South.” American Politics Research 36:3–32.10.1177/1532673X07307278Google Scholar
Jensen, Jason. 2004. “A Multipopulation Comparison of the Diffusion of Public Organizations and Policies across Space and Time.” Policy Studies Journal 32:109–127.10.1111/j.0190-292X.2004.00055.xGoogle Scholar
Jones, David, Bradley, Katherine, and Oberlander, Jonathan. 2014. “Pascal's Wager: Health Insurance Exchanges, Obamacare and the Republican Dilemma.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 39:97–137.10.1215/03616878-2395190Google Scholar
Karch, Andrew. 2007. “Emerging Issues and Future Directions in State Policy Diffusion Research.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 7:54–80.Google Scholar
Key, V.O. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John. 1989. Congressman's Voting Decisions. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.7354Google Scholar
Kingdon, John. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Leonard, Karen Isakson. 2003. Muslims in the United States: The State of Research. New York, NY: Sage.Google Scholar
Liu, Baodong. 2001. “Racial Contexts and White Interests: Beyond Black Threat and Racial Tolerance.” Political Behavior 23:157–180.10.1023/A:1013085831415Google Scholar
Makse, Todd, and Volden, Craig. 2011. “The Role of Policy Attributes in the Diffusion of Innovations.” The Journal of Politics 73:108–124.Google Scholar
Mashhour, Amira. 2005. “Islamic Law and Gender Equality — Could There be Common Ground.” Human Rights Quarterly 27:562–596.10.1353/hrq.2005.0022Google Scholar
Mayhew, D. R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McIntire, Mike. 2012. “Conservative Nonprofit Acts as a Stealth Business Lobbyist.” www.nytimes.com/2012/04/22/us/alec-a-tax-exempt-group-mixes-legislators-and-lobbyists.html?pagewanted=all (Accessed on February 8, 2015).Google Scholar
Mintrom, Michael. 1997. “Policy Entrepreneurs and the Diffusion of Innovation.” American Journal of Political Science 41:738–770.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Joshua L., and Stewart, La Shonda M.. 2014. “Emulation, Learning, or Competition? Examining Inter-County Anti-Smoking Laws in the State of Missouri.” Public Administration Quarterly 38:317–346.Google Scholar
Mooney, Christopher. 1995. “Citizens, Structures, and Sister States: Influences on State Legislative Professionalism.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20:47–67.10.2307/440149Google Scholar
Mooney, Christopher. 2001. “Modeling Regional Effects on State Policy Diffusion.” Political Research Quarterly 54:103–124.10.1177/106591290105400106Google Scholar
Morgan, David, and Wilson, L.A.. 1990. “Diversity in the American States: Updating the Sullivan Index.” Publius 20:71–81.Google Scholar
Nicholson-Crotty, Sean. 2009. “The Politics of Diffusion: Public Policy in the American States.” The Journal of Politics 71:192–205.Google Scholar
Nmehielle, Vincent O. 2004. “Sharia Law in the Northern States of Nigeria: To Implement or Not to Implement, the Constitutionality is the Question.” Human Rights Quarterly 26:730–759.Google Scholar
Otterman, Sharon. 2014. “Developer Scales Back Plans for Muslim Center Near Ground Zero.” www.nytimes.com/2014/04/30/nyregion/developer-scales-back-plans-for-muslim-center-near-ground-zero.html# (Accessed on February 8, 2015).Google Scholar
Otto, Jan Michiel. 2010. Sharia Incorporated: A Comparative Overview of the Legal Systems of Twelve Muslim Countries in Past and Present. Leiden: Leiden University Press.10.5117/9789087280574Google Scholar
Patel, Faiza, Toh, Amos, and Duss, Matthew. 2013. “Foreign Law Bans: Legal Uncertainties and Practical Problems.” www.brennancenter.org/publication/foreign-law-bans-legal-uncertainties-and-practical-problems (Accessed on February 8, 2015).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2010. “Religion and Public Life Project.” www.pewforum.org/2010/08/18/growing-number-of-americans-say-obama-is-a-muslim (Accessed on January 7, 2015).Google Scholar
Rogers, Everett. 1995. The Diffusion of Innovation. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul, and Jenkins-Smith, Hank. 1999. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment” In Theories of the Policy Process ed. Sabatier, Paul. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Savage, Robert. 1985. “When A Policy's Time Has Come: Cases of Rapid Policy Diffusion 1983–1984.” Publius 15:111–126.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People. A Realist's Guide to Democracy in America. New York, NY: Holt.Google Scholar
Schlachtenhaufen, Mark. 2010. “Sharia Law, Courts Likely on 2010 Ballot.” www.edmondsun.com/news/local_news/sharia-law-courts-likely-on-ballot/article_a9028340-24bd-5675-9b2a-9c62650e3cae.html (Accessed on February 8, 2015).Google Scholar
Shipan, Charles, and Volden, Craig. 2006. “Bottom-Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Anti-Smoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States.” American Journal of Political Science 50:825–843.Google Scholar
Shipan, Charles, and Volden, Craig. 2008. “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 52:840–857.Google Scholar
Smietana, Bob. 2014. “Murfreesboro Mosque Fight Laid to Rest After Supreme Court Ruling.”. www.religionnews.com/2014/06/03/murfreesboro-mosque-fight-laid-rest-supreme-court-ruling/ (Accessed on February 8, 2015).Google Scholar
Swift, Art. 2014. “Wyoming Residents Most Conservative, D.C. Most Liberal.” Gallup, January 31.Google Scholar
Tatalovich, Raymond. 1995. Nativism Reborn? The Official English Language Movement in the United States. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Aaron. 2008. Islam, the West and Tolerance. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillon 10.1057/9780230612044Google Scholar
Valente, Thomas. 1996. “Social Network Thresholds in the Diffusion of Innovations.” Social Networks 18:69–89.10.1016/0378-8733(95)00256-1Google Scholar
Volden, Craig. 2006. “States as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children's Health Insurance Program.” American Journal of Political Science 50:294–312.Google Scholar
Volokoh, Eugene. 2014. “Religious Law (Especially Islamic Law) in the American Courts.” Oklahoma Law Review 66:431–458.Google Scholar
Wald, Kenneth, and Calhoun-Brown, Allison. 2014. Religion and Politics in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack. 1969. “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States.” American Political Science Review 63:880–899.10.1017/S0003055400258644Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Mitchell and Toner supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Mitchell and Toner supplementary material(File)
File 28.6 KB