Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T18:43:18.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does Religion Still Matter? Religion and Public Attitudes toward Integration in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2010

Brent F. Nelsen*
Affiliation:
Furman University
James L. Guth*
Affiliation:
Furman University
Brian Highsmith
Affiliation:
Furman University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Brent F. Nelsen, Department of Political Science, Furman University, Greenville, SC 29613. E-mail: [email protected]; or to James L. Guth. E-mail: [email protected]
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Brent F. Nelsen, Department of Political Science, Furman University, Greenville, SC 29613. E-mail: [email protected]; or to James L. Guth. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Recent years have seen a proliferation of studies on the determinants of support for the European Union among national publics. Scholars have analyzed economic, political, informational, and identity factors as influences, but there has been less exploration of cultural factors, most notably religion. This article replicates our earlier studies exploring the impact of confessional culture and religious commitment on support for the European Union, expanding the purview from early member states to more recent accessions and candidates for membership. Using Eurobarometer 65.2 (Papacostas 2006), we demonstrate that religion still shapes attitudes toward European integration, but in varying ways and to different extents in several parts of the Union. In early member states, Catholics — especially committed ones — are more supportive of the European Union than Protestants, confirming earlier findings. In more recent accessions, however, religion's impact is weaker and assumes different configurations. Finally, we present evidence that even in the early member states religion is losing its influence over Europeanist sentiment and suggest that this development presents obstacles to further political integration.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, Christopher J., and Kaltenhaler, K.C.. 1996. “The Dynamics of Public Opinion toward European Integration, 1973–93.” European Journal of International Relations 2:175199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J., and Reichert, M. Shawn. 1996. “Economic Benefits and Support for Membership in the E.U.: A Cross-National Analysis.” Journal of Public Policy 15:231249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Peter, Davie, Grace, and Fokas, Effie. 2008. Religious America, Secular Europe? A Theme and Variations. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Brinegar, Adam, Jolly, Seth, and Kitschelt, Herbert. 2004. “Varieties of Capitalism and Political Divides over European Integration.” In European Integration and Political Conflict, eds. Marks, Gary and Steenbergen, Marco. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 6292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, Steve. 2002. God is Dead: Secularization in the West. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Byrnes, Timothy A. 2001. Transnational Catholicism in Postcommunist Europe. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Carey, Sean. 2002. “Undivided Loyalties: Is National Identity an Obstacle to European Integration?European Union Politics 3:387413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çarkoğlu, Ali. 2003. “Who Wants Full Membership? Characteristics of Turkish Public Support for EU Membership.” In Turkey and the European Union: Domestic Politics, Economic Integration and International Dynamics, eds. Çarkoğlu, Ali and Rubin, Barry. London, UK: Frank Cass, 171194.Google Scholar
Chelini-Pont, Blandine. 2009. “Papal Thought on Europe and the European Union in the Twentieth Century.” Religion, State & Society 37:131146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davie, Grace. 1999. “Europe: The Exception that Proves the Rule?” In The Desecularization of the World, ed. Berger, Peter L., Rapids, Grand, Eerdmans, MI, 6583.Google Scholar
Davie, Grace. 2000. Religion in Modern Europe: A Memory Mutates. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diez Medrano, Juan. 2003. Framing Europe: Attitudes to European Integration in Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehin, Piret. 2001. “Determinants of Public Support for EU Membership: Data from the Baltic Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 40:3156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichenberg, Richard C., and Dalton, Russell J.. 1993. “Europeans and the European Community: The Dynamics of Public Support for European Integration.” International Organization 47:507534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgün, Özlem, and Tillman, Erik R.. 2007. “Exposure to European Union Policies and Support for Membership in the Candidate Countries.” Political Research Quarterly 60:391400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EUbusiness. 2007. “EU Parliament Slams Croatia's Church-Backed Sex Education.” http://www.eubusiness.com/Social/sex-education-croatia.23/ (Accessed 28 January 2008).Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark N., van der Eijk, Cees, and Marsh, Michael. 1995. “Referendum Outcomes and Trust in Government: Public Support for Europe in the Wake of Maastricht.” In The Crisis of Representation in Europe, ed. Hayward, Jack. London, UK: Frank Cass, 101117.Google Scholar
Gabel, Matthew J. 1998a. “Public Support for European Integration: An Empirical Test of Five Theories.” Journal of Politics 60:333354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, Matthew J. 1998b. Interests and Integration: Market Liberalization, Public Opinion, and European Union. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, Matthew J., and Palmer, Harvey. 1995. “Understanding Variation in Public Support for European Integration.” European Journal of Political Research 27:319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, Matthew J., and Scheve, Kenneth. 2007. “Estimating the Effect of Elite Communications on Public Opinion Using Instrumental Variables.” American Journal of Political Science 51:10131028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, Matthew J., and Scheve, Kenneth. 2008. “Mixed Messages: Party Dissent and Mass Opinion on European Integration.” European Union Politics 8:3759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, Matthew J., and Whitten, Guy D.. 1997. “Economic Conditions, Economic Perceptions, and Public Support for European Integration.” Political Behavior 19:8196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greeley, Andrew M. 2003. Religion in Europe at the End of the Second Millennium. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Green, David M. 2007. The Europeans: Political Identity in an Emerging Polity. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewstone, Miles. 1986. Understanding Attitudes to the European Community. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2005. “Calculation, Community and Cues.” European Union Politics 6:419443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Introvigne, Massimo, and Stark, Rodney. 2005. “Religious Competition and Revival in Italy: Exploring European Exceptionalism.” www.religjournal.com (Accessed on 24 September 2010)Google Scholar
Jacobs, Jörg, and Pollack, Detlef. 2006. “Support Based on Values? Attitudes toward the EU in Eleven Postcommunist Societies.” In Public Opinion, Party Competition, and the European Union in Post-Communist Europe, eds. Rohrschneider, Robert and Whitefield, Stephen. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 85105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagodzinski, Wolfgang, and Dobbelaere, Karel. 1995. “Secularization and Church Religiosity.” In The Impact of Values, eds. van Deth, Jan W. and Scarborough, Elinor. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 76122.Google Scholar
Jasiewicz, Krzysztof. 2006. “Knocking on Europe's Door: Public Opinion on the EU Accession Referendum in Poland.” In Public Opinion, Party Competition, and the European Union in Post-Communist Europe, eds. Rohrschneider, Robert and Whitefield, Stephen. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 121144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Philip. 2002. The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Philip. 2007. God's Continent: Christianity, Islam, and Europe's Religious Crisis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Eric. 2010. Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth? London, UK: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Liebert, Ulrike. 1999. “Gender Politics in the European Union: The Return of the Public.” European Studies 1:197239.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Leon, and Scheingold, Stuart. 1970. Europe's Would-be Polity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Marks, Gary, Hooghe, Liesbet, Nelson, Moira, and Edwards, Erica. 2006. “Party Competition and European Integration in the East and West: Different Structure, Same Causality.” Comparative Political Studies 39:155175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, Lauren M. 2002. “Public Support for the European Union: Cost/Benefit Analysis or Perceived Cultural Threat?Journal of Politics 64:551566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, Lauren M. 2004. “Opposition to European Integration and Fear of Loss of National Identity.” European Journal of Political Research 43:895911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, Lauren M. 2006. Identity, Interests and Attitudes to European Integration. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milward, Alan S. 2000. The European Rescue of the Nation-State. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Nelsen, Brent F., and Guth, James L.. 2000. “Exploring the Gender Gap: Women, Men, and Public Attitudes toward European Integration.” European Union Politics 1:267291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelsen, Brent F., and Guth, James L.. 2003. “Religion and Youth Support for the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 41:89112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelsen, Brent F., and Guth, James L.. 2005. “Religion and Attitudes toward the European Union: The New Member States.” Presented at the European Union Studies Association Ninth Biennial International Conference, Hyatt Regency Austin, Austin, Texas, 31 March–2 April 2005.Google Scholar
Nelsen, Brent F., Guth, James L., and Fraser, Cleveland R.. 2001. “Does Religion Matter? Christianity and Public Support for the European Union.” European Union Politics 2:267291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Inglehart, Ronald. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papacostas, Antonis. 2006. Eurobarometer 65.2: The European Constitution, Social and Economic Quality of Life, Avian Influenza, and Energy Issues, March-May 2006 [Computer file]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Philpott, Daniel, and Shaw, T.S.. 2006. “Faith, Freedom and Federation: The Role of Religious Ideas and Institutions in European Political Convergence.” In Religion in an Expanding Europe, eds. Byrnes, Timothy A. and Katzenstein, Peter J.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 3464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratzinger, Joseph. 2005. Europe Today and Tomorrow: Addressing the Fundamental Issues. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
Ray, Leonard. 2003. “When Parties Matter: The Conditional Influence of Party Positions on Voter Opinions about European Integration.” Journal of Politics 65:978994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2004. “Social Constructivism and European Integration.” In European Integration Theory, ed. Wiener, Antje and Diez, Thomas. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 159176.Google Scholar
Shepard, R. 1975. Public Opinion and European Integration. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Steenbergen, Marco R., Edwards, Erica E., and de Vries, Catherine E.. 2007. “Who's Cueing Whom? Mass-elite Linkages and the Future of European Integration.” European Union Politics 8:1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swoboda, Jörg. 1996. The Revolution of the Candles: Christians in the Revolution of the German Democratic Republic. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.Google Scholar
Venneri, Giulio, and Ferrara, Paolo. 2009. “Alcide De Gasperi and Antonio Messineo: A Spiritual Idea of Politics and a Pragmatic Idea of Religion?Religion, State & Society 37:115129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetik, Raivo, Nimmerfelft, Gerli, and Taru, Marti. 2006. “Reactive Identity versus EU Integration.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44:10791102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigel, George. 2005. The Cube and the Cathedral: Europe, America, and Politics without God. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar