Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:04:49.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dignity and the Foundation of Human Rights: Toward an Averroist Genealogy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2019

Miguel Vatter Open the ORCID record for Miguel Vatter [Opens in a new window]
Miguel Vatter*
Affiliation:
Flinders University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Miguel Vatter, Business, Government and Law, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, South Australia, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this article is to give a new reconstruction of the conception of human dignity as a pre-associative yet legal status. Such a legal conception of human dignity carries a universal legal obligation to respect the “innate” right to independence and enables us to move beyond the impasse between moral and political views of human rights. The argument has a normative and a genealogical component. The normative component shows why a legal conception of human rights is grounded on the Kantian idea of an innate legal right to independence, as well as showing that Kant adopted a legal status concept of human dignity. The genealogical component shows that the conception of human dignity as legal status undergoes a transvaluation from its ancient aristocratic to its modern democratic meaning in Dante's political thought, which is itself rooted in the western reception of Arabic philosophy, in particular political Averroism. By contrast to the Christian elaboration of dignity, the Averroist genealogy of dignity better describes the modern pursuit of an ideal of worldly happiness essentially linked with the collective attainment of public happiness through the unrestricted public use of reason facilitated by republican constitutions crowned by human rights.

Type
Article
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 2020 , pp. 304 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alighieri, Dante. 1996. Monarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Andorno, Roberto. 2009. “Human Dignity and Human Rights as a Common Ground for a Global Bioethics.” Journal of Medecine and Philosophy 34 (3): 223–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arendt, Hannah. 1973. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1990. On Revolution. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 2006. Eichmann in Jerusalem. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bayefsky, Rachel. 2013. “Dignity, Honour, and Human Rights: Kant's Perspective.” Political Theory 41 (6): 809–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, Charles. 2009. The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Luca. 2015. “L'Averroismo di Dante. Qualche Osservazione Critica.” Le tre corone 2: 71–109.Google Scholar
Birmingham, Peg. 2006. Hannah Arendt and Human Rights. The Predicament of Common Responsibility. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bognetti, Giovanni. 2005. “The Concept of Human Dignity in European and US Constitutionalism.” In European and US Constitutionalism, eds. Nolte, Georg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canning, Joseph. 2011. Ideas of Power in the Late Middle Ages, 1296–1417. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Herbert A. 1992. Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes on Intellect. Their Cosmologies, Theories of the Active Intellect, and Theories of Human Intellect. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Debes, Remy, ed. 2017. Dignity: A History. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debes, Remy. 2018. “Dignity is delicate.” Aeon September. https://aeon.co/essays/human-dignity-is-an-ideal-with-remarkably-shallow-roots (Accessed April 2, 2019).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 2006. L'animal que donc je suis. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 1982. “Human Rights and Human Dignity: An Analytic Critique of Non-Western Conceptions of Human Rights.” American Political Science Review 76 (2): 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düwell, Marcus, Braarvig, Jens, Brownsword, Roger and Mieth, Diethmar, eds. 2014. The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenves, Peter. 2003. Late Kant. Towards Another Law on Earth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin. 2015. “Human Rights in Kantian Mode.” In Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights, eds. Liao, Matthew, Crudt, Rowan and Renzo, Massimo. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 654–670.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1999. “Aesthetic, Method, Epistemology.” In Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, Vol. 2, ed. Faubion, James. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Carlos. 2012. Philosophical Religions from Plato to Spinoza. Reason, Religion, and Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatti, Hilary. 2015. Ideas of Liberty in Early Modern Europe: From Machiavelli to Milton. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Michael. 2008. The Theological Origins of Modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasgow, Joshua. 2007. “Kant's Conception of Humanity.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2): 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundogdu, Ayten. 2015. Rightlessness in an Age of Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2010. “The Concept of Human Dignity and the Realistic Utopia of Human Rights.” Metaphilosophy 41 (4): 464–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höffe, Otfried. 2010. “Kant's Innate Right as a Rational Criterion for Human Rights.” In Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, ed. Denis, Lara. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 71–92.Google Scholar
James, Susan. 2012. “Realizing Rights as Enforceable Claims.” In Global Responsibilities: Who Must Deliver on Human Rights?, ed. Kuper, Andrew. London: Routledge, 79–93.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans. 2013. The Sacredness of the Person: A New Genealogy of Human Rights. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Peter. 1995. Rights. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jütten, Timo. 2017. “Dignity, Esteem, and Social Contribution: A Recognition-Theoretical View.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 25 (3): 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Victoria. 2014. The Future of Illusion. Political Theology and Early Modern Texts. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1957. “Reviews of Herder's Ideas for A Philosophy of the History of Mankind.” In Kant on History, ed. White Beck, Lewsi. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Company, 27–52.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996. Practical Philosophy. Edited by Mary Gregor. Cambridge Kant Works ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst H. 1997. The King's Two Bodies. A Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kateb, George. 2014. Human Dignity. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 2017. “Human Rights Without Human Supremacism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (6): 763–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafont, Cristina. 2016. “Should We Take the ‘Human’ Out of Human Rights? Human Dignity in a Corporate World.” Ethics & International Affairs 30 (2):1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libera, Alain de, ed. 1998. Averroès. L'intelligence et la pensée. Sur le De anima. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Libera, Alain de, ed. 2000. Averroès. L'Islam et la Raison. Anthologie de texts juridiques, théologiques et polémiques. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Marenbom, John. 2001. “Dante's Averroism.” In Poetry and Philosophy in the Middle Ages. A Festschrift for Peter Dronke, ed. Marenbom, John. Leiden: Brill, 349–374.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques. 2011. Christianity and Democracy and The Rights of Man and Natural Law. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
Mbembe, Achille. 2003. “Necropolitics.” Public Culture 15 (1): 11–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrudden, Christopher. 2008. “Human Rights and the Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights.” The European Journal of International Law 19 (4): 655–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrudden, Christopher, ed. 2014. Understanding Human Dignity. Vol. 192, Proceedings of the British Academy. London: British Academy.Google Scholar
Menke, Christoph. 2014. “Dignity as the Right to Have Rights: Human Dignity in Hannah Arendt.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity. Interdisciplinary Perspectives, eds. Dürwell, Marcus, Braarvig, Jens, Brownsword, Roger, and Mieth, Dietmar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 332–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. 2015. Christian Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. 2018. “Human Rights in Heaven.” In Human Rights: Moral or Political?, ed. Etinson, Adam. New York: Oxford University Press, 69–87.Google Scholar
Mulieri, Alessandro. 2019. “Against Classical Republicanism: The Averroist Foundations of Marsilius of Padua’s Political Thought.” History of Political Thought 40 (2): 219–245.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 2005. “The Problem of Global Justice.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2): 113–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neria, Chaim Meir. 2013. “Al-Farabi's Lost Commentary on the Ethics: New Textual Evidence.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 23: 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Michael. 2000. “Did Kant Respect Persons?” Res Publica (Liverpool, England) 6: 285–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2007. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oakley, Francis. 2006. Kingship. The Politics of Enchantment. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. 2005. “The Dark Side of Human Rights.” International Affairs 81 (2): 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Orlando. 2017. “Revisiting Slavery, Property, and Social Death.” In On Human Bondage: After Slavery and Social Death, eds. Bodel, John and Scheidel, Walter. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 265–296.Google Scholar
Patton, Paul. 2012. “Immanence, Transcendence, and the Creation of Rights.” In Deleuze and Law, eds. de Sutter, Laurent and McGee, Kyle. Edinburgh: Ediburgh University Press, 15–31.Google Scholar
Peterson, Erik. 1997. Der Brief an die Roemer. Edited by Barbara Nichtweiss. Vol. 6, Ausgewaehlte Schriften. Wuerzburg: Echter Verlag.Google Scholar
Pines, Shlomo. 1996. “La philosophie dans l’économie du genre humain selon Averroes: une réponse à Al-Farabi?” In Studies in the History of Arabic Philosophy. The Collected Works of Shlomo Pines, ed. Strousma, Sarah. Jerusalem: The Magnes Press, 357–377.Google Scholar
Pinzani, Alessandro. 2005. “Der systematische Stellenwert der pseudo-ulpianischen Regeln in Kants Rechtslehre.” Zeitschrift fuer philosophische Forschung 59 (1): 71–94.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 2005. “World Poverty and Human Rights.” Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 2010. “Human Rights Without Foundations.” In The Philosophy of Human Rights, eds. Tasioulas, John and Besson, Samantha. New York: Oxford University Press, 321–337.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. 2009. Force and Freedom. Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Michael. 2012. Dignity. Its History and Meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossello, Diego. 2017. “All in the (Human) Family? Species Aristocratism in the Return of Human Dignity.” Political Theory 6 (45): 1–23.Google Scholar
Rushd, Ibn. 1982. The Epistle on the Possibility of Conjunction with the Active Intellect. Trans. Kalman P. Bland. Vol. 7, Moreshet series. New York: Jewish Theological Seminary of America.Google Scholar
Sandberg, Eric C. 1984. “Causa Noumenon and Homo Phaenomenon.” Kant Studien 75 (3): 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangiovanni, Andrea. 2007. “Global Justice, Reciprocity, and the State.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (1): 3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangiovanni, Andrea. 2008. “Justice and the Priority of Politics to Morality.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (2): 137–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangiovanni, Andrea. 2012. “Can the Innate Right to Freedom alone Ground a System of Public and Private Rights?” European Journal of Philosophy 20 (3): 460–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangiovanni, Andrea. 2017. Humanity without Dignity: Moral Equality, Respect, and Human Rights. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver. 2009. “Kant's Concept of Human Dignity.” Kant Studien 100 (3): 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver. 2011. Kant on Human Dignity. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sgarbi, Marco. 2013. “Immanuel Kant, Universal Understanding, and the Meaning of Averroism in the German Enlightenment.” In Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe, eds. Akasoy, A. and Giglioni, G.. Dordrecht: Springer, 255–269.Google Scholar
Silvestrini, Flavio. 2013. “L'esistenza virtuosa tra Monarcha e Multitudo: Una (Composita) Lezione Aristotelica nel Monarchia Dantesco.” Il Pensiero Politico 46 (3): 271–297.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 2001. Justification and Legitimacy. Essays on Rights and Obligations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 2001. “A Third Concept of Liberty.” Proceedings of the British Academy 117: 237–268.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 2009. “A Genealogy of the Modern State.” Proceedings of the British Academy 162: 325–370.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 2018. From Humanism to Hobbes. Studies in Rhetoric and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Christopher S. 2010. Should Trees Have Standing? Law, Morality and the Environment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tasioulas, John. 2011. “On the Nature of Human Rights.” In The Philosophy of Human Rights: Contemporary Controversies, eds. Heilinger, Jan-Christoph and Ernst, Gerhard. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 17–59.Google Scholar
Tasioulas, John. 2013. “Human Dignity and the Foundations of Human Rights.” SSRN January. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2557649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 2004. Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, Brian. 1997. The Idea of Natural Rights. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Valentini, Laura. 2017. “Dignity and Human Rights: A Reconceptualisation.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 37 (4): 862–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waal, Frans de. 2017. Are We Smart Enough to Know How Smart Animals Are? New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2015. Dignity, Rank, and Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2017. One Another's Equals: The Basis of Human Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welz, Claudia. 2016. Humanity in God's Image. An Interdisciplinary Exploration. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieland, Georg. 1982. “Happiness: The Perfection of Man.” In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, eds. Kenny, Anthony, Pinborg, Jan and Kretzmann, Norman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 673–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirmer, David, ed. 2008. Averroes. Über den Intellekt. Auszüge aus seinen drei Kommentaren zu Aristoteles’ De anima. Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 1999. Kant's Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar